Outcome of patients with accelerated and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms not eligible for intensive chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation treated by azacitidine alone or in combination—A FIM study
Corentin Orvain, Suzanne Tavitian, Clémence Mediavilla, Françoise Boyer, Alberto Santagostino, Geoffroy Venton, Samia Madene, Tony Marchand, Pascal Turlure, Diane Lara, Lenaig Le Clech, Katell Le Du, Jean-Baptiste Robin, Lise Willems, Anaïse Blouet, Thomas Systchenko, Mathieu Wemeau, Hélène Pasquer, Mélanie Mercier, Christophe Nicol, Laurence Legros, Antoine Machet, Franck-Emmanuel Nicolini, Lydia Roy, Clémentine Salvado, Guillaume Denis, Elsa Lestang, Kamel Laribi, Damien Luque Paz, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Eric Lippert, Lina Benajiba, Jean-Christophe Ianotto
{"title":"Outcome of patients with accelerated and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms not eligible for intensive chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation treated by azacitidine alone or in combination—A FIM study","authors":"Corentin Orvain, Suzanne Tavitian, Clémence Mediavilla, Françoise Boyer, Alberto Santagostino, Geoffroy Venton, Samia Madene, Tony Marchand, Pascal Turlure, Diane Lara, Lenaig Le Clech, Katell Le Du, Jean-Baptiste Robin, Lise Willems, Anaïse Blouet, Thomas Systchenko, Mathieu Wemeau, Hélène Pasquer, Mélanie Mercier, Christophe Nicol, Laurence Legros, Antoine Machet, Franck-Emmanuel Nicolini, Lydia Roy, Clémentine Salvado, Guillaume Denis, Elsa Lestang, Kamel Laribi, Damien Luque Paz, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Eric Lippert, Lina Benajiba, Jean-Christophe Ianotto","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accelerated-phase (AP) or blast-phase (BP) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are associated with dismal prognosis, with non-curative therapies such as hypomethylating agents (HMAs) considered in patients not eligible for intensive therapy, while some studies advocate for combination therapy with either ruxolitinib (RUXO) or venetoclax (VEN). To assess the relationship between treatment modalities and outcome, herein, we report a multicentric cohort of 149 patients (median age, 75 years) with AP/BP MPN not eligible for intensive therapy and/or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation who received azacitidine (AZA) alone (<i>n</i> = 60) or in combination (<i>n</i> = 89; VEN [<i>n</i> = 51], RUXO [<i>n</i> = 27], or both [<i>n</i> = 9], isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors [<i>n</i> = 2]) between January 2019 and October 2023. With a median follow-up of 15 months, the median overall survival of the full cohort was 8.04 months, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 13%. Among disease characteristics, OS was lower in patients with BP (6.24 vs. 18.00 months in patients with AP disease, P = 0.03), complex karyotype (6.00 vs. 13.08 months, P = 0.005), and <i>TP53</i> mutations (8.04 vs. 11.04 months, P = 0.009). OS was nonsignificantly higher in patients receiving AZA combinations (10.08 vs. 6.96 months in patients receiving AZA monotherapy, P = 0.12). When analyzing AZA combinations separately, patients who were treated with AZA–RUXO had higher OS (18.00 vs. 9.00 vs. 10.08 months in patients receiving AZA–VEN and AZA–VEN–RUXO, P = 0.015). The improved survival with AZA–RUXO in the absence of complex karyotype and/or <i>TP53</i> mutations warrants further prospective validation. New therapeutic options are urgently needed, especially in patients with complex karyotype and/or <i>TP53</i> mutations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hem3.70202","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HemaSphere","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hem3.70202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accelerated-phase (AP) or blast-phase (BP) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are associated with dismal prognosis, with non-curative therapies such as hypomethylating agents (HMAs) considered in patients not eligible for intensive therapy, while some studies advocate for combination therapy with either ruxolitinib (RUXO) or venetoclax (VEN). To assess the relationship between treatment modalities and outcome, herein, we report a multicentric cohort of 149 patients (median age, 75 years) with AP/BP MPN not eligible for intensive therapy and/or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation who received azacitidine (AZA) alone (n = 60) or in combination (n = 89; VEN [n = 51], RUXO [n = 27], or both [n = 9], isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors [n = 2]) between January 2019 and October 2023. With a median follow-up of 15 months, the median overall survival of the full cohort was 8.04 months, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 13%. Among disease characteristics, OS was lower in patients with BP (6.24 vs. 18.00 months in patients with AP disease, P = 0.03), complex karyotype (6.00 vs. 13.08 months, P = 0.005), and TP53 mutations (8.04 vs. 11.04 months, P = 0.009). OS was nonsignificantly higher in patients receiving AZA combinations (10.08 vs. 6.96 months in patients receiving AZA monotherapy, P = 0.12). When analyzing AZA combinations separately, patients who were treated with AZA–RUXO had higher OS (18.00 vs. 9.00 vs. 10.08 months in patients receiving AZA–VEN and AZA–VEN–RUXO, P = 0.015). The improved survival with AZA–RUXO in the absence of complex karyotype and/or TP53 mutations warrants further prospective validation. New therapeutic options are urgently needed, especially in patients with complex karyotype and/or TP53 mutations.
期刊介绍:
HemaSphere, as a publication, is dedicated to disseminating the outcomes of profoundly pertinent basic, translational, and clinical research endeavors within the field of hematology. The journal actively seeks robust studies that unveil novel discoveries with significant ramifications for hematology.
In addition to original research, HemaSphere features review articles and guideline articles that furnish lucid synopses and discussions of emerging developments, along with recommendations for patient care.
Positioned as the foremost resource in hematology, HemaSphere augments its offerings with specialized sections like HemaTopics and HemaPolicy. These segments engender insightful dialogues covering a spectrum of hematology-related topics, including digestible summaries of pivotal articles, updates on new therapies, deliberations on European policy matters, and other noteworthy news items within the field. Steering the course of HemaSphere are Editor in Chief Jan Cools and Deputy Editor in Chief Claire Harrison, alongside the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board comprising international luminaries in both research and clinical realms, each representing diverse areas of hematologic expertise.