Effects of forest-floor litter manipulations on soil organic carbon pools in a temperate mixed forest: a stoichiometric perspective

IF 3.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yahui Dang, Xiaoyu Ren, Zhaonan Ding, Xiaoyu Zhou, Fengqin Li, Jingyu Xia, Yuxue Zhang
{"title":"Effects of forest-floor litter manipulations on soil organic carbon pools in a temperate mixed forest: a stoichiometric perspective","authors":"Yahui Dang,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Ren,&nbsp;Zhaonan Ding,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Zhou,&nbsp;Fengqin Li,&nbsp;Jingyu Xia,&nbsp;Yuxue Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10533-025-01269-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Litter traits are closely associated with soil organic carbon (SOC) persistence. However, quantified effects of litter quality and quantity on SOC formation and loss are still debated, as they depend on complex biotic and abiotic interactions. Specifically, it remains unclear how the elemental (e.g., carbon [C] and nitrogen [N]) stoichiometry impacts the SOC pool through its control over nutrient cycling and energy flow. Here, we quantified the variations in bulk SOC and its fractionations (particulate organic carbon [POC], mineral-associated organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon [MBC]) under different litter treatments varying in quality and quantity, using a 13-year detrital manipulation experiment in a temperate mixed forest. We found that double mixed litter input increased bulk SOC pool by 58.5%, with a 67.2% increase in POC at 0–10 cm depth. Litter removal reduced POC by 40.4% (0–10 cm) and 49.8% (10–20 cm). Notably, litter removal and double woody litter input reduced the carbon to nitrogen ratio (C:N) of bulk soil, particulate and mineral-associated fractions, but had no effect on the microbial biomass C:N. The MBC was positively correlated with POC and soil moisture at 0–10 cm depth. Our findings indicate that litter quantity dominates SOC dynamics by regulating POC. Double mixed litter exhibited non-additive effects on SOC formation, likely due to trade-offs between fresh C inputs and priming-induced C losses. While litter removal reduced the soil C:N, microbial biomass C:N was unchanged, suggesting the need for longer-term studies to understand these decoupled responses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8901,"journal":{"name":"Biogeochemistry","volume":"168 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10533-025-01269-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10533-025-01269-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Litter traits are closely associated with soil organic carbon (SOC) persistence. However, quantified effects of litter quality and quantity on SOC formation and loss are still debated, as they depend on complex biotic and abiotic interactions. Specifically, it remains unclear how the elemental (e.g., carbon [C] and nitrogen [N]) stoichiometry impacts the SOC pool through its control over nutrient cycling and energy flow. Here, we quantified the variations in bulk SOC and its fractionations (particulate organic carbon [POC], mineral-associated organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon [MBC]) under different litter treatments varying in quality and quantity, using a 13-year detrital manipulation experiment in a temperate mixed forest. We found that double mixed litter input increased bulk SOC pool by 58.5%, with a 67.2% increase in POC at 0–10 cm depth. Litter removal reduced POC by 40.4% (0–10 cm) and 49.8% (10–20 cm). Notably, litter removal and double woody litter input reduced the carbon to nitrogen ratio (C:N) of bulk soil, particulate and mineral-associated fractions, but had no effect on the microbial biomass C:N. The MBC was positively correlated with POC and soil moisture at 0–10 cm depth. Our findings indicate that litter quantity dominates SOC dynamics by regulating POC. Double mixed litter exhibited non-additive effects on SOC formation, likely due to trade-offs between fresh C inputs and priming-induced C losses. While litter removal reduced the soil C:N, microbial biomass C:N was unchanged, suggesting the need for longer-term studies to understand these decoupled responses.

温带混交林凋落物对土壤有机碳库的影响:化学计量学视角
凋落物性状与土壤有机碳持久性密切相关。然而,凋落物质量和数量对有机碳形成和损失的量化影响仍存在争议,因为它们依赖于复杂的生物和非生物相互作用。具体而言,目前尚不清楚元素(如碳[C]和氮[N])化学计量如何通过控制养分循环和能量流动来影响有机碳库。通过13年的温带混交林凋落物处理实验,定量分析了不同凋落物处理下土壤有机碳(颗粒有机碳、矿物伴生有机碳、溶解有机碳和微生物生物量碳)及其组分的变化。研究发现,在0 ~ 10 cm深度,双重混合凋落物输入使土壤有机碳总量增加58.5%,POC增加67.2%。去除凋落物可使POC降低40.4% (0-10 cm)和49.8% (10-20 cm)。值得注意的是,凋落物去除和双木本凋落物输入降低了土壤体积组分、颗粒组分和矿物组分的碳氮比(C:N),但对微生物生物量C:N没有影响。在0 ~ 10 cm深度,MBC与POC和土壤水分呈显著正相关。研究结果表明,凋落物数量通过调控POC主导土壤有机碳动态。双重混合凋落物对有机碳的形成表现出非加性效应,这可能是由于新鲜碳输入和启动引起的碳损失之间的权衡。虽然凋落物去除降低了土壤C:N,但微生物生物量C:N不变,这表明需要更长期的研究来了解这些解耦的响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biogeochemistry
Biogeochemistry 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3.2 months
期刊介绍: Biogeochemistry publishes original and synthetic papers dealing with biotic controls on the chemistry of the environment, or with the geochemical control of the structure and function of ecosystems. Cycles are considered, either of individual elements or of specific classes of natural or anthropogenic compounds in ecosystems. Particular emphasis is given to coupled interactions of element cycles. The journal spans from the molecular to global scales to elucidate the mechanisms driving patterns in biogeochemical cycles through space and time. Studies on both natural and artificial ecosystems are published when they contribute to a general understanding of biogeochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信