Neil J. Thomas MD, MPH , Arif Jivan MD, PhD , Paul C. Connors MD, MBA
{"title":"Gradual Oxygen Exposure During Coronary Bypass for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Neil J. Thomas MD, MPH , Arif Jivan MD, PhD , Paul C. Connors MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to analyze the effect of venous vs arterial blood cardioplegia and gradual oxygen exposure during emergency bypass surgery for acute myocardial infarction (MI) and to determine its causal impact on mortality, ventricular function, readmission, and defibrillator requirement in consecutive patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective cohort study, reviewing the records of patients with acute MI brought directly to surgery during 8 years at a single center. Tabular analyses were undertaken, followed by logistic regression analysis adjusting for shock, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), diabetic status, and status of ST-segment MI. Post-acute MI, post-surgery LVEF was analyzed in both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After screening of 113 charts, the analysis included 21 of 66 patients displaying hemodynamic instability or overt shock. Crude mortality was lower in treated vs control patients (2.4% vs 16%; risk ratio [RR], 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02-1.29; <em>P</em> = .049). If cardiogenic shock was present, mortality was (7.1% vs 42.9%; RR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.018-0.98; <em>P</em> = .015). Readmission for heart failure was 12.2% vs 40.0% (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.12-0.79; <em>P</em> = .009), and requirement for automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was 4.9% vs 20% (RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.051-1.16; <em>P</em> =.053). Left ventricle functional profiles showed improvement in LVEF in the treated compared with the untreated patients (+9.5; 95% CI, +2.7-+16.3; <em>P</em> = .007).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Early, purposeful deoxygenated blood cardioplegia administration was safe and led to improved mortality, decreased readmission for any heart failure, the requirement for an implantable defibrillator, and better ventricular recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 594-597"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993125000683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to analyze the effect of venous vs arterial blood cardioplegia and gradual oxygen exposure during emergency bypass surgery for acute myocardial infarction (MI) and to determine its causal impact on mortality, ventricular function, readmission, and defibrillator requirement in consecutive patients.
Methods
This is a retrospective cohort study, reviewing the records of patients with acute MI brought directly to surgery during 8 years at a single center. Tabular analyses were undertaken, followed by logistic regression analysis adjusting for shock, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), diabetic status, and status of ST-segment MI. Post-acute MI, post-surgery LVEF was analyzed in both groups.
Results
After screening of 113 charts, the analysis included 21 of 66 patients displaying hemodynamic instability or overt shock. Crude mortality was lower in treated vs control patients (2.4% vs 16%; risk ratio [RR], 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02-1.29; P = .049). If cardiogenic shock was present, mortality was (7.1% vs 42.9%; RR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.018-0.98; P = .015). Readmission for heart failure was 12.2% vs 40.0% (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.12-0.79; P = .009), and requirement for automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was 4.9% vs 20% (RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.051-1.16; P =.053). Left ventricle functional profiles showed improvement in LVEF in the treated compared with the untreated patients (+9.5; 95% CI, +2.7-+16.3; P = .007).
Conclusions
Early, purposeful deoxygenated blood cardioplegia administration was safe and led to improved mortality, decreased readmission for any heart failure, the requirement for an implantable defibrillator, and better ventricular recovery.
本研究旨在分析急性心肌梗死(MI)急诊搭桥手术中静脉与动脉血心脏骤停和渐进式氧暴露的影响,并确定其对连续患者死亡率、心室功能、再入院和除颤器需求的因果影响。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,回顾了8年来在单一中心直接接受手术治疗的急性心肌梗死患者的记录。进行表格分析,然后进行logistic回归分析,调整休克、术前左室射血分数(LVEF)、糖尿病状态和st段心肌梗死状态,分析两组急性心肌梗死后、术后LVEF。结果筛选113张图表后,66例患者中有21例出现血流动力学不稳定或明显休克。治疗组粗死亡率低于对照组(2.4% vs 16%;风险比[RR], 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02-1.29; P = 0.049)。如果存在心源性休克,死亡率为(7.1% vs 42.9%; RR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.018-0.98; P = 0.015)。心力衰竭再入院率为12.2% vs 40.0% (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.12-0.79; P = 0.009),自动植入式心律转复除颤器的需要量为4.9% vs 20% (RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.051-1.16; P = 0.053)。与未治疗的患者相比,治疗组左心室功能谱显示LVEF改善(+9.5;95% CI, +2.7-+16.3; P = .007)。结论早期,有目的的脱氧血停搏是安全的,可降低死亡率,减少心力衰竭的再入院率,减少对植入式除颤器的需求,并改善心室恢复。