Myocardial Viability by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Brandon Peine MD , Taha Lodhi BS , Soban Ahmad MD , Olajide Olatidoye MD , Kieran Ved BS , Yuanyuan Fu MA , Linda Kindell RN, BSN , Olasunkanmi Kehinde PhD , Dmitry Tumin PhD , William Irish PhD , C. Bogdan Marcu MD , Shahab A. Akhter MD
{"title":"Myocardial Viability by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting","authors":"Brandon Peine MD ,&nbsp;Taha Lodhi BS ,&nbsp;Soban Ahmad MD ,&nbsp;Olajide Olatidoye MD ,&nbsp;Kieran Ved BS ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Fu MA ,&nbsp;Linda Kindell RN, BSN ,&nbsp;Olasunkanmi Kehinde PhD ,&nbsp;Dmitry Tumin PhD ,&nbsp;William Irish PhD ,&nbsp;C. Bogdan Marcu MD ,&nbsp;Shahab A. Akhter MD","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The predictive value of myocardial viability assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is uncertain. Other assessment modalities have not shown a correlation between viability and post-CABG survival.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients from a single institution between 2014 and 2022 with ischemic cardiomyopathy who were undergoing isolated CABG and who had preoperative CMR viability assessment were included. Patients were grouped by left anterior descending artery territory viability: 0% fibrosis, 25% to 50% fibrosis, and 75% to 100% fibrosis. Primary outcomes were postoperative improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and 3-year survival. Analyses were adjusted for The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Morbidity or Mortality scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 106 patients met inclusion criteria, and they were divided into 3 groups by myocardial viability. There were no significant differences in preoperative or operative factors among the groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction improvement was seen in 60.3% of patients in the viable without fibrosis group, 79.0% of patients in the viable with fibrosis group, and 57.1% of patients in the nonviable group. Adjusted odds ratios of ejection fraction improvement among the groups demonstrated no significant differences. Similarly, there were no differences in patient survival by 3 years after CABG on Kaplan-Meier analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Myocardial viability assessment by CMR for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who are undergoing surgical revascularization does not predict left ventricular functional improvement or 3-year survival. Our data suggest that nonviable left anterior descending artery territory as assessed by CMR should not be a contraindication to CABG in otherwise appropriate surgical candidates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 589-593"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277299312500107X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The predictive value of myocardial viability assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is uncertain. Other assessment modalities have not shown a correlation between viability and post-CABG survival.

Methods

Patients from a single institution between 2014 and 2022 with ischemic cardiomyopathy who were undergoing isolated CABG and who had preoperative CMR viability assessment were included. Patients were grouped by left anterior descending artery territory viability: 0% fibrosis, 25% to 50% fibrosis, and 75% to 100% fibrosis. Primary outcomes were postoperative improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and 3-year survival. Analyses were adjusted for The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Morbidity or Mortality scores.

Results

A total of 106 patients met inclusion criteria, and they were divided into 3 groups by myocardial viability. There were no significant differences in preoperative or operative factors among the groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction improvement was seen in 60.3% of patients in the viable without fibrosis group, 79.0% of patients in the viable with fibrosis group, and 57.1% of patients in the nonviable group. Adjusted odds ratios of ejection fraction improvement among the groups demonstrated no significant differences. Similarly, there were no differences in patient survival by 3 years after CABG on Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Conclusions

Myocardial viability assessment by CMR for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who are undergoing surgical revascularization does not predict left ventricular functional improvement or 3-year survival. Our data suggest that nonviable left anterior descending artery territory as assessed by CMR should not be a contraindication to CABG in otherwise appropriate surgical candidates.
冠状动脉搭桥术前心脏磁共振成像的心肌活力分析
背景心肌磁共振成像(CMR)对缺血性心肌病行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者心肌活力的预测价值尚不确定。其他评估方式未显示生存能力与冠脉搭桥后存活之间的相关性。方法纳入2014年至2022年来自单一机构的缺血性心肌病患者,这些患者接受了孤立性冠脉搭桥,并进行了术前CMR生存能力评估。患者按左前降支区域活力分组:0%纤维化,25%至50%纤维化,75%至100%纤维化。主要结果是术后左心室射血分数的改善和3年生存率。根据胸外科学会预测的发病或死亡风险评分对分析进行了调整。结果106例患者符合纳入标准,按心肌活力分为3组。各组术前及手术因素无明显差异。无纤维化组60.3%的患者左室射血分数改善,有纤维化组79.0%的患者左室射血分数改善,无纤维化组57.1%的患者左室射血分数改善。两组间射血分数改善的校正优势比无显著差异。同样,Kaplan-Meier分析显示,CABG术后患者3年生存率无差异。结论CMR评估缺血性心肌病手术血运重建术患者心肌活力并不能预测左心室功能改善或3年生存率。我们的数据表明,CMR评估的不能存活的左前降支区域不应该成为CABG的禁忌症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信