Patient Online Ratings of Sports Medicine Surgeons Most Commonly Relate to Bedside Manner and Communication

Q3 Medicine
Shea E. Randall B.A. , Klea Gjonaj M.S. , Raheyma N. Siddiqui B.A. , Julia Mansour B.S. , Siddharth Mehrotra B.S. , Shreya M. Saraf M.S. , Mary K. Mulcahey M.D.
{"title":"Patient Online Ratings of Sports Medicine Surgeons Most Commonly Relate to Bedside Manner and Communication","authors":"Shea E. Randall B.A. ,&nbsp;Klea Gjonaj M.S. ,&nbsp;Raheyma N. Siddiqui B.A. ,&nbsp;Julia Mansour B.S. ,&nbsp;Siddharth Mehrotra B.S. ,&nbsp;Shreya M. Saraf M.S. ,&nbsp;Mary K. Mulcahey M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine whether online ratings of sports medicine surgeons are more heavily influenced by clinical or nonclinical factors and to determine whether gender and geographic region influence surgeon reviews.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A list of 102 sports medicine surgeons who were members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was randomly generated. Each surgeon was searched on the Healthgrades and Google Reviews websites, and every 1- and 5-star review for each surgeon since 2022 was compiled. The comments within these reviews were subsequently classified as clinical and nonclinical based on predetermined categories.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Surgeons averaged 25 five-star reviews (range, 0-119) and 1 one-star review (range, 0-7) from Healthgrades and Google Reviews. Among 5-star reviews, the most common positive comments were related to bedside manner (n = 1,336; 56%), communication (n = 1,216; 50.9%), and treatment success (n = 453; 19%). The most common negative comments among 1-star reviews were related to communication (n = 59; 46.8%), bedside manner (n = 57; 45.2%), and appointment efficiency/scheduling (n = 38; 30.2%). Overall, both 1- and 5-star reviews contained a higher proportion of nonclinical comments than clinical comments. Female sports medicine surgeons had a higher proportion of clinical comments in their 1-star reviews (28 of 58, 48.3%) compared with their male counterparts (58 of 202, 28.7%) (<em>P</em> = .01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most 5- and 1-star reviews of sports medicine surgeons complimented or critiqued nonclinical aspects of patient care. Among both 5- and 1-star reviews, the most common comments related to communication and bedside manner. Thus, sports medicine surgeons can improve patient satisfaction by focusing on overall demeanor and communication skills.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>These findings offer valuable insights into patient satisfaction and guide efforts to improve patient experiences and outcomes within orthopaedic sports medicine.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X25001282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether online ratings of sports medicine surgeons are more heavily influenced by clinical or nonclinical factors and to determine whether gender and geographic region influence surgeon reviews.

Methods

A list of 102 sports medicine surgeons who were members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was randomly generated. Each surgeon was searched on the Healthgrades and Google Reviews websites, and every 1- and 5-star review for each surgeon since 2022 was compiled. The comments within these reviews were subsequently classified as clinical and nonclinical based on predetermined categories.

Results

Surgeons averaged 25 five-star reviews (range, 0-119) and 1 one-star review (range, 0-7) from Healthgrades and Google Reviews. Among 5-star reviews, the most common positive comments were related to bedside manner (n = 1,336; 56%), communication (n = 1,216; 50.9%), and treatment success (n = 453; 19%). The most common negative comments among 1-star reviews were related to communication (n = 59; 46.8%), bedside manner (n = 57; 45.2%), and appointment efficiency/scheduling (n = 38; 30.2%). Overall, both 1- and 5-star reviews contained a higher proportion of nonclinical comments than clinical comments. Female sports medicine surgeons had a higher proportion of clinical comments in their 1-star reviews (28 of 58, 48.3%) compared with their male counterparts (58 of 202, 28.7%) (P = .01).

Conclusions

Most 5- and 1-star reviews of sports medicine surgeons complimented or critiqued nonclinical aspects of patient care. Among both 5- and 1-star reviews, the most common comments related to communication and bedside manner. Thus, sports medicine surgeons can improve patient satisfaction by focusing on overall demeanor and communication skills.

Clinical Relevance

These findings offer valuable insights into patient satisfaction and guide efforts to improve patient experiences and outcomes within orthopaedic sports medicine.
患者对运动医学外科医生的在线评分通常与床边态度和沟通有关
目的确定临床或非临床因素对运动医学外科医生的在线评分的影响更大,并确定性别和地理区域是否影响外科医生的评价。方法随机抽取102名美国骨科学会会员的运动医学外科医生。每位外科医生都在Healthgrades和谷歌Reviews网站上进行了搜索,并编译了自2022年以来每位外科医生的所有1星和5星评论。这些综述中的评论随后根据预先确定的类别分为临床和非临床。结果外科医生在健康等级和谷歌评价中平均获得25个五星评价(范围0-119)和1个一星评价(范围0-7)。在5星评价中,最常见的正面评价与床边态度(n = 1336; 56%)、沟通(n = 1216; 50.9%)和治疗成功(n = 453; 19%)有关。一星评价中最常见的差评与沟通(n = 59, 46.8%)、对病人态度(n = 57, 45.2%)和预约效率/安排(n = 38, 30.2%)有关。总体而言,1星和5星评价包含的非临床评论比临床评论的比例更高。女性运动医学外科医生在1星评价中的临床评论比例(58分之28,48.3%)高于男性同行(202分之58,28.7%)(P = 0.01)。结论:大多数运动医学外科医生的5星和1星评价赞扬或批评了患者护理的非临床方面。在5星和1星的评论中,最常见的评论与沟通和对病人的态度有关。因此,运动医学外科医生可以通过关注整体举止和沟通技巧来提高患者满意度。临床相关性这些发现对患者满意度提供了有价值的见解,并指导了骨科运动医学中改善患者体验和结果的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信