Current Techniques for Processing Osteochondral Allografts Are Variable: A Systematic Review

Q3 Medicine
Michael J. Meade M.D. , Kisan Patel B.S. , Nicholas A. Sgaglione M.D.
{"title":"Current Techniques for Processing Osteochondral Allografts Are Variable: A Systematic Review","authors":"Michael J. Meade M.D. ,&nbsp;Kisan Patel B.S. ,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Sgaglione M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate the current optimal processing and storage protocols for fresh cold-stored osteochondral allografts (OCAs) used for resurfacing osteochondral defects in the knee.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, 3 databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) were queried for peer-reviewed articles on OCA storage and processing techniques. Articles were excluded if performed on nonhuman subjects or were narrative or systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or other forms of secondary sources. In vivo data included study type, population size, follow-up time, type, site and location of injury, description of surgery, description of postoperative rehabilitation, and outcome criteria used. Ex vivo data collection included tissue source and type, storage procedure including temperature, media changes, gas environment, storage solution including type of solution and additive used, cell viability methodology, and outcomes methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 386 studies were screened between the 3 databases, with 27 studies satisfying all criteria. Eight human studies were included, with mean Modified Coleman Methodology Score of 48.38 ± 5.73. In total, 397 total patients were included with a mean of 49.6 patients per study. Five of the 8 studies had follow-up greater than 24 months. Three articles were retrospective studies, 4 were case series, 1 was a prospective cohort. Four articles were Level III evidence, 4 articles were Level IV evidence. In addition, 19 ex vivo human studies were included. A total of 78.95% of studies included grafts stored at 4°C or 1 to 10°C, 31.58% investigated 37°C, and 21.05% investigated room temperature. In total, 19 different storage media were investigated, with 68.42% including various additives.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>OCA storage at 4°C remains the most common temperature with the most evidence-based research. However, investigation of OCAs at 37°C and room temperature, particularly those stored with proprietary protocol such as the Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System, have shown promising results at improved maintenance of viable chondrocyte density. Variability in storage media remains without clear consensus.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>A variety of methodologies are used for OCAs, and the best strategies are not well understood. There is a need to compile the available evidence from in vivo and ex vivo studies of OCAs to resolve conflicts regarding various available methodologies and provide better understanding of current techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X2500077X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the current optimal processing and storage protocols for fresh cold-stored osteochondral allografts (OCAs) used for resurfacing osteochondral defects in the knee.

Methods

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, 3 databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) were queried for peer-reviewed articles on OCA storage and processing techniques. Articles were excluded if performed on nonhuman subjects or were narrative or systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or other forms of secondary sources. In vivo data included study type, population size, follow-up time, type, site and location of injury, description of surgery, description of postoperative rehabilitation, and outcome criteria used. Ex vivo data collection included tissue source and type, storage procedure including temperature, media changes, gas environment, storage solution including type of solution and additive used, cell viability methodology, and outcomes methodology.

Results

In total, 386 studies were screened between the 3 databases, with 27 studies satisfying all criteria. Eight human studies were included, with mean Modified Coleman Methodology Score of 48.38 ± 5.73. In total, 397 total patients were included with a mean of 49.6 patients per study. Five of the 8 studies had follow-up greater than 24 months. Three articles were retrospective studies, 4 were case series, 1 was a prospective cohort. Four articles were Level III evidence, 4 articles were Level IV evidence. In addition, 19 ex vivo human studies were included. A total of 78.95% of studies included grafts stored at 4°C or 1 to 10°C, 31.58% investigated 37°C, and 21.05% investigated room temperature. In total, 19 different storage media were investigated, with 68.42% including various additives.

Conclusions

OCA storage at 4°C remains the most common temperature with the most evidence-based research. However, investigation of OCAs at 37°C and room temperature, particularly those stored with proprietary protocol such as the Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System, have shown promising results at improved maintenance of viable chondrocyte density. Variability in storage media remains without clear consensus.

Clinical Relevance

A variety of methodologies are used for OCAs, and the best strategies are not well understood. There is a need to compile the available evidence from in vivo and ex vivo studies of OCAs to resolve conflicts regarding various available methodologies and provide better understanding of current techniques.
当前处理同种异体骨软骨移植的技术是可变的:系统回顾
目的探讨新鲜冷存骨软骨异体移植(OCAs)用于膝关节骨软骨缺损表面修复的最佳处理和保存方案。方法采用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,检索PubMed、Embase和Scopus 3个数据库,检索有关OCA存储和处理技术的同行评议文章。非人类受试者、叙述性或系统性综述、荟萃分析或其他形式的二手文献均被排除。体内数据包括研究类型、人群规模、随访时间、损伤类型、部位和位置、手术描述、术后康复描述和使用的结果标准。离体数据收集包括组织来源和类型,储存程序包括温度,介质变化,气体环境,储存溶液包括溶液类型和使用的添加剂,细胞活力方法学和结果方法学。结果3个数据库共筛选了386项研究,其中27项研究满足所有标准。纳入8项人类研究,平均修正Coleman方法学评分为48.38±5.73。共纳入397例患者,平均每项研究49.6例患者。8项研究中有5项随访时间超过24个月。3篇为回顾性研究,4篇为病例系列,1篇为前瞻性队列研究。4篇为III级证据,4篇为IV级证据。此外,还包括19项离体人体研究。共有78.95%的研究包括在4°C或1至10°C保存的移植物,31.58%的研究在37°C, 21.05%的研究在室温。共研究了19种不同的贮藏介质,其中含各种添加剂的占68.42%。结论4°C的soca保存是最常见的温度,也是最循证的研究。然而,在37°C和室温下对oca的研究,特别是那些采用专有协议(如密苏里骨软骨保存系统)保存的oca,在改善活软骨细胞密度维持方面显示出有希望的结果。存储介质的可变性仍然没有明确的共识。临床相关性用于oca的方法多种多样,但最佳策略尚不清楚。有必要汇编来自oca体内和体外研究的现有证据,以解决有关各种可用方法的冲突,并提供对当前技术的更好理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信