YouTube Videos on Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation Lack Accuracy and Quality

Q3 Medicine
Sebastian Schmidt M.D. , Alexander Bumberger M.D. , Luis Navas M.D. , Chilan B.G. Leite M.D., Ph.D. , Domenico Franco M.D. , Ali Darwich M.D. , Christian Lattermann M.D.
{"title":"YouTube Videos on Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation Lack Accuracy and Quality","authors":"Sebastian Schmidt M.D. ,&nbsp;Alexander Bumberger M.D. ,&nbsp;Luis Navas M.D. ,&nbsp;Chilan B.G. Leite M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Domenico Franco M.D. ,&nbsp;Ali Darwich M.D. ,&nbsp;Christian Lattermann M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the accuracy and informational quality of YouTube videos related to osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation as a potentially valuable educational resource for patients and health care professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic analysis of YouTube videos retrieved through a predefined search strategy using the key words “osteochondral allograft” was performed. Videos were categorized by content sources, such as health care professionals with and without commercial bias, individuals, or personal testimonials. The video’s duration, the publication date, and number of likes and views were recorded. To evaluate the accuracy, reliability and quality of video content, each video was assessed using the <em>Journal of the American Medical Association</em> (JAMA) benchmark criteria, Global Quality Score (GQS), DISCERN, and a newly developed Osteochondral Allograft Quality (OCA-QAL) score, designed specifically for this procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 80 YouTube videos were included. Overall, the quality of OCA-related YouTube videos was low, with mean scores of 2.16 (JAMA), 2.28 (GQS), 32.58 (DISCERN), and 5.71 (OCA-QAL). Only one video was rated as “excellent” on OCA-QAL, and none achieved full points on JAMA or GQS. Video categories included educational content with (27.5%) or without (51.3%) commercial bias for health care professionals, content for nonhealth care individuals (13.8%), and testimonials (7.5%). Strong positive correlations emerged between OCA-QAL, GQS, and DISCERN scores, whereas views and likes did not predict quality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>YouTube videos on OCA transplantation generally do not meet the quality standards like peer-reviewed validation necessary for reliable patient education. Given the low quality of available content, health care providers should be cautious in recommending YouTube as a resource for OCA transplantation information and should guide patients to more rigorously reviewed resources.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>As cartilage procedures like OCA transplantation become more common, surgeons and patients lack reliable online resources. This study underscores the need for improved digital health content to ensure accurate and trustworthy patient education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X25000823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the accuracy and informational quality of YouTube videos related to osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation as a potentially valuable educational resource for patients and health care professionals.

Methods

A systematic analysis of YouTube videos retrieved through a predefined search strategy using the key words “osteochondral allograft” was performed. Videos were categorized by content sources, such as health care professionals with and without commercial bias, individuals, or personal testimonials. The video’s duration, the publication date, and number of likes and views were recorded. To evaluate the accuracy, reliability and quality of video content, each video was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, Global Quality Score (GQS), DISCERN, and a newly developed Osteochondral Allograft Quality (OCA-QAL) score, designed specifically for this procedure.

Results

In total, 80 YouTube videos were included. Overall, the quality of OCA-related YouTube videos was low, with mean scores of 2.16 (JAMA), 2.28 (GQS), 32.58 (DISCERN), and 5.71 (OCA-QAL). Only one video was rated as “excellent” on OCA-QAL, and none achieved full points on JAMA or GQS. Video categories included educational content with (27.5%) or without (51.3%) commercial bias for health care professionals, content for nonhealth care individuals (13.8%), and testimonials (7.5%). Strong positive correlations emerged between OCA-QAL, GQS, and DISCERN scores, whereas views and likes did not predict quality.

Conclusions

YouTube videos on OCA transplantation generally do not meet the quality standards like peer-reviewed validation necessary for reliable patient education. Given the low quality of available content, health care providers should be cautious in recommending YouTube as a resource for OCA transplantation information and should guide patients to more rigorously reviewed resources.

Clinical Relevance

As cartilage procedures like OCA transplantation become more common, surgeons and patients lack reliable online resources. This study underscores the need for improved digital health content to ensure accurate and trustworthy patient education.
YouTube上关于同种异体骨软骨移植的视频缺乏准确性和质量
目的评价YouTube上有关同种异体骨软骨移植(OCA)相关视频的准确性和信息质量,为患者和医护人员提供潜在的有价值的教育资源。方法对以“同种异体骨软骨移植”为关键词,通过预定义的搜索策略检索到的YouTube视频进行系统分析。视频按内容来源分类,如有或没有商业偏见的医疗保健专业人员、个人或个人证言。视频的时长、发布日期、点赞数和浏览量都被记录了下来。为了评估视频内容的准确性、可靠性和质量,每个视频都使用美国医学协会杂志(JAMA)基准标准、全球质量评分(GQS)、DISCERN和新开发的专门为该程序设计的骨软骨异体移植质量(OCA-QAL)评分进行评估。结果共纳入80个YouTube视频。总体而言,与oca相关的YouTube视频质量较低,平均得分为2.16 (JAMA), 2.28 (GQS), 32.58 (DISCERN)和5.71 (OCA-QAL)。只有一个视频在OCA-QAL上被评为“优秀”,没有一个视频在JAMA或GQS上获得满分。视频类别包括医疗保健专业人员有(27.5%)或没有(51.3%)商业偏见的教育内容,非医疗保健个人的内容(13.8%)和推荐(7.5%)。OCA-QAL、GQS和DISCERN分数之间出现了强烈的正相关,而观点和喜欢并不能预测质量。结论youtube上关于OCA移植的视频通常不符合可靠的患者教育所需的同行评审验证的质量标准。鉴于现有内容的质量较低,卫生保健提供者在推荐YouTube作为OCA移植信息资源时应谨慎,并应指导患者使用更严格审查的资源。随着像OCA移植这样的软骨手术越来越普遍,外科医生和患者都缺乏可靠的在线资源。这项研究强调需要改进数字健康内容,以确保准确和值得信赖的患者教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信