Elisa J. Gordon , Jessica Gacki-Smith , Dahlya Manning , Catherine Wicklund , Debra Duquette , Clyde W. Yancy , Lutfiyya N. Muhammad , Siyuan Dong , John Friedewald , Alexander Gilbert , Matthew Cooper , Justin D. Smith , Aneesha Shetty , Akansha Agrawal
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of a Culturally Targeted Apolipoprotein L1 Counseling Training Program for Transplant Clinicians: A Pilot Study","authors":"Elisa J. Gordon , Jessica Gacki-Smith , Dahlya Manning , Catherine Wicklund , Debra Duquette , Clyde W. Yancy , Lutfiyya N. Muhammad , Siyuan Dong , John Friedewald , Alexander Gilbert , Matthew Cooper , Justin D. Smith , Aneesha Shetty , Akansha Agrawal","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2025.101075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale & Objective</h3><div><em>Apolipoprotein L1</em> (<em>APOL1</em>) genetic testing is increasingly used to evaluate potential living kidney donors (pLDs) of African ancestry. Transplant clinicians may benefit from improving knowledge and skills in delivering <em>APOL1</em> counseling. This multisite study developed and evaluated the effectiveness of a culturally targeted Counseling Training Program on <em>APOL1</em> and Living Donation (“Training Program”) to train transplant clinicians on <em>APOL1</em> biology, genetics, and genetic counseling.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>A prospective, nonrandomized pretest/posttest clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting & Participants</h3><div>Transplant nephrologists, surgeons, nurses, advanced practice providers, and general nephrologists at 6 kidney transplant centers.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><div>The training program included 8 prerecorded videos about <em>APOL1</em> and living kidney donation, counseling skills, cultural sensitivity, and shared decision making.</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><div>Knowledge and self-efficacy in genetic counseling, knowledge of genetic variation, use of race in clinical decision making, and beliefs about the relationship between genetics and race, as assessed via validated surveys.</div></div><div><h3>Analytic Approach</h3><div>Paired tests of pre–post scores from validated surveys.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 35 clinicians participated; 21 were female, and 34 had no formal genetics training. Training program exposure was significantly associated with an increase in knowledge of genetic variation: pre, 3.31 (1.41); post, 3.91 (1.27), <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04. Participants reported increased confidence post-training in their ability to know when the <em>APOL1</em> genetic test is indicated (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001), interpret <em>APOL1</em> test results (<em>P</em> < 0.001), and communicate about <em>APOL1</em> in a culturally sensitive manner (<em>P</em> < 0.001). There was a nonsignificant decrease in beliefs about relationships between genetics and race from pretest to posttest (biologic domain: pre, 9.63 (3.06); post, 9.06 (2.76), <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.32; clinical domain, pre, 11.03 (2.22); post, 10.57 (2.63), <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.36).</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Small sample size and nonrandomized design.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings suggest the training program can increase transplant clinicians’ competence in counseling pLDs about <em>APOL1</em> genetic testing. Training program dissemination may facilitate integration of <em>APOL1</em> testing and counseling into pLD evaluation nationally.</div></div><div><h3>Plain Language Summary</h3><div>Although genetic testing is increasingly used to evaluate potential living kidney donors (pLDs), transplant clinicians may benefit from improving their delivery of <em>Apolipoprotein L1</em> (<em>APOL1</em>) counseling. We developed and evaluated a culturally targeted Counseling Training Program on <em>APOL1</em> and Living Donation (“training program”) to train transplant clinicians on <em>APOL1</em> biology, genetics, and genetic counseling. We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized pretest/posttest clinical trial. The training program exposure was significantly associated with an increase in knowledge of genetic variation. Participants reported increased confidence post-training in knowing when the <em>APOL1</em> genetic test is indicated, interpreting <em>APOL1</em> test results, and communicating about <em>APOL1</em> in a culturally sensitive manner. Findings suggest the training program can increase transplant clinicians’ competence in counseling pLDs about <em>APOL1</em> genetic testing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"7 10","pages":"Article 101075"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059525001116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale & Objective
Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) genetic testing is increasingly used to evaluate potential living kidney donors (pLDs) of African ancestry. Transplant clinicians may benefit from improving knowledge and skills in delivering APOL1 counseling. This multisite study developed and evaluated the effectiveness of a culturally targeted Counseling Training Program on APOL1 and Living Donation (“Training Program”) to train transplant clinicians on APOL1 biology, genetics, and genetic counseling.
Study Design
A prospective, nonrandomized pretest/posttest clinical trial.
Setting & Participants
Transplant nephrologists, surgeons, nurses, advanced practice providers, and general nephrologists at 6 kidney transplant centers.
Intervention
The training program included 8 prerecorded videos about APOL1 and living kidney donation, counseling skills, cultural sensitivity, and shared decision making.
Outcomes
Knowledge and self-efficacy in genetic counseling, knowledge of genetic variation, use of race in clinical decision making, and beliefs about the relationship between genetics and race, as assessed via validated surveys.
Analytic Approach
Paired tests of pre–post scores from validated surveys.
Results
In total, 35 clinicians participated; 21 were female, and 34 had no formal genetics training. Training program exposure was significantly associated with an increase in knowledge of genetic variation: pre, 3.31 (1.41); post, 3.91 (1.27), P = 0.04. Participants reported increased confidence post-training in their ability to know when the APOL1 genetic test is indicated (P = 0.001), interpret APOL1 test results (P < 0.001), and communicate about APOL1 in a culturally sensitive manner (P < 0.001). There was a nonsignificant decrease in beliefs about relationships between genetics and race from pretest to posttest (biologic domain: pre, 9.63 (3.06); post, 9.06 (2.76), P = 0.32; clinical domain, pre, 11.03 (2.22); post, 10.57 (2.63), P = 0.36).
Limitations
Small sample size and nonrandomized design.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest the training program can increase transplant clinicians’ competence in counseling pLDs about APOL1 genetic testing. Training program dissemination may facilitate integration of APOL1 testing and counseling into pLD evaluation nationally.
Plain Language Summary
Although genetic testing is increasingly used to evaluate potential living kidney donors (pLDs), transplant clinicians may benefit from improving their delivery of Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) counseling. We developed and evaluated a culturally targeted Counseling Training Program on APOL1 and Living Donation (“training program”) to train transplant clinicians on APOL1 biology, genetics, and genetic counseling. We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized pretest/posttest clinical trial. The training program exposure was significantly associated with an increase in knowledge of genetic variation. Participants reported increased confidence post-training in knowing when the APOL1 genetic test is indicated, interpreting APOL1 test results, and communicating about APOL1 in a culturally sensitive manner. Findings suggest the training program can increase transplant clinicians’ competence in counseling pLDs about APOL1 genetic testing.