The intramedullary anatomy of the distal fibula as it pertains to current fibular nail offerings: A CT scan analysis

Brian Burgess DPM FACFAS , Ross Groeschl DPM AACFAS
{"title":"The intramedullary anatomy of the distal fibula as it pertains to current fibular nail offerings: A CT scan analysis","authors":"Brian Burgess DPM FACFAS ,&nbsp;Ross Groeschl DPM AACFAS","doi":"10.1016/j.fastrc.2025.100559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There has been recent increased interest in intramedullary fibular nails for the treatment of fibular fractures. While most publications highlight the clinical outcomes and decreased complication rates associated with fibular nails in comparison to their plate and screw counterparts, no studies to date have discussed the intramedually anatomy of the distal fibula as it pertains to fibular nailing. We retrospectively reviewed 197 tibial/fibular CT scans. Measurements of the intramedullary canal were taken at set points (180 mm, 130 mm from the fibular tip, the isthmus, and the widest portion of the fibula) in both the coronal and sagittal planes. 43 CT scans met inclusion criteria. The average width of the isthmus was 4.21 ± 1.08 mm (range, 2.19–7.33 mm) in the coronal plane and 5.27 ± 1.40 mm (range, 1.7–7.91 mm) in the sagittal plane. The average width of the fibula at 130 mm from the distal tip of the fibula was 5.18 ± 1.15 mm (range, 2.46–8.31 mm) in the coronal plane and 6.41 ± 1.45 mm (range, 2.88–9.89 mm) in the sagittal plane. 180 mm from the distal tip of the fibula, the average diameter was 5.77 ± 1.49 mm (range, 3.02–10.2 mm) and 7.18 ± 1.66 mm (range, 2.42–10.42 mm), for the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. This is the first study of its kind to provide important insight into the distal fibula’s intramedullary anatomy, specifically as it pertains to fibular nails.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>3</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73047,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"5 4","pages":"Article 100559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396725000941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been recent increased interest in intramedullary fibular nails for the treatment of fibular fractures. While most publications highlight the clinical outcomes and decreased complication rates associated with fibular nails in comparison to their plate and screw counterparts, no studies to date have discussed the intramedually anatomy of the distal fibula as it pertains to fibular nailing. We retrospectively reviewed 197 tibial/fibular CT scans. Measurements of the intramedullary canal were taken at set points (180 mm, 130 mm from the fibular tip, the isthmus, and the widest portion of the fibula) in both the coronal and sagittal planes. 43 CT scans met inclusion criteria. The average width of the isthmus was 4.21 ± 1.08 mm (range, 2.19–7.33 mm) in the coronal plane and 5.27 ± 1.40 mm (range, 1.7–7.91 mm) in the sagittal plane. The average width of the fibula at 130 mm from the distal tip of the fibula was 5.18 ± 1.15 mm (range, 2.46–8.31 mm) in the coronal plane and 6.41 ± 1.45 mm (range, 2.88–9.89 mm) in the sagittal plane. 180 mm from the distal tip of the fibula, the average diameter was 5.77 ± 1.49 mm (range, 3.02–10.2 mm) and 7.18 ± 1.66 mm (range, 2.42–10.42 mm), for the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. This is the first study of its kind to provide important insight into the distal fibula’s intramedullary anatomy, specifically as it pertains to fibular nails.

Level of Evidence

3
腓骨远端髓内解剖与当前腓骨钉置入的关系:CT扫描分析
近年来,人们对用髓内钉治疗腓骨骨折越来越感兴趣。虽然大多数出版物强调与钢板和螺钉相比,与腓骨钉相关的临床结果和并发症发生率降低,但迄今为止还没有研究讨论腓骨远端髓内解剖与腓骨钉的关系。我们回顾了197个胫骨/腓骨CT扫描。在冠状面和矢状面分别测量髓内管的定点(距腓骨尖端180 mm、130 mm、峡部和腓骨最宽处)。43例CT扫描符合纳入标准。峡部冠状面平均宽度为4.21±1.08 mm(范围2.19 ~ 7.33 mm),矢状面平均宽度为5.27±1.40 mm(范围1.7 ~ 7.91 mm)。距腓骨远端130 mm处,冠状面平均宽度为5.18±1.15 mm(范围2.46 ~ 8.31 mm),矢状面平均宽度为6.41±1.45 mm(范围2.88 ~ 9.89 mm)。距腓骨远端180 mm处,冠状面和矢状面平均直径分别为5.77±1.49 mm(范围3.02-10.2 mm)和7.18±1.66 mm(范围2.42-10.42 mm)。这是同类研究中首次提供了对腓骨远端髓内解剖的重要见解,特别是因为它与腓骨钉有关。证据水平
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)
Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.) Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Podiatry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
75 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信