Jeffrey A. Harding , Ilysa S. Iglesias , Brian K. Wells , Whitney R. Friedman , David D. Huff
{"title":"Juvenile salmon prey sampled at sea using a pelagic rope trawl and a frame trawl","authors":"Jeffrey A. Harding , Ilysa S. Iglesias , Brian K. Wells , Whitney R. Friedman , David D. Huff","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2025.107515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quantifying the availability of Pacific salmon prey can provide valuable insights into the behavior and survival of commercially important stocks, but discrepancies among sampling gears can make comparisons difficult. We compared two distinct nets, a Methot frame trawl (MIK) equipped with a fine-mesh liner and a pelagic Nordic rope trawl (NRT) equipped with a standard or fine liner, to the stomach contents of juvenile Chinook and coho salmon collected in coastal waters of the northern and central California Current System. Both fine-mesh nets sampled juvenile salmon prey, but while the MIK caught primarily small crustaceans (e.g. larval crabs, shrimp and amphipods) and flatfish larvae, the NRT performed best with other fish larvae, market squid, and krill. Except for squid, this complimentary assortment of fish and invertebrate prey dominated the juvenile Chinook and coho salmon diet in both years. Surprisingly, there was no difference between the abundance or composition of the nekton assemblage sampled with the NRT equipped with a standard or fine liner. While both nets caught similar prey as salmon had consumed, the NRT equipped with a fine liner had the added benefit of capturing juvenile salmon and their dominant prey organisms simultaneously, allowing for synchronous event-scale comparison of consumed and locally available prey.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50443,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Research","volume":"290 ","pages":"Article 107515"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783625002528","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Quantifying the availability of Pacific salmon prey can provide valuable insights into the behavior and survival of commercially important stocks, but discrepancies among sampling gears can make comparisons difficult. We compared two distinct nets, a Methot frame trawl (MIK) equipped with a fine-mesh liner and a pelagic Nordic rope trawl (NRT) equipped with a standard or fine liner, to the stomach contents of juvenile Chinook and coho salmon collected in coastal waters of the northern and central California Current System. Both fine-mesh nets sampled juvenile salmon prey, but while the MIK caught primarily small crustaceans (e.g. larval crabs, shrimp and amphipods) and flatfish larvae, the NRT performed best with other fish larvae, market squid, and krill. Except for squid, this complimentary assortment of fish and invertebrate prey dominated the juvenile Chinook and coho salmon diet in both years. Surprisingly, there was no difference between the abundance or composition of the nekton assemblage sampled with the NRT equipped with a standard or fine liner. While both nets caught similar prey as salmon had consumed, the NRT equipped with a fine liner had the added benefit of capturing juvenile salmon and their dominant prey organisms simultaneously, allowing for synchronous event-scale comparison of consumed and locally available prey.
期刊介绍:
This journal provides an international forum for the publication of papers in the areas of fisheries science, fishing technology, fisheries management and relevant socio-economics. The scope covers fisheries in salt, brackish and freshwater systems, and all aspects of associated ecology, environmental aspects of fisheries, and economics. Both theoretical and practical papers are acceptable, including laboratory and field experimental studies relevant to fisheries. Papers on the conservation of exploitable living resources are welcome. Review and Viewpoint articles are also published. As the specified areas inevitably impinge on and interrelate with each other, the approach of the journal is multidisciplinary, and authors are encouraged to emphasise the relevance of their own work to that of other disciplines. The journal is intended for fisheries scientists, biological oceanographers, gear technologists, economists, managers, administrators, policy makers and legislators.