Ecological restorations enhance ecosystem stability by improving ecological resilience in a typical basin of the Yangtze River, China

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Yixiao Li , Zhengyuan Zhao , Bojie Fu , Yunlong Zhang , Yihe Lü , Ting Li , Shiliang Liu , Gang Wu , Xi Zheng , Xing Wu
{"title":"Ecological restorations enhance ecosystem stability by improving ecological resilience in a typical basin of the Yangtze River, China","authors":"Yixiao Li ,&nbsp;Zhengyuan Zhao ,&nbsp;Bojie Fu ,&nbsp;Yunlong Zhang ,&nbsp;Yihe Lü ,&nbsp;Ting Li ,&nbsp;Shiliang Liu ,&nbsp;Gang Wu ,&nbsp;Xi Zheng ,&nbsp;Xing Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological restorations (ERs) have been widely implemented in recent decades to enhance ecosystem stability. However, the extent of their impacts on ecosystem stability and the underlying mechanism remain poorly understood. This study developed a comprehensive framework for ecosystem stability assessment by integrating the temporal stability of ecosystem service (ES) provision, ecological resistance, and ecological resilience. Additionally, ER intensity was quantified using vegetation index trends, while the pathways and magnitudes of key factors driving ecosystem stability were identified by partial least squares structural equation modeling. Using the Jialing River Basin as a case study, our results revealed that forests exhibited the highest ecosystem stability due to their enhanced capacity to maintain temporal stability of ES provision and ecological resilience. However, farmlands demonstrated the strongest ecological resistance, followed by forests and grasslands. ER projects were primarily implemented in northern and southern farmland regions characterized by low ecological resilience. Pathway analysis identified that favorable climates significantly enhanced the temporal stability of ES provision, and rugged topography improved the ecological resistance. However, fragmented landscape patches disrupted stable ES provision by reducing ecological connectivity, and socioeconomic development diminished both resistance and resilience through land-use intensification. Notably, ERs improved ecological resilience, which in turn elevated overall ecosystem stability. Our results indicated that the proposed framework provides a systematic approach for comprehensive ecosystem stability evaluation and offers critical insights for developing region-specific ER strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"6 6","pages":"Article 100357"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683925000963","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological restorations (ERs) have been widely implemented in recent decades to enhance ecosystem stability. However, the extent of their impacts on ecosystem stability and the underlying mechanism remain poorly understood. This study developed a comprehensive framework for ecosystem stability assessment by integrating the temporal stability of ecosystem service (ES) provision, ecological resistance, and ecological resilience. Additionally, ER intensity was quantified using vegetation index trends, while the pathways and magnitudes of key factors driving ecosystem stability were identified by partial least squares structural equation modeling. Using the Jialing River Basin as a case study, our results revealed that forests exhibited the highest ecosystem stability due to their enhanced capacity to maintain temporal stability of ES provision and ecological resilience. However, farmlands demonstrated the strongest ecological resistance, followed by forests and grasslands. ER projects were primarily implemented in northern and southern farmland regions characterized by low ecological resilience. Pathway analysis identified that favorable climates significantly enhanced the temporal stability of ES provision, and rugged topography improved the ecological resistance. However, fragmented landscape patches disrupted stable ES provision by reducing ecological connectivity, and socioeconomic development diminished both resistance and resilience through land-use intensification. Notably, ERs improved ecological resilience, which in turn elevated overall ecosystem stability. Our results indicated that the proposed framework provides a systematic approach for comprehensive ecosystem stability evaluation and offers critical insights for developing region-specific ER strategies.

Abstract Image

生态修复通过提高长江典型流域的生态恢复力来增强生态系统的稳定性
近几十年来,为了提高生态系统的稳定性,生态恢复(ERs)得到了广泛的应用。然而,它们对生态系统稳定性的影响程度及其潜在机制仍然知之甚少。本研究结合生态系统服务提供的时间稳定性、生态抗性和生态恢复力,建立了一个综合的生态系统稳定性评价框架。利用植被指数趋势量化生态系统内能强度,利用偏最小二乘结构方程模型确定驱动生态系统稳定性的关键因子的路径和大小。以嘉陵江流域为例,研究结果表明,森林具有较强的生态系统稳定性,维持ES供应的时间稳定性和生态恢复力。农田的生态抗性最强,其次是森林和草原。生态修复项目主要在生态恢复力较低的北部和南部农田地区实施。路径分析表明,有利的气候条件显著增强了ES供应的时间稳定性,崎岖的地形增强了生态抗性。然而,破碎的景观斑块通过降低生态连通性破坏了稳定的ES供应,社会经济发展通过土地利用集约化降低了抵抗和恢复能力。值得注意的是,生态恢复力提高了生态系统的整体稳定性。研究结果表明,该框架为生态系统稳定性综合评价提供了系统方法,并为制定区域生态系统稳定性战略提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geography and Sustainability
Geography and Sustainability Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues. Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes: Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations; Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability; Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing; Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信