Irene Bello MD, PhD , Alessandro Palleschi MD , Marcelo Cypel MD, PhD , Eduard Argudo MD, PhD , Alberto Sandiumenge MD, PhD
{"title":"Unlocking the potential of uncontrolled DCD in lung transplantation: A review of 2 decades of experience","authors":"Irene Bello MD, PhD , Alessandro Palleschi MD , Marcelo Cypel MD, PhD , Eduard Argudo MD, PhD , Alberto Sandiumenge MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) represents a promising yet underutilized approach to expanding the lung donor pool amid persistent organ shortages. Since the first successful lung transplantation from a uDCD donor in 2001, increasing clinical experience and advancements in organ preservation have demonstrated its feasibility. This review critically explores historical evolution, physiological basis, preservation techniques, ethical and legal considerations, and clinical outcomes of uDCD lung transplantation. The lung's unique ability to maintain viability through passive oxygen diffusion in the absence of perfusion supports its potential in the uDCD context. Compared to donors after brain death (DBD), uDCD donors may avoid systemic inflammatory response, potentially preserving graft quality. However, concerns persist regarding ischemia-reperfusion injury and mitochondrial dysfunction, highlighting the need for mitigation strategies such as ex vivo lung perfusion and normothermic ventilation. Ethical and legal challenges—particularly those related to the determination of death and consent—remain key obstacles. Organizational demands, including rapid coordination between prehospital, hospital teams and transplant teams, further limit broader implementation. Despite these barriers, reported outcomes are encouraging: to date, over 70 transplants from uDCD donors have been documented, with 1-year survival rates ranging from 71% to 87.5% and long-term outcomes comparable to DBD transplants. Integration of uDCD into routine clinical practice will require standardized protocols, robust public engagement, and institutional commitment. When appropriately implemented, uDCD lung transplantation offers a viable opportunity to increase donor availability and improve access to life-saving treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425001697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) represents a promising yet underutilized approach to expanding the lung donor pool amid persistent organ shortages. Since the first successful lung transplantation from a uDCD donor in 2001, increasing clinical experience and advancements in organ preservation have demonstrated its feasibility. This review critically explores historical evolution, physiological basis, preservation techniques, ethical and legal considerations, and clinical outcomes of uDCD lung transplantation. The lung's unique ability to maintain viability through passive oxygen diffusion in the absence of perfusion supports its potential in the uDCD context. Compared to donors after brain death (DBD), uDCD donors may avoid systemic inflammatory response, potentially preserving graft quality. However, concerns persist regarding ischemia-reperfusion injury and mitochondrial dysfunction, highlighting the need for mitigation strategies such as ex vivo lung perfusion and normothermic ventilation. Ethical and legal challenges—particularly those related to the determination of death and consent—remain key obstacles. Organizational demands, including rapid coordination between prehospital, hospital teams and transplant teams, further limit broader implementation. Despite these barriers, reported outcomes are encouraging: to date, over 70 transplants from uDCD donors have been documented, with 1-year survival rates ranging from 71% to 87.5% and long-term outcomes comparable to DBD transplants. Integration of uDCD into routine clinical practice will require standardized protocols, robust public engagement, and institutional commitment. When appropriately implemented, uDCD lung transplantation offers a viable opportunity to increase donor availability and improve access to life-saving treatment.