Radiological assessment of Cerrobend and tungsten carbide as aperture materials in proton therapy

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jia Wei Law , Alexandre Santos , Scott Penfold
{"title":"Radiological assessment of Cerrobend and tungsten carbide as aperture materials in proton therapy","authors":"Jia Wei Law ,&nbsp;Alexandre Santos ,&nbsp;Scott Penfold","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The use of patient-specific apertures in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy improves target conformity but increases secondary neutron production and induces aperture activation. While brass is commonly used for apertures, Cerrobend and tungsten carbide may offer cost-effective alternatives.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study evaluates the viability of Cerrobend and tungsten carbide for PBS apertures by examining secondary neutron production and activation using Tool for Particle Simulation (TOPAS). Comparisons were made with brass and also nickel and tungsten alloy, which are materials proposed for dynamic collimation systems (DCS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>TOPAS was used to simulate the irradiation of 230 MeV proton beams on fully closed apertures, with neutron fluence and dose scored in water phantom. Custom scorers recorded isotopes formed in apertures, with residual activity calculated using phase space files and Python scripts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nickel yielded the lowest secondary neutron dose among all tested materials. The ambient dose equivalent from neutrons produced by tungsten carbide and Cerrobend were 10 % lower and 28 % higher compared to brass, respectively. Over a 6-week treatment course with 5-fractions per week, Cerrobend and tungsten carbide showed similar and 1.4 times higher activation than brass, respectively. The residual activity of Cerrobend and tungsten carbide fell below brass 30 and 130 days post-treatment, respectively. Nickel’s initial activity was 25 % of brass but residual activity remained three times higher after one year.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Brass remains the optimal aperture material, but tungsten carbide and Cerrobend could be viable alternatives for PBS proton therapy. Nickel’s high residual activity could pose challenges for DCS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 105084"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725001942","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The use of patient-specific apertures in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy improves target conformity but increases secondary neutron production and induces aperture activation. While brass is commonly used for apertures, Cerrobend and tungsten carbide may offer cost-effective alternatives.

Purpose

This study evaluates the viability of Cerrobend and tungsten carbide for PBS apertures by examining secondary neutron production and activation using Tool for Particle Simulation (TOPAS). Comparisons were made with brass and also nickel and tungsten alloy, which are materials proposed for dynamic collimation systems (DCS).

Methods

TOPAS was used to simulate the irradiation of 230 MeV proton beams on fully closed apertures, with neutron fluence and dose scored in water phantom. Custom scorers recorded isotopes formed in apertures, with residual activity calculated using phase space files and Python scripts.

Results

Nickel yielded the lowest secondary neutron dose among all tested materials. The ambient dose equivalent from neutrons produced by tungsten carbide and Cerrobend were 10 % lower and 28 % higher compared to brass, respectively. Over a 6-week treatment course with 5-fractions per week, Cerrobend and tungsten carbide showed similar and 1.4 times higher activation than brass, respectively. The residual activity of Cerrobend and tungsten carbide fell below brass 30 and 130 days post-treatment, respectively. Nickel’s initial activity was 25 % of brass but residual activity remained three times higher after one year.

Conclusions

Brass remains the optimal aperture material, but tungsten carbide and Cerrobend could be viable alternatives for PBS proton therapy. Nickel’s high residual activity could pose challenges for DCS.
Cerrobend和碳化钨作为质子治疗孔径材料的放射学评价
背景:在铅笔束扫描(PBS)质子治疗中使用患者特异性孔径提高了靶一致性,但增加了二次中子的产生并诱导孔径激活。虽然黄铜通常用于孔,但Cerrobend和碳化钨可能提供具有成本效益的替代品。目的:本研究通过粒子模拟工具(TOPAS)检测二次中子的产生和活化,评估Cerrobend和碳化钨在PBS孔中的可行性。并与常用的动态准直系统(DCS)材料黄铜、镍合金和钨合金进行了比较。方法采用stopas软件模拟230 MeV质子束在全封闭孔径上的辐照,并在水影中进行中子通量和剂量记分。自定义评分器记录了孔隙中形成的同位素,并使用相空间文件和Python脚本计算剩余活度。结果镍在所有材料中产生的二次中子剂量最低。碳化钨和Cerrobend产生的中子产生的环境剂量当量分别比黄铜低10%和高28%。在为期6周的治疗过程中,Cerrobend和碳化钨的活性分别比黄铜高1.4倍和相似。处理后30天和130天,Cerrobend和碳化钨的残余活性分别低于黄铜。镍的初始活度是黄铜的25%,但一年后的剩余活度仍然是黄铜的三倍。结论黄铜仍是最佳的孔径材料,但碳化钨和Cerrobend可作为PBS质子治疗的可行选择。镍的高残留活性可能给DCS带来挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信