Honoring childhood agency in developmental research: Best practices, applications, and insights

Q2 Psychology
Amanda N. Howery , Olivia J. Lashley , Hanna R. Wright , Julia L. Williams , Olivia K. Nomura , Eline L. Lenne , Elizabeth K. Wood , Hanna C. Gustafsson , Elinor L. Sullivan
{"title":"Honoring childhood agency in developmental research: Best practices, applications, and insights","authors":"Amanda N. Howery ,&nbsp;Olivia J. Lashley ,&nbsp;Hanna R. Wright ,&nbsp;Julia L. Williams ,&nbsp;Olivia K. Nomura ,&nbsp;Eline L. Lenne ,&nbsp;Elizabeth K. Wood ,&nbsp;Hanna C. Gustafsson ,&nbsp;Elinor L. Sullivan","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2025.100197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pediatric research requires caregivers to provide informed consent on behalf of their children. While not a formal requirement for children under the age of seven, it is important to involve child participants in the assent and decision-making processes in developmentally appropriate ways. This is especially important in longitudinal research, where the extent to which a developing child understands study tasks evolves over time. Although there is consensus that assent procedures are important and necessary, limited resources synthesizing strategies for pediatric researchers to encourage positive and respectful research experiences for young children exist. We describe methods used in an ongoing longitudinal study following caregiver-infant dyads from gestation through five years of child age. Study visits include repeated assessment of children's behavioral, cognitive, and physical development. Additionally, we describe observations from a study that used art-based approaches to enhance agency during study visits with five-to ten-year-olds. We describe methods for promoting agency in research contexts including potential modifications based on developmental milestone achievement. We detail strategies for assessing and responding to child behaviors that may indicate dissent. By synthesizing this information, we provide a comprehensive resource that may be used to encourage positive and respectful research experiences for children. Such experiences are likely to improve data quality and retention and uphold developmental research ethics. Further, this work contributes to a larger conversation about child agency, which has been occurring for decades across academic disciplines. Promoting children's agency in research also has potential to promote healthy long-term outcomes for developing children.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260125000232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pediatric research requires caregivers to provide informed consent on behalf of their children. While not a formal requirement for children under the age of seven, it is important to involve child participants in the assent and decision-making processes in developmentally appropriate ways. This is especially important in longitudinal research, where the extent to which a developing child understands study tasks evolves over time. Although there is consensus that assent procedures are important and necessary, limited resources synthesizing strategies for pediatric researchers to encourage positive and respectful research experiences for young children exist. We describe methods used in an ongoing longitudinal study following caregiver-infant dyads from gestation through five years of child age. Study visits include repeated assessment of children's behavioral, cognitive, and physical development. Additionally, we describe observations from a study that used art-based approaches to enhance agency during study visits with five-to ten-year-olds. We describe methods for promoting agency in research contexts including potential modifications based on developmental milestone achievement. We detail strategies for assessing and responding to child behaviors that may indicate dissent. By synthesizing this information, we provide a comprehensive resource that may be used to encourage positive and respectful research experiences for children. Such experiences are likely to improve data quality and retention and uphold developmental research ethics. Further, this work contributes to a larger conversation about child agency, which has been occurring for decades across academic disciplines. Promoting children's agency in research also has potential to promote healthy long-term outcomes for developing children.

Abstract Image

在发展研究中尊重儿童代理:最佳实践,应用和见解
儿科研究要求护理人员代表他们的孩子提供知情同意。虽然不是对七岁以下儿童的正式要求,但重要的是让儿童以适合其发展的方式参与同意和决策过程。这在纵向研究中尤其重要,因为发育中的儿童对学习任务的理解程度会随着时间的推移而变化。尽管共识是同意程序是重要和必要的,但儿科研究人员鼓励幼儿积极和尊重研究经验的资源有限。我们描述了一项正在进行的纵向研究中使用的方法,该研究跟踪从妊娠到五岁儿童年龄的照顾者-婴儿对。研究访问包括对儿童行为、认知和身体发育的反复评估。此外,我们描述了一项研究的观察结果,该研究使用基于艺术的方法来增强对5至10岁儿童的研究访问。我们描述了在研究背景下促进代理的方法,包括基于发展里程碑成就的潜在修改。我们详细的策略评估和应对儿童的行为,可能表明异议。通过综合这些信息,我们提供了一个全面的资源,可以用来鼓励儿童积极和尊重的研究经验。这样的经验可能会提高数据质量和保留,并维护发展性研究伦理。此外,这项工作有助于对儿童代理进行更广泛的讨论,这种讨论已经在各个学科中进行了数十年。促进儿童在研究中的作用也有可能促进发育中儿童的长期健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methods in Psychology (Online)
Methods in Psychology (Online) Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信