Reply to Gattuso et al.: “Comments on ‘Striking long-term beneficial effects of single-dose psilocybin and psychedelic mushroom extract in the SAPAP3 rodent model of OCD-like excessive self-grooming’ by Brownstien et al. (2024)”

IF 10.1 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Michal Brownstien, Michal Lazar, Alexander Botvinnik, Ilana Pogodin, Tzuri Lifschytz, Bernard Lerer
{"title":"Reply to Gattuso et al.: “Comments on ‘Striking long-term beneficial effects of single-dose psilocybin and psychedelic mushroom extract in the SAPAP3 rodent model of OCD-like excessive self-grooming’ by Brownstien et al. (2024)”","authors":"Michal Brownstien, Michal Lazar, Alexander Botvinnik, Ilana Pogodin, Tzuri Lifschytz, Bernard Lerer","doi":"10.1038/s41380-025-03173-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We thank Gattuso and colleagues [1] for their kind comments about our paper [2]. However, we wish to note several inaccuracies in statements made about our research and respond to some of their observations:</p><ol>\n<li>\n<span>1)</span>\n<p>The contention that we did not take sex into account in our analyses is incorrect. On the contrary, we compared self-grooming and head-body twitches in male and female SAPAP3-KO mice as the first step in our data analysis. We then analyzed the effect of psilocybin treatment on these variables in males and females separately. The results are shown in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. There were no differences between males and females at baseline, nor in the effect of psilocybin treatment. Therefore, males and females were combined for further analyses. Sex was also taken into account in our analysis of the behavioral tests.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<span>2)</span>\n<p>Our study was designed and executed as would a clinical trial in patients. In patients with OCD and other disorders, clinical trials do not include an arm in which individuals who do not suffer from the disorder receive the treatment. Therefore, the non-inclusion of such an arm in our study cannot be seen as a shortcoming. Furthermore, compulsive behaviors are, frequently, normal behaviors carried out in an exaggerated way. This is true of the excessive self-grooming of SAPAP3-KO mice. It is of interest that in their own paper on the effect of psilocybin on self-grooming, Gattusso et al. [3] found evidence for a reduction of self-grooming in wild type mice administered psilocybin. However, the absence of a wild type group treated with psilocybin does not detract from the validity of our findings. In the same way, finding that fluoxetine reduces the frequency of hand-washing in individuals without OCD does not in any way detract from a finding that fluoxetine reduces compulsive handwashing.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<span>3)</span>\n<p>Gattuso et al. [1] note that excessive self-grooming increased substantially over the 42 days of our study in SAPAP3-KO mice. A progressive increase in self-grooming after the age of 6 months is by no means idiosyncratic as Gattuso et al. [3] appear to imply and has been noted by other authors. Thus, Glorie et al. [4] examined SAPAP3-KO mice from 6–9 months and reported an “increase in grooming duration with ageing.” Similarly, Manning et al. [5] reported a progressive increase in self-grooming up to the age of 8 months.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<span>4)</span>\n<p>Comments made by Gattuso et al. [1] regarding our study, rest significantly on the findings of their own study on the effect of psilocybin on self-grooming in SAPAP3-KO mice [3]. We are gratified that this work replicated our findings reported in Brownstien et al. [2]. However, we note that in their study Gattuso et al. [3] performed a very limited assessment of self-grooming, quantifying the behavior for only 10 min following 10-min acclimatization. In our study [2] we scored self-grooming over a full hour in each mouse. To determine the validity of a 10-min assessment of self-grooming, we evaluated the correlation between self-grooming scores in the second 10 min of a 1-h assessment and self-grooming scores over the full hour in 60 mice. The results show a positive correlation (r = 0.53, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001); however, this falls short of an r of 0.80 which would provide confidence as to the validity of the shorter assessment.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<span>5)</span>\n<p>We fully agree with Gattuso et al. [1] that mechanistic assessments as to the receptors involved in mediating the remarkable effects of psilocybin on excessive self-grooming in SAPAP3-KO mice are highly indicated. Such assessments were not included in their own paper either [3]. In our case, these studies are currently in progress in our laboratory.</p>\n</li>\n</ol><p>The contention that we did not take sex into account in our analyses is incorrect. On the contrary, we compared self-grooming and head-body twitches in male and female SAPAP3-KO mice as the first step in our data analysis. We then analyzed the effect of psilocybin treatment on these variables in males and females separately. The results are shown in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. There were no differences between males and females at baseline, nor in the effect of psilocybin treatment. Therefore, males and females were combined for further analyses. Sex was also taken into account in our analysis of the behavioral tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":19008,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Psychiatry","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-025-03173-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We thank Gattuso and colleagues [1] for their kind comments about our paper [2]. However, we wish to note several inaccuracies in statements made about our research and respond to some of their observations:

  1. 1)

    The contention that we did not take sex into account in our analyses is incorrect. On the contrary, we compared self-grooming and head-body twitches in male and female SAPAP3-KO mice as the first step in our data analysis. We then analyzed the effect of psilocybin treatment on these variables in males and females separately. The results are shown in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. There were no differences between males and females at baseline, nor in the effect of psilocybin treatment. Therefore, males and females were combined for further analyses. Sex was also taken into account in our analysis of the behavioral tests.

  2. 2)

    Our study was designed and executed as would a clinical trial in patients. In patients with OCD and other disorders, clinical trials do not include an arm in which individuals who do not suffer from the disorder receive the treatment. Therefore, the non-inclusion of such an arm in our study cannot be seen as a shortcoming. Furthermore, compulsive behaviors are, frequently, normal behaviors carried out in an exaggerated way. This is true of the excessive self-grooming of SAPAP3-KO mice. It is of interest that in their own paper on the effect of psilocybin on self-grooming, Gattusso et al. [3] found evidence for a reduction of self-grooming in wild type mice administered psilocybin. However, the absence of a wild type group treated with psilocybin does not detract from the validity of our findings. In the same way, finding that fluoxetine reduces the frequency of hand-washing in individuals without OCD does not in any way detract from a finding that fluoxetine reduces compulsive handwashing.

  3. 3)

    Gattuso et al. [1] note that excessive self-grooming increased substantially over the 42 days of our study in SAPAP3-KO mice. A progressive increase in self-grooming after the age of 6 months is by no means idiosyncratic as Gattuso et al. [3] appear to imply and has been noted by other authors. Thus, Glorie et al. [4] examined SAPAP3-KO mice from 6–9 months and reported an “increase in grooming duration with ageing.” Similarly, Manning et al. [5] reported a progressive increase in self-grooming up to the age of 8 months.

  4. 4)

    Comments made by Gattuso et al. [1] regarding our study, rest significantly on the findings of their own study on the effect of psilocybin on self-grooming in SAPAP3-KO mice [3]. We are gratified that this work replicated our findings reported in Brownstien et al. [2]. However, we note that in their study Gattuso et al. [3] performed a very limited assessment of self-grooming, quantifying the behavior for only 10 min following 10-min acclimatization. In our study [2] we scored self-grooming over a full hour in each mouse. To determine the validity of a 10-min assessment of self-grooming, we evaluated the correlation between self-grooming scores in the second 10 min of a 1-h assessment and self-grooming scores over the full hour in 60 mice. The results show a positive correlation (r = 0.53, p < 0.0001); however, this falls short of an r of 0.80 which would provide confidence as to the validity of the shorter assessment.

  5. 5)

    We fully agree with Gattuso et al. [1] that mechanistic assessments as to the receptors involved in mediating the remarkable effects of psilocybin on excessive self-grooming in SAPAP3-KO mice are highly indicated. Such assessments were not included in their own paper either [3]. In our case, these studies are currently in progress in our laboratory.

The contention that we did not take sex into account in our analyses is incorrect. On the contrary, we compared self-grooming and head-body twitches in male and female SAPAP3-KO mice as the first step in our data analysis. We then analyzed the effect of psilocybin treatment on these variables in males and females separately. The results are shown in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. There were no differences between males and females at baseline, nor in the effect of psilocybin treatment. Therefore, males and females were combined for further analyses. Sex was also taken into account in our analysis of the behavioral tests.

回复Gattuso等人:“Brownstien等人(2024)对‘单剂量裸盖菇素和迷幻蘑菇提取物在SAPAP3类强迫症样过度自我梳理啮齿动物模型中的显著长期有益作用’的评论”
我们感谢加图索和同事[1]对我们论文[2]的友好评论。然而,我们希望指出关于我们的研究的一些不准确的陈述,并对他们的一些观察作出回应:1)我们在分析中没有考虑性别的论点是不正确的。相反,作为我们数据分析的第一步,我们比较了雄性和雌性SAPAP3-KO小鼠的自我梳理和头身抽搐。然后,我们分别分析了裸盖菇素治疗对男性和女性这些变量的影响。结果见补充表1和表2。在基线时,男性和女性之间没有差异,裸盖菇素治疗的效果也没有差异。因此,将雄性和雌性结合起来进行进一步分析。在我们对行为测试的分析中,性别也被考虑在内。2)我们的研究是按照病人的临床试验来设计和执行的。在患有强迫症和其他疾病的患者中,临床试验不包括一个手臂,让没有这种疾病的人接受治疗。因此,在我们的研究中不包括这样一个手臂不能被视为一个缺点。此外,强迫行为往往是以夸张的方式进行的正常行为。SAPAP3-KO小鼠的过度自我梳理也是如此。有趣的是,Gattusso等人在他们自己关于裸盖菇素对自我梳理的影响的论文中,发现了野生型小鼠服用裸盖菇素后自我梳理减少的证据。然而,没有使用裸盖菇素治疗的野生型组并不影响我们研究结果的有效性。同样,氟西汀减少非强迫症患者洗手频率的发现丝毫不影响氟西汀减少强迫性洗手的发现。3)Gattuso等人注意到,在我们对SAPAP3-KO小鼠的42天研究中,过度的自我梳理显著增加。6个月后自我梳理的逐渐增加绝不是加图索等人所暗示的,其他作者也注意到这一点。因此,Glorie等人对6-9个月大的SAPAP3-KO小鼠进行了研究,并报告称“随着年龄的增长,梳理毛发的时间会增加”。同样,Manning等人也报告了8个月大的婴儿自我梳理的逐渐增加。4) Gattuso et al. b[1]对我们研究的评论,很大程度上依赖于他们自己对裸盖菇素对SAPAP3-KO小鼠[3]自我梳理的影响的研究结果。我们很高兴这项工作重复了Brownstien等人的研究结果。然而,我们注意到,在他们的研究中,Gattuso等人对自我梳理进行了非常有限的评估,在10分钟的适应后仅对10分钟的行为进行了量化。在我们的研究b[2]中,我们对每只老鼠的自我梳理时间进行了整整一个小时的评分。为了确定10分钟自我梳理评估的有效性,我们评估了60只小鼠在1小时评估的第二个10分钟的自我梳理得分与整个小时的自我梳理得分之间的相关性。结果显示正相关(r = 0.53, p < 0.0001);然而,这低于0.80的r,这将为较短评估的有效性提供信心。5)我们完全同意Gattuso等人的观点[b] [b] [b] [b] [b] [b] [b] [b] [b] [b] [b] [b] [b] [b] [b] [b] [c] [c] [c] [c] [c] [c] [c] [c] [c] [c] [c] [c] [c]。这些评估也没有包括在他们自己的论文中。在我们的案例中,这些研究目前正在我们的实验室进行。认为我们在分析中没有考虑性别因素的观点是不正确的。相反,作为我们数据分析的第一步,我们比较了雄性和雌性SAPAP3-KO小鼠的自我梳理和头身抽搐。然后,我们分别分析了裸盖菇素治疗对男性和女性这些变量的影响。结果见补充表1和表2。在基线时,男性和女性之间没有差异,裸盖菇素治疗的效果也没有差异。因此,将雄性和雌性结合起来进行进一步分析。在我们对行为测试的分析中,性别也被考虑在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Psychiatry
Molecular Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
459
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Psychiatry focuses on publishing research that aims to uncover the biological mechanisms behind psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal emphasizes studies that bridge pre-clinical and clinical research, covering cellular, molecular, integrative, clinical, imaging, and psychopharmacology levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信