Frail Older Patients' Experiences During Boarding in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Charlotte Bjurbo, Ulrika Eriksson, Åsa Muntlin
{"title":"Frail Older Patients' Experiences During Boarding in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Charlotte Bjurbo, Ulrika Eriksson, Åsa Muntlin","doi":"10.1111/jan.70173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimTo explore how frail older patients experience their stay and nursing care during boarding time at the emergency department.DesignA qualitative explorative interview study.MethodPurposive sampling was used, with a two‐step selection process: (1) Patients 65 years or older spending at least 4 h at the emergency department waiting for a hospital bed, referred to as boarding time, were (2) screened for frailty using the FRail Elderly Support researcH group screening instrument. If screening identified a patient as frail, they were eligible for an interview. Individual semi‐structured interviews (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 19) were conducted during patients' boarding time at the emergency department. Data was collected between March and April 2019. The theoretical Fundamentals of Care framework shaped the interview guide. Interviews were transcribed and an inductive latent content analysis was performed.ResultsThe findings resulted in four main categories: Frail older patients felt <jats:italic>disregarded</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>defenceless</jats:italic>, and <jats:italic>resigned</jats:italic> during boarding time at the emergency department, yet also <jats:italic>hopeful</jats:italic>. The experience of hope resulted from confidence in the nurses, good nursing care, patience towards one's situation, and hope in emergency care.ConclusionThe frail older patient experienced boarding time in the emergency department through an overarching theme: ‘being left in no‐man's land in the emergency department but still feeling hopeful’. A trusting nurse–patient relationship, integrating the provision of fundamental care, is a favourable factor for the well‐being of the frail older patient.ImpactThe study addressed the increased number of older adults with complex health needs, coupled with overcrowded emergency departments. Frail older patients perceive the boarding time as being left in a ‘no‐man's‐land’, addressing unclear information and lack of caregiver responsibility. This highlights the need for tailored guidelines and care practices that promote person‐centred care and ensure safety for this vulnerable group in emergency settings.Patient or Public ContributionNot applicable.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimTo explore how frail older patients experience their stay and nursing care during boarding time at the emergency department.DesignA qualitative explorative interview study.MethodPurposive sampling was used, with a two‐step selection process: (1) Patients 65 years or older spending at least 4 h at the emergency department waiting for a hospital bed, referred to as boarding time, were (2) screened for frailty using the FRail Elderly Support researcH group screening instrument. If screening identified a patient as frail, they were eligible for an interview. Individual semi‐structured interviews (n = 19) were conducted during patients' boarding time at the emergency department. Data was collected between March and April 2019. The theoretical Fundamentals of Care framework shaped the interview guide. Interviews were transcribed and an inductive latent content analysis was performed.ResultsThe findings resulted in four main categories: Frail older patients felt disregarded, defenceless, and resigned during boarding time at the emergency department, yet also hopeful. The experience of hope resulted from confidence in the nurses, good nursing care, patience towards one's situation, and hope in emergency care.ConclusionThe frail older patient experienced boarding time in the emergency department through an overarching theme: ‘being left in no‐man's land in the emergency department but still feeling hopeful’. A trusting nurse–patient relationship, integrating the provision of fundamental care, is a favourable factor for the well‐being of the frail older patient.ImpactThe study addressed the increased number of older adults with complex health needs, coupled with overcrowded emergency departments. Frail older patients perceive the boarding time as being left in a ‘no‐man's‐land’, addressing unclear information and lack of caregiver responsibility. This highlights the need for tailored guidelines and care practices that promote person‐centred care and ensure safety for this vulnerable group in emergency settings.Patient or Public ContributionNot applicable.
老年体弱病人在急诊科住院期间的经历:一项质性研究
目的探讨体弱多病的老年患者在急诊科住院期间的护理体验。设计一个定性的探索性访谈研究。方法采用目的抽样,采用两步选择过程:(1)65岁或以上的患者在急诊科等待医院床位至少4小时,称为登机时间;(2)使用虚弱的老年人支持研究小组筛查工具进行虚弱筛查。如果筛查发现病人身体虚弱,他们就有资格接受面试。个别半结构化访谈(n = 19)在患者在急诊科住院期间进行。数据收集于2019年3月至4月。护理框架的理论基础塑造了访谈指南。对访谈进行转录,并进行归纳潜在内容分析。结果研究结果主要分为四类:体弱多病的老年患者在急诊科登机时感到被忽视、没有防御能力和辞职,但也有希望。希望的体验来自于对护士的信心,良好的护理,对自己情况的耐心,以及对急诊护理的希望。结论:体弱多病的老年患者在急诊科经历了一段寄宿时间,其主题是:“在急诊科被遗弃在无人区,但仍感到有希望”。一个信任的护患关系,整合基本护理的提供,是一个有利的因素,为身体虚弱的老年患者的福祉。影响该研究解决了有复杂健康需求的老年人数量增加以及急诊科人满为患的问题。体弱多病的老年患者认为登机时间被留在“无人地带”,导致信息不清,护理人员缺乏责任。这突出表明需要制定有针对性的指导方针和护理做法,促进以人为本的护理,并确保这一弱势群体在紧急情况下的安全。患者或公众捐款不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信