Adaptive Feedback in Digital Educational Games: An Explanatory Item Response Theory Approach

IF 4.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Febe Demedts, Sameh Said-Metwaly, Kristian Kiili, Manuel Ninaus, Antero Lindstedt, Bert Reynvoet, Delphine Sasanguie, Fien Depaepe
{"title":"Adaptive Feedback in Digital Educational Games: An Explanatory Item Response Theory Approach","authors":"Febe Demedts,&nbsp;Sameh Said-Metwaly,&nbsp;Kristian Kiili,&nbsp;Manuel Ninaus,&nbsp;Antero Lindstedt,&nbsp;Bert Reynvoet,&nbsp;Delphine Sasanguie,&nbsp;Fien Depaepe","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The potential of adaptive feedback in digital educational games remains largely unexplored. Fractions are a suitable topic for investigating the effectiveness of adaptive feedback, as the complexity of this domain highlights the need for adequate feedback.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study examines the effectiveness of explanatory adaptive feedback in a digital educational game to address two particular misconceptions regarding fractions (i.e., Natural Number Bias and Unit of Reference).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 197 4th graders were randomly assigned to two different conditions, each playing a different version of a digital educational game: one with corrective feedback and one with explanatory adaptive feedback. During gameplay, we collected log data of students' item-wise correctness and misconception errors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Explanatory item response analyses indicated that correctness improved in both game versions, with a more pronounced increase for the game with explanatory adaptive feedback compared to the game with corrective feedback. However, no decrease in misconception errors was observed in either game version. Moreover, neither the type of misconception nor students' prior fraction knowledge were moderating factors. These results suggest that adaptive feedback can support students in learning fractions; however, to reduce misconception errors concrete feedback should be optimised.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The potential of adaptive feedback in digital educational games remains largely unexplored. Fractions are a suitable topic for investigating the effectiveness of adaptive feedback, as the complexity of this domain highlights the need for adequate feedback.

Objectives

This study examines the effectiveness of explanatory adaptive feedback in a digital educational game to address two particular misconceptions regarding fractions (i.e., Natural Number Bias and Unit of Reference).

Methods

A total of 197 4th graders were randomly assigned to two different conditions, each playing a different version of a digital educational game: one with corrective feedback and one with explanatory adaptive feedback. During gameplay, we collected log data of students' item-wise correctness and misconception errors.

Results

Explanatory item response analyses indicated that correctness improved in both game versions, with a more pronounced increase for the game with explanatory adaptive feedback compared to the game with corrective feedback. However, no decrease in misconception errors was observed in either game version. Moreover, neither the type of misconception nor students' prior fraction knowledge were moderating factors. These results suggest that adaptive feedback can support students in learning fractions; however, to reduce misconception errors concrete feedback should be optimised.

数字教育游戏中的适应性反馈:一种解释性项目反应理论方法
在数字教育游戏中,自适应反馈的潜力仍未得到充分开发。分数是研究自适应反馈有效性的合适主题,因为该领域的复杂性突出了对充分反馈的需求。本研究考察了解释性自适应反馈在数字教育游戏中的有效性,以解决关于分数的两个特定误解(即自然数偏差和参考单位)。方法将197名四年级学生随机分为两组,每组玩一种不同版本的数字教育游戏:一种是纠正性反馈,一种是解释性自适应反馈。在游戏过程中,我们收集了学生的项目正确性和误解错误的日志数据。结果解释性项目反应分析表明,两种游戏版本的正确性都有所提高,具有解释性自适应反馈的游戏比具有纠正性反馈的游戏提高得更明显。然而,在两种游戏版本中,误解错误都没有减少。此外,误解类型和学生的先前分数知识都不是调节因素。这些结果表明,自适应反馈可以支持学生学习分数;然而,为了减少误解错误,应该优化具体反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信