Jennifer C. Stern, Heather V. Graham, Bradley Burcar, Emily S. Martin, Aaron Noell, Kevin Hand, Jeff S. Bowman, Peter Doran, Virginia Edgcomb, James F. Holden, Alta E. G. Howells, Michael J. Malaska, Brook L. Nunn, Jani Radebaugh, Laura E. Rodriguez, Schuyler Borges, Dina Bower, Samuel Courville, Melisa Diaz, Benjamin Hockman, Julie Huber, Justin Lawrence, Trista Vick-Majors, Conor A. Nixon, John R. Spear, Amanda V. Steckel, Anezina Solomonidou, Nicholas Schmerr, Britney Schmidt, Matthew O. Schrenk, Lauren Seyler, Amy R. Smith, Catherine C. Walker, Patrick Whelley, Natalie Wolfenbarger, Steven D. Vance
{"title":"A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Terrestrial Analogue Field Sites for Ocean Worlds","authors":"Jennifer C. Stern, Heather V. Graham, Bradley Burcar, Emily S. Martin, Aaron Noell, Kevin Hand, Jeff S. Bowman, Peter Doran, Virginia Edgcomb, James F. Holden, Alta E. G. Howells, Michael J. Malaska, Brook L. Nunn, Jani Radebaugh, Laura E. Rodriguez, Schuyler Borges, Dina Bower, Samuel Courville, Melisa Diaz, Benjamin Hockman, Julie Huber, Justin Lawrence, Trista Vick-Majors, Conor A. Nixon, John R. Spear, Amanda V. Steckel, Anezina Solomonidou, Nicholas Schmerr, Britney Schmidt, Matthew O. Schrenk, Lauren Seyler, Amy R. Smith, Catherine C. Walker, Patrick Whelley, Natalie Wolfenbarger, Steven D. Vance","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Field studies at terrestrial analogue sites represent an important contribution to the science of ocean worlds. The value of the science and technology investigations conducted at field analogue sites depends on the relevance of the analogue environment to the target ocean world. We accept that there are no perfect analogues for many of the unique environments represented by ocean worlds but suggest that a one-to-one matching of environmental characteristics and conditions is not crucial to the success or impact of the work. Instead, we must determine which processes and parameters are required to map directly to the target ocean world environment with high fidelity to address the science question. In this review paper, we discuss the outcomes of a workshop aimed at developing a new framework for evaluating the suitability of analogue field locations for ocean worlds research. Here we present a two-step approach to (a) identify the most crucial processes and parameters associated with a given science question and (b) assess the fidelity of these processes and parameters at a proposed field site to those expected for the target ocean world. We demonstrate this approach in a test case evaluating three types of ocean world analogue environments with respect to a science question. The consensus document presented here equips veteran and new investigators with valuable tools to better assess and justify their analogue site selections.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008803","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008803","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Field studies at terrestrial analogue sites represent an important contribution to the science of ocean worlds. The value of the science and technology investigations conducted at field analogue sites depends on the relevance of the analogue environment to the target ocean world. We accept that there are no perfect analogues for many of the unique environments represented by ocean worlds but suggest that a one-to-one matching of environmental characteristics and conditions is not crucial to the success or impact of the work. Instead, we must determine which processes and parameters are required to map directly to the target ocean world environment with high fidelity to address the science question. In this review paper, we discuss the outcomes of a workshop aimed at developing a new framework for evaluating the suitability of analogue field locations for ocean worlds research. Here we present a two-step approach to (a) identify the most crucial processes and parameters associated with a given science question and (b) assess the fidelity of these processes and parameters at a proposed field site to those expected for the target ocean world. We demonstrate this approach in a test case evaluating three types of ocean world analogue environments with respect to a science question. The consensus document presented here equips veteran and new investigators with valuable tools to better assess and justify their analogue site selections.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.