Julien Anract, Marie Florin, Laura Larnaudie, Michael Peyromaure, Nicolas Barry Delongchamps
{"title":"Hydrodissection using 10% dextrose before focal therapy of prostate cancer: Initial experience","authors":"Julien Anract, Marie Florin, Laura Larnaudie, Michael Peyromaure, Nicolas Barry Delongchamps","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the feasibility and safety of hydrodissection of the prostato-rectal space using 10% dextrose for focal therapy of posterior prostate tumours.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and methods</h3>\n \n <p>We included consecutive patients who underwent focal therapy for a posterior prostate tumour with a prior injection of 10% dextrose in the prostato-rectal space, between October 2024 and February 2025. The main outcomes were to evaluate the space created using this technique. As the technique used for hydrodissection was modelled on periprostatic nerve block, we analysed a cohort of patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsies with periprostatic nerve block using 20 ml of lidocaine, to compare the prostato-rectal spaces created by 10% dextrose and by lidocaine.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 11 patients underwent a focal therapy with a prior 20 ml 10% dextrose hydrodissection of the prostato-rectal space. Fifteen patients who underwent prostatic biopsies using a periprostatic nerve block (20 ml of lidocaine), with similar characteristics, were included. The median prostato-rectal space created with dextrose and with lidocaine was 8.9 [8.0; 9.9] and 6.7 [6.4; 8.4] mm, respectively (p = 0,17). The prostato-rectal space decreased slower with dextrose: 0.03 mm/min vs 0.1 mm/min (p = 0,02). The prostato-rectal space was higher at the end of focal therapy procedures (7.9 vs 6.6 mm, p = 0,033), despite a longer procedure time in focal therapy (37 vs 8 min, p < 0,001). At the end of focal therapy procedures, all patients had a prostato-rectal space > 5 mm. No hydrodissection-related adverse event was observed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These initial results suggest that hydrodissection of the prostate–rectal space using 20 ml 10% dextrose, injected following a standard periprostatic nerve block protocol, is feasible, reproducible and safe for a focal therapy procedure for localized posterior prostate tumours.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the feasibility and safety of hydrodissection of the prostato-rectal space using 10% dextrose for focal therapy of posterior prostate tumours.
Patients and methods
We included consecutive patients who underwent focal therapy for a posterior prostate tumour with a prior injection of 10% dextrose in the prostato-rectal space, between October 2024 and February 2025. The main outcomes were to evaluate the space created using this technique. As the technique used for hydrodissection was modelled on periprostatic nerve block, we analysed a cohort of patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsies with periprostatic nerve block using 20 ml of lidocaine, to compare the prostato-rectal spaces created by 10% dextrose and by lidocaine.
Results
A total of 11 patients underwent a focal therapy with a prior 20 ml 10% dextrose hydrodissection of the prostato-rectal space. Fifteen patients who underwent prostatic biopsies using a periprostatic nerve block (20 ml of lidocaine), with similar characteristics, were included. The median prostato-rectal space created with dextrose and with lidocaine was 8.9 [8.0; 9.9] and 6.7 [6.4; 8.4] mm, respectively (p = 0,17). The prostato-rectal space decreased slower with dextrose: 0.03 mm/min vs 0.1 mm/min (p = 0,02). The prostato-rectal space was higher at the end of focal therapy procedures (7.9 vs 6.6 mm, p = 0,033), despite a longer procedure time in focal therapy (37 vs 8 min, p < 0,001). At the end of focal therapy procedures, all patients had a prostato-rectal space > 5 mm. No hydrodissection-related adverse event was observed.
Conclusions
These initial results suggest that hydrodissection of the prostate–rectal space using 20 ml 10% dextrose, injected following a standard periprostatic nerve block protocol, is feasible, reproducible and safe for a focal therapy procedure for localized posterior prostate tumours.
目的探讨10%葡萄糖对前列腺直肠间隙进行水解剖治疗前列腺后部肿瘤的可行性和安全性。患者和方法我们纳入了2024年10月至2025年2月期间连续接受前列腺后部肿瘤局灶治疗并事先在前列腺直肠间隙注射10%葡萄糖的患者。主要结果是评估使用这种技术创造的空间。由于水解剖技术以前列腺周围神经阻滞为模型,我们分析了一组接受经会阴前列腺活检并使用20毫升利多卡因进行前列腺周围神经阻滞的患者,以比较10%葡萄糖和利多卡因造成的前列腺直肠间隙。结果11例患者均行局灶性前列腺直肠间隙10%葡萄糖水解剖20ml。采用前列腺周围神经阻滞(20ml利多卡因)进行前列腺活组织检查的15例患者具有相似的特征。葡萄糖组和利多卡因组的前列腺直肠正中间隙为8.9 [8.0];9.9]和6.7 [6.4];8.4] mm (p = 0,17)。葡萄糖组前列腺直肠间隙缩小较慢:0.03 mm/min vs 0.1 mm/min (p = 0.02)。局灶治疗结束时,前列腺直肠间隙增大(7.9 vs 6.6 mm, p = 0,033),尽管局灶治疗的手术时间较长(37 vs 8 min, p = 0,001)。在局灶性治疗过程结束时,所有患者的前列腺直肠间隙均为5mm。未观察到与水解剖相关的不良事件。这些初步结果表明,在标准的前列腺周围神经阻滞方案下,使用20ml 10%葡萄糖对前列腺直肠间隙进行水解剖,对于局限性前列腺后肿瘤的局灶治疗是可行的、可重复的和安全的。