Alvaro Assis de Souza, Dennis A. Hesselink, Carolien C. H. M. Maas, Andrew P. Stubbs, Marian Clahsen-van Groningen, Carla C. Baan, David van Klaveren, Karin Boer
{"title":"A Comprehensive Assessment of Plasma CXCL9 and CXCL10 in Improving Clinical Prediction Models for Kidney Allograft Rejection","authors":"Alvaro Assis de Souza, Dennis A. Hesselink, Carolien C. H. M. Maas, Andrew P. Stubbs, Marian Clahsen-van Groningen, Carla C. Baan, David van Klaveren, Karin Boer","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chemokine levels may predict kidney graft rejection. This study evaluated whether adding early plasma chemokines C-X-C motif ligand 9 (CXCL9) or chemokines C-X-C motif ligand 10 (CXCL10) measurements to a standard-of-care model improves the prediction of the need for antirejection treatment and helps guide biopsy decisions. The benchmark model used recipient and donor age, human leukocyte antigen mismatches, and dialysis need in the first 3 days after transplantation. Plasma CXCL9 or CXCL10 was added, and the extended models were evaluated using likelihood ratio tests (LRTs), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), flexible calibration curves, and net benefit analysis. Model internal validation was performed through bootstrapping. Among 163 consecutively transplanted recipients on standard immunosuppression, 43 (26.4%) required antirejection therapy between Days 3 and 21 posttransplant. The chemokine-extended models outperformed the benchmark (LRT <i>p</i> < 0.01), increasing discriminative ability (delta ROC-AUC of 0.02) and improving calibration. Across the range of risk thresholds for biopsy, the extended models provided better clinical utility, resulting in up to 17 fewer unnecessary biopsies per 100 patients. These findings suggest that adding plasma CXCL9 or CXCL10 to a benchmark model can improve patient care by reducing the number of biopsies in individuals unlikely to require antirejection therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70299","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chemokine levels may predict kidney graft rejection. This study evaluated whether adding early plasma chemokines C-X-C motif ligand 9 (CXCL9) or chemokines C-X-C motif ligand 10 (CXCL10) measurements to a standard-of-care model improves the prediction of the need for antirejection treatment and helps guide biopsy decisions. The benchmark model used recipient and donor age, human leukocyte antigen mismatches, and dialysis need in the first 3 days after transplantation. Plasma CXCL9 or CXCL10 was added, and the extended models were evaluated using likelihood ratio tests (LRTs), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), flexible calibration curves, and net benefit analysis. Model internal validation was performed through bootstrapping. Among 163 consecutively transplanted recipients on standard immunosuppression, 43 (26.4%) required antirejection therapy between Days 3 and 21 posttransplant. The chemokine-extended models outperformed the benchmark (LRT p < 0.01), increasing discriminative ability (delta ROC-AUC of 0.02) and improving calibration. Across the range of risk thresholds for biopsy, the extended models provided better clinical utility, resulting in up to 17 fewer unnecessary biopsies per 100 patients. These findings suggest that adding plasma CXCL9 or CXCL10 to a benchmark model can improve patient care by reducing the number of biopsies in individuals unlikely to require antirejection therapy.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.