Sirolimus Plus Low-Exposure Calcineurin Inhibitors as an Alternative Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Calcineurin Inhibitor-Intolerant Recipients: A Retrospective Study

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Yanfei Lu, Min Wu, Zhenbin Wei, Lingling Shi, Yongrong Lai, Rongrong Liu
{"title":"Sirolimus Plus Low-Exposure Calcineurin Inhibitors as an Alternative Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Calcineurin Inhibitor-Intolerant Recipients: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Yanfei Lu,&nbsp;Min Wu,&nbsp;Zhenbin Wei,&nbsp;Lingling Shi,&nbsp;Yongrong Lai,&nbsp;Rongrong Liu","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains a major barrier to long-term survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the cornerstone of GvHD prophylaxis, some patients cannot tolerate them, creating a critical need for alternative strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus plus low-exposure CNIs as an alternative GvHD prophylaxis in CNI-intolerant recipients undergoing allo-HSCT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analyzed 16 allo-HSCT recipients who received alternative GvHD prophylaxis due to CNI intolerance, evaluating GvHD incidence, survival and relapse outcomes, infectious complications, and immune reconstitution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median time to regimen initiation was 27.5 days (range, −2 to 114 days), and the median treatment duration was 53 days (range, 14–319 days). Only one patient (6.3%) experienced grade 2 acute GvHD, and none developed grade 3–4 acute GvHD. No cases of chronic GvHD were observed in the 15 evaluable patients. Over a median follow-up of 271 days (range, 58–505 days), one non-relapse mortality and three relapses (18.7%) occurred, with no relapse-related deaths. The alternative regimen was well-tolerated with manageable infections and, importantly, did not impair early T, B, or NK cell reconstitution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>For allo-HSCT recipients with CNI intolerance, this study provides the first evaluation of sirolimus combined with low-exposure CNIs as a GvHD prophylaxis. Our findings suggest this regimen is a promising and feasible alternative, although validation in larger, prospective studies is warranted.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains a major barrier to long-term survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the cornerstone of GvHD prophylaxis, some patients cannot tolerate them, creating a critical need for alternative strategies.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus plus low-exposure CNIs as an alternative GvHD prophylaxis in CNI-intolerant recipients undergoing allo-HSCT.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 16 allo-HSCT recipients who received alternative GvHD prophylaxis due to CNI intolerance, evaluating GvHD incidence, survival and relapse outcomes, infectious complications, and immune reconstitution.

Results

The median time to regimen initiation was 27.5 days (range, −2 to 114 days), and the median treatment duration was 53 days (range, 14–319 days). Only one patient (6.3%) experienced grade 2 acute GvHD, and none developed grade 3–4 acute GvHD. No cases of chronic GvHD were observed in the 15 evaluable patients. Over a median follow-up of 271 days (range, 58–505 days), one non-relapse mortality and three relapses (18.7%) occurred, with no relapse-related deaths. The alternative regimen was well-tolerated with manageable infections and, importantly, did not impair early T, B, or NK cell reconstitution.

Conclusion

For allo-HSCT recipients with CNI intolerance, this study provides the first evaluation of sirolimus combined with low-exposure CNIs as a GvHD prophylaxis. Our findings suggest this regimen is a promising and feasible alternative, although validation in larger, prospective studies is warranted.

西罗莫司加低暴露钙调磷酸酶抑制剂作为钙调磷酸酶抑制剂不耐受受体移植物抗宿主病预防的替代方法:一项回顾性研究
背景:移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)仍然是同种异体造血干细胞移植(alloo - hsct)术后长期存活的主要障碍。尽管钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNIs)是GvHD预防的基础,但一些患者不能耐受它们,因此迫切需要替代策略。目的评价西罗莫司联合低暴露CNIs在接受同种异体造血干细胞移植的cni不耐受受体中预防GvHD的有效性和安全性。方法回顾性分析16例因CNI不耐受而接受替代GvHD预防治疗的同种异体造血干细胞移植患者,评估GvHD发病率、生存和复发结局、感染并发症和免疫重建。结果中位方案启动时间为27.5天(范围:−2 ~ 114天),中位治疗持续时间为53天(范围:14 ~ 319天)。只有1例(6.3%)发生2级急性GvHD,没有一例发生3-4级急性GvHD。在15例可评估的患者中未观察到慢性GvHD病例。在中位随访271天(范围58-505天)期间,发生1例非复发死亡和3例复发(18.7%),无复发相关死亡。替代方案耐受性良好,感染可控,重要的是,不损害早期T, B或NK细胞重建。对于有CNI不耐受的同种异体造血干细胞移植受者,本研究首次评估了西罗莫司联合低暴露CNI作为GvHD预防的效果。我们的研究结果表明,该方案是一种有希望和可行的替代方案,尽管需要在更大规模的前瞻性研究中进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信