Localized hemodynamic assessment and rupture risk evaluation of intracranial aneurysms using the TESLA framework via computational fluid dynamics

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1002/mp.18071
Sajid Ali, Zhen-Ye Chen, Te-Chang Wu, Wei-Chien Huang, Tzu-Ching Shih
{"title":"Localized hemodynamic assessment and rupture risk evaluation of intracranial aneurysms using the TESLA framework via computational fluid dynamics","authors":"Sajid Ali,&nbsp;Zhen-Ye Chen,&nbsp;Te-Chang Wu,&nbsp;Wei-Chien Huang,&nbsp;Tzu-Ching Shih","doi":"10.1002/mp.18071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Intracranial aneurysms, particularly saccular types, are localized dilations of cerebral vessels prone to rupture, leading to life-threatening complications such as subarachnoid hemorrhage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to characterize the localized hemodynamic environment within the aneurysm dome and evaluate how spatial interactions among key flow parameters contribute to rupture risk, using a synergistic analytical framework.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We applied the targeted evaluation of synergistic links in aneurysms (TESLA) framework to analyze 18 intracranial aneurysms from 15 patients. Patient-specific vascular geometries were reconstructed from high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA), acquired using a 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner (MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens Healthineers) with a 20-channel head and neck coil. TOF-MRA employed a gradient-echo sequence leveraging the inflow effect to enhance signal intensity from flowing blood, obviating the need for contrast agents. Imaging parameters were: TR/TE = 24/7 ms, flip angle = 22°, field of view (FOV) = 230 × 200 mm<sup>2</sup>, matrix size = 320 × 196, 100 contiguous slices with a slice thickness of 0.7 mm, and voxel dimensions = 0.72 × 1.02 × 0.7 mm<sup>3</sup> (acquired) and 0.7 × 0.7 × 0.7 mm<sup>3</sup> (reconstructed isotropic). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed to wall shear stress (WSS), time-averaged WSS (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), pressure gradient (PG), and vorticity. A standardized pulsatile inflow waveform (mean flow rate: 275 mL min<sup>−1</sup>) was applied uniformly at the inlet of each model. Outflow boundary conditions assumed constant pressure at distal locations, with resistance equalization via extension segments. Hemodynamic parameters were compared between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The CFD analysis of 18 intracranial aneurysms revealed marked hemodynamic heterogeneity within the aneurysm dome, with WSS ranging from an average of 0.7042 Pa in low-stress zones associated with stagnant flow to peaks of 54.0371 Pa in high-stress regions indicative of mechanical strain, while TAWSS averaged 12.4875 Pa with maximum values reaching 25.9159 Pa, highlighting localized stress amplifications. Vorticity averaged 2,422.34 s<sup>−1</sup> with peaks up to 4,645.50 s<sup>−1</sup>, reflecting turbulent and recirculating flow, complemented by an OSI averaging 0.4557 and peaking at 0.4952, and RRT averaging 6.2278 Pa<sup>−1</sup>, both signifying oscillatory flow and stagnation linked to increased wall vulnerability. Comparative analysis between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms demonstrated markedly higher maximum values of WSS, TAWSS, OSI, PGs, and vorticity (averaging 33,635.322 Pa m<sup>−1</sup> and peaking at 47,390.5 Pa m<sup>−1</sup>) in ruptured cases, alongside elevated RRT, underscoring the association of extreme hemodynamic disturbances with rupture risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The TESLA framework effectively captured localized hemodynamic extremes—elevated stress, oscillatory flow, and prolonged residence time—that were more pronounced in ruptured aneurysms. These findings support TESLA's utility in improving rupture risk assessment and guiding personalized clinical management.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.18071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intracranial aneurysms, particularly saccular types, are localized dilations of cerebral vessels prone to rupture, leading to life-threatening complications such as subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Purpose

This study aimed to characterize the localized hemodynamic environment within the aneurysm dome and evaluate how spatial interactions among key flow parameters contribute to rupture risk, using a synergistic analytical framework.

Methods

We applied the targeted evaluation of synergistic links in aneurysms (TESLA) framework to analyze 18 intracranial aneurysms from 15 patients. Patient-specific vascular geometries were reconstructed from high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA), acquired using a 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner (MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens Healthineers) with a 20-channel head and neck coil. TOF-MRA employed a gradient-echo sequence leveraging the inflow effect to enhance signal intensity from flowing blood, obviating the need for contrast agents. Imaging parameters were: TR/TE = 24/7 ms, flip angle = 22°, field of view (FOV) = 230 × 200 mm2, matrix size = 320 × 196, 100 contiguous slices with a slice thickness of 0.7 mm, and voxel dimensions = 0.72 × 1.02 × 0.7 mm3 (acquired) and 0.7 × 0.7 × 0.7 mm3 (reconstructed isotropic). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed to wall shear stress (WSS), time-averaged WSS (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), pressure gradient (PG), and vorticity. A standardized pulsatile inflow waveform (mean flow rate: 275 mL min−1) was applied uniformly at the inlet of each model. Outflow boundary conditions assumed constant pressure at distal locations, with resistance equalization via extension segments. Hemodynamic parameters were compared between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms.

Results

The CFD analysis of 18 intracranial aneurysms revealed marked hemodynamic heterogeneity within the aneurysm dome, with WSS ranging from an average of 0.7042 Pa in low-stress zones associated with stagnant flow to peaks of 54.0371 Pa in high-stress regions indicative of mechanical strain, while TAWSS averaged 12.4875 Pa with maximum values reaching 25.9159 Pa, highlighting localized stress amplifications. Vorticity averaged 2,422.34 s−1 with peaks up to 4,645.50 s−1, reflecting turbulent and recirculating flow, complemented by an OSI averaging 0.4557 and peaking at 0.4952, and RRT averaging 6.2278 Pa−1, both signifying oscillatory flow and stagnation linked to increased wall vulnerability. Comparative analysis between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms demonstrated markedly higher maximum values of WSS, TAWSS, OSI, PGs, and vorticity (averaging 33,635.322 Pa m−1 and peaking at 47,390.5 Pa m−1) in ruptured cases, alongside elevated RRT, underscoring the association of extreme hemodynamic disturbances with rupture risk.

Conclusion

The TESLA framework effectively captured localized hemodynamic extremes—elevated stress, oscillatory flow, and prolonged residence time—that were more pronounced in ruptured aneurysms. These findings support TESLA's utility in improving rupture risk assessment and guiding personalized clinical management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于计算流体动力学的TESLA框架颅内动脉瘤局部血流动力学评估及破裂风险评估
颅内动脉瘤,尤其是囊状动脉瘤,是一种易于破裂的脑血管局部扩张,可导致危及生命的并发症,如蛛网膜下腔出血。本研究旨在描述动脉瘤穹窿内局部血流动力学环境,并利用协同分析框架评估关键血流参数之间的空间相互作用如何导致破裂风险。方法应用特斯拉框架对15例颅内动脉瘤患者的18个动脉瘤进行分析。使用1.5T磁共振成像(MRI)扫描仪(MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens Healthineers)和20通道头颈部线圈,通过高分辨率三维(3D)飞行时间磁共振血管造影(TOF-MRA)重建患者特定的血管几何形状。TOF-MRA采用梯度回波序列,利用流入效应来增强流动血液的信号强度,从而避免了对造影剂的需要。成像参数为:TR/TE = 24/ 7ms,翻转角度= 22°,视场(FOV) = 230 × 200 mm2,矩阵尺寸= 320 × 196, 100个连续切片,切片厚度为0.7 mm,体素尺寸= 0.72 × 1.02 × 0.7 mm3(获取)和0.7 × 0.7 × 0.7 mm3(重建各向同性)。计算流体力学(CFD)模拟了壁面剪切应力(WSS)、时间平均剪切应力(TAWSS)、振荡剪切指数(OSI)、相对停留时间(RRT)、压力梯度(PG)和涡度。在每个模型的入口均匀施加标准化的脉冲流入波形(平均流量:275 mL min - 1)。流出边界条件在远端位置假定恒定压力,通过延伸段实现阻力均衡。比较破裂动脉瘤与未破裂动脉瘤的血流动力学参数。结果对18例颅内动脉瘤进行CFD分析,发现动脉瘤穹内血流动力学异质性明显,低应力区WSS平均值为0.7042 Pa,与血流停滞有关,高应力区WSS峰值为54.0371 Pa,与机械应变有关,TAWSS平均值为12.4875 Pa,最大值为25.9159 Pa,突出局部应力放大。涡量平均为2,422.34 s−1,峰值可达4,645.50 s−1,反映了湍流和再循环流动,OSI平均为0.4557,峰值为0.4952,RRT平均为6.2278 Pa−1,两者都表明与壁面脆弱性增加有关的振荡流动和停滞。动脉瘤破裂与未破裂的对比分析显示,破裂病例的WSS、TAWSS、OSI、pg和涡度(平均33,635.322 Pa m−1,峰值47,390.5 Pa m−1)的最大值明显更高,同时RRT升高,强调了极端血流动力学紊乱与破裂风险的关联。结论特斯拉框架能有效捕捉局部血流动力学极值——应力升高、振荡血流和停留时间延长,这些在破裂动脉瘤中更为明显。这些发现支持了特斯拉在改善破裂风险评估和指导个性化临床管理方面的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信