Nonlinear Cauchy Elasticity

IF 2.4 1区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Arash Yavari, Alain Goriely
{"title":"Nonlinear Cauchy Elasticity","authors":"Arash Yavari,&nbsp;Alain Goriely","doi":"10.1007/s00205-025-02120-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most theories and applications of elasticity rely on an energy function that depends on the strains from which the stresses can be derived. This is the traditional setting of Green elasticity, also known as hyper-elasticity. However, in its original form the theory of elasticity does not assume the existence of a strain energy function. In this case, called Cauchy elasticity, stresses are directly related to the strains. Since the emergence of modern elasticity in the 1940s, research on Cauchy elasticity has been relatively limited. One possible reason for this is that for Cauchy materials, the net work performed by stress along a closed path in the strain space may be nonzero. Therefore, such materials may require access to both energy sources and sinks. This characteristic has led some mechanicians to question the viability of Cauchy elasticity as a physically plausible theory of elasticity. In this paper, motivated by its relevance to recent applications, such as the modeling of active solids, we revisit Cauchy elasticity in a modern form. First, we show that in the general theory of anisotropic Cauchy elasticity, stress can be expressed in terms of six functions, that we call <i>Edelen-Darboux potentials</i>. For isotropic Cauchy materials, this number reduces to three, while for incompressible isotropic Cauchy elasticity, only two such potentials are required. Second, we show that in Cauchy elasticity, the link between balance laws and symmetries is lost, in general, since Noether’s theorem does not apply. In particular, we show that, unlike hyperleasticity, objectivity is not equivalent to the balance of angular momentum. Third, we formulate the balance laws of Cauchy elasticity covariantly and derive a generalized Doyle–Ericksen formula. Fourth, the material symmetry and work theorems of Cauchy elasticity are revisited, based on the <i>stress-work 1-form</i> that emerges as a fundamental quantity in Cauchy elasticity. The stress-work 1-form allows for a classification via Darboux’s theorem that leads to a classification of Cauchy elastic solids based on their generalized energy functions. Fifth, we discuss the relevance of Carathéodory’s theorem on accessibility property of Pfaffian equations. Sixth, we show that Cauchy elasticity has an intrinsic geometric hystresis, which is the net work of stress in cyclic deformations. If the orientation of a cyclic deformation is reversed, the sign of the net work of stress changes, from which we conclude that stress in Cauchy elasticity is neither dissipative nor conservative. Seventh, we establish connections between Cauchy elasticity and the existing constitutive equations for active solids. Eighth, linear anisotropic Cauchy elasticity is examined in detail, and simple displacement-control loadings are proposed for each symmetry class to characterize the corresponding antisymmetric elastic constants. Ninth, we discuss both isotropic and anisotropic Cauchy anelasticity and show that the existing solutions for stress fields of distributed eigenstrains (and particularly defects) in hyperelastic solids can be readily extended to Cauchy elasticity. Tenth, we introduce Cosserat–Cauchy materials and demonstrate that an anisotropic three-dimensional Cosserat–Cauchy elastic solid has at most twenty four generalized energy functions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55484,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis","volume":"249 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00205-025-02120-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00205-025-02120-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most theories and applications of elasticity rely on an energy function that depends on the strains from which the stresses can be derived. This is the traditional setting of Green elasticity, also known as hyper-elasticity. However, in its original form the theory of elasticity does not assume the existence of a strain energy function. In this case, called Cauchy elasticity, stresses are directly related to the strains. Since the emergence of modern elasticity in the 1940s, research on Cauchy elasticity has been relatively limited. One possible reason for this is that for Cauchy materials, the net work performed by stress along a closed path in the strain space may be nonzero. Therefore, such materials may require access to both energy sources and sinks. This characteristic has led some mechanicians to question the viability of Cauchy elasticity as a physically plausible theory of elasticity. In this paper, motivated by its relevance to recent applications, such as the modeling of active solids, we revisit Cauchy elasticity in a modern form. First, we show that in the general theory of anisotropic Cauchy elasticity, stress can be expressed in terms of six functions, that we call Edelen-Darboux potentials. For isotropic Cauchy materials, this number reduces to three, while for incompressible isotropic Cauchy elasticity, only two such potentials are required. Second, we show that in Cauchy elasticity, the link between balance laws and symmetries is lost, in general, since Noether’s theorem does not apply. In particular, we show that, unlike hyperleasticity, objectivity is not equivalent to the balance of angular momentum. Third, we formulate the balance laws of Cauchy elasticity covariantly and derive a generalized Doyle–Ericksen formula. Fourth, the material symmetry and work theorems of Cauchy elasticity are revisited, based on the stress-work 1-form that emerges as a fundamental quantity in Cauchy elasticity. The stress-work 1-form allows for a classification via Darboux’s theorem that leads to a classification of Cauchy elastic solids based on their generalized energy functions. Fifth, we discuss the relevance of Carathéodory’s theorem on accessibility property of Pfaffian equations. Sixth, we show that Cauchy elasticity has an intrinsic geometric hystresis, which is the net work of stress in cyclic deformations. If the orientation of a cyclic deformation is reversed, the sign of the net work of stress changes, from which we conclude that stress in Cauchy elasticity is neither dissipative nor conservative. Seventh, we establish connections between Cauchy elasticity and the existing constitutive equations for active solids. Eighth, linear anisotropic Cauchy elasticity is examined in detail, and simple displacement-control loadings are proposed for each symmetry class to characterize the corresponding antisymmetric elastic constants. Ninth, we discuss both isotropic and anisotropic Cauchy anelasticity and show that the existing solutions for stress fields of distributed eigenstrains (and particularly defects) in hyperelastic solids can be readily extended to Cauchy elasticity. Tenth, we introduce Cosserat–Cauchy materials and demonstrate that an anisotropic three-dimensional Cosserat–Cauchy elastic solid has at most twenty four generalized energy functions.

非线性柯西弹性
弹性的大多数理论和应用都依赖于一个能量函数,而能量函数依赖于可以推导出应力的应变。这是传统设定的绿色弹性,也称为超弹性。然而,在其原始形式中,弹性理论并没有假设应变能函数的存在。在这种情况下,称为柯西弹性,应力与应变直接相关。自20世纪40年代现代弹性理论出现以来,对柯西弹性的研究相对有限。一个可能的原因是,对于柯西材料,应力沿封闭路径在应变空间中所做的净功可能是非零的。因此,这些材料可能需要获得能源和汇。这一特点导致一些力学家质疑柯西弹性作为一种物理上可信的弹性理论的可行性。在本文中,由于其与最近应用的相关性,例如活性固体的建模,我们以现代形式重新审视柯西弹性。首先,我们证明了在各向异性柯西弹性的一般理论中,应力可以用六个函数来表示,我们称之为埃德伦-达布势。对于各向同性柯西材料,这个数字减少到三个,而对于不可压缩的各向同性柯西弹性,只需要两个这样的势。其次,我们表明,在柯西弹性中,平衡定律和对称性之间的联系通常是丢失的,因为诺特定理不适用。特别地,我们证明了,与超弹性不同,客观性并不等同于角动量的平衡。第三,对柯西弹性平衡规律进行协变表述,推导出广义的Doyle-Ericksen公式。第四,基于作为柯西弹性的基本量出现的应力-功- 1形式,重新审视了柯西弹性的材料对称性和功定理。应力-功- 1形式允许通过达布定理进行分类,该定理根据柯西弹性固体的广义能量函数进行分类。第五,讨论了carathacimodory定理与Pfaffian方程可及性的相关性。第六,我们证明了柯西弹性具有内在的几何滞后,它是循环变形中的应力网。如果循环变形的方向相反,则应力网的符号发生变化,由此我们得出柯西弹性中的应力既不是耗散的,也不是保守的。第七,我们建立了柯西弹性和现有的活性固体本构方程之间的联系。第八,详细研究了线性各向异性柯西弹性,并对每个对称类提出了简单的位移控制载荷,以表征相应的反对称弹性常数。第九,我们讨论了各向同性和各向异性柯西非弹性,并证明了超弹性固体中分布特征应变(特别是缺陷)应力场的现有解可以很容易地推广到柯西弹性。第十,我们引入了Cosserat-Cauchy材料,并证明了各向异性三维Cosserat-Cauchy弹性固体最多有24个广义能量函数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis nourishes the discipline of mechanics as a deductive, mathematical science in the classical tradition and promotes analysis, particularly in the context of application. Its purpose is to give rapid and full publication to research of exceptional moment, depth and permanence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信