Agroecosystem services and disservices in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China: Spatial heterogeneity, trade-off relationships, and driving mechanisms

IF 5.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Yuhan Ren , Guangji Fang , Xiao Sun , Yanhua He , Chenrui Wang , Junwei Gu , Zhe Feng
{"title":"Agroecosystem services and disservices in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China: Spatial heterogeneity, trade-off relationships, and driving mechanisms","authors":"Yuhan Ren ,&nbsp;Guangji Fang ,&nbsp;Xiao Sun ,&nbsp;Yanhua He ,&nbsp;Chenrui Wang ,&nbsp;Junwei Gu ,&nbsp;Zhe Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agricultural ecosystems provide essential material provisions and enhance human well-being, yet their negative impacts cannot be neglected. Understanding the interactions between these agroecosystem services (AESs) and disservices (AEDSs), along with their driving mechanisms can facilitate more sustainable agroecosystem management. In this study, 12 typical indicators of AESs and AEDSs were selected and quantified in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region of China in 2020. The root mean standard deviation was then used to explore their trade-offs. The natural–social drivers of trade-offs were finally analyzed using redundancy analysis and geographically weighted regression. Results showed food production and climate regulation exhibited higher AES values, while water resource consumption and soil pollution showed higher AEDS values, mainly in contiguous cropland areas. Synergy occurred in 28 % of the region among AESs, 31 % among AEDSs, and 36 % among AESs and AEDSs, indicating that the improvement of AESs often spatially coincides with harmful costs of disservices, posing enormous challenges for win-win management and policy-making. Socioeconomic drivers, particularly agricultural mechanization and road density had greater influence on AES–AEDS interactions than natural factors. By explicitly incorporating disservices into trade-off analysis, these findings provide a scientific basis for agroecosystem management, emphasizing the need to prioritize human-activity and technology-driven socioeconomic factors while enhancing ecosystem services and reducing disservices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 103767"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622825002620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural ecosystems provide essential material provisions and enhance human well-being, yet their negative impacts cannot be neglected. Understanding the interactions between these agroecosystem services (AESs) and disservices (AEDSs), along with their driving mechanisms can facilitate more sustainable agroecosystem management. In this study, 12 typical indicators of AESs and AEDSs were selected and quantified in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region of China in 2020. The root mean standard deviation was then used to explore their trade-offs. The natural–social drivers of trade-offs were finally analyzed using redundancy analysis and geographically weighted regression. Results showed food production and climate regulation exhibited higher AES values, while water resource consumption and soil pollution showed higher AEDS values, mainly in contiguous cropland areas. Synergy occurred in 28 % of the region among AESs, 31 % among AEDSs, and 36 % among AESs and AEDSs, indicating that the improvement of AESs often spatially coincides with harmful costs of disservices, posing enormous challenges for win-win management and policy-making. Socioeconomic drivers, particularly agricultural mechanization and road density had greater influence on AES–AEDS interactions than natural factors. By explicitly incorporating disservices into trade-off analysis, these findings provide a scientific basis for agroecosystem management, emphasizing the need to prioritize human-activity and technology-driven socioeconomic factors while enhancing ecosystem services and reducing disservices.
京津冀地区农业生态系统服务与损害:空间异质性、权衡关系及驱动机制
农业生态系统提供了必要的物质供应并增进了人类福祉,但其负面影响也不容忽视。了解这些农业生态系统服务(AESs)和危害(AEDSs)之间的相互作用及其驱动机制可以促进更可持续的农业生态系统管理。本研究选取了2020年中国京津冀地区12个AESs和AEDSs的典型指标并进行了量化。然后使用均方根标准差来探索它们的权衡。最后利用冗余分析和地理加权回归分析了权衡的自然社会驱动因素。结果表明,粮食生产和气候调控表现出较高的AES值,水资源消耗和土壤污染表现出较高的AES值,且主要集中在连片耕地地区。该地区28%的AESs、31%的AESs和36%的AESs与aeds之间存在协同效应,这表明AESs的改善在空间上往往与服务损害的有害成本相吻合,为双赢管理和决策带来了巨大挑战。社会经济驱动因素,特别是农业机械化和道路密度对aes - ads相互作用的影响大于自然因素。通过明确将危害纳入权衡分析,这些发现为农业生态系统管理提供了科学依据,强调了在加强生态系统服务和减少危害的同时,需要优先考虑人类活动和技术驱动的社会经济因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Geography
Applied Geography GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信