Comparative analysis of a 5G campus network and existing networks for real-time consultation in remote pathology

Q2 Medicine
Ilgar I. Guseinov, Arnab Bhowmik, Somaia AbuBaker, Anna E. Schmaus-Klughammer, Thomas Spittler
{"title":"Comparative analysis of a 5G campus network and existing networks for real-time consultation in remote pathology","authors":"Ilgar I. Guseinov,&nbsp;Arnab Bhowmik,&nbsp;Somaia AbuBaker,&nbsp;Anna E. Schmaus-Klughammer,&nbsp;Thomas Spittler","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid advancements in digital pathology, particularly in whole-slide imaging (WSI), have transformed remote histological analysis by enabling high-resolution digitization and real-time consultations. However, these workflows place significant demands on network infrastructure, requiring high bandwidth, low latency, and consistent performance. Whereas 5G networks have been extensively studied in controlled lab environments, their real-world applications in clinical settings remain underexplored.</div><div>This study provides a comparative analysis of 5G Campus Networks (5G CN) and traditional institutional networks, focusing on their performance during remote pathology tasks. Key metrics such as throughput, latency, and image quality were evaluated under various device loads to simulate real-world conditions. Although 5G CN did not consistently outperform in absolute throughput, it demonstrated superior adaptability, lower latency, and reduced variability, ensuring stable performance even with increasing network demand. These attributes are critical for time-sensitive workflows like frozen section analysis, where reliability and speed are paramount.</div><div>The findings highlight the potential of 5G CN to support emerging digital pathology applications, including real-time consultation. Furthermore, the study underscores the need for future research on 5G slicing and its ability to optimize network resources for high-demand medical applications. This work provides valuable insights into optimizing network infrastructure for the evolving demands of remote diagnostics in digital pathology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S215335392500029X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid advancements in digital pathology, particularly in whole-slide imaging (WSI), have transformed remote histological analysis by enabling high-resolution digitization and real-time consultations. However, these workflows place significant demands on network infrastructure, requiring high bandwidth, low latency, and consistent performance. Whereas 5G networks have been extensively studied in controlled lab environments, their real-world applications in clinical settings remain underexplored.
This study provides a comparative analysis of 5G Campus Networks (5G CN) and traditional institutional networks, focusing on their performance during remote pathology tasks. Key metrics such as throughput, latency, and image quality were evaluated under various device loads to simulate real-world conditions. Although 5G CN did not consistently outperform in absolute throughput, it demonstrated superior adaptability, lower latency, and reduced variability, ensuring stable performance even with increasing network demand. These attributes are critical for time-sensitive workflows like frozen section analysis, where reliability and speed are paramount.
The findings highlight the potential of 5G CN to support emerging digital pathology applications, including real-time consultation. Furthermore, the study underscores the need for future research on 5G slicing and its ability to optimize network resources for high-demand medical applications. This work provides valuable insights into optimizing network infrastructure for the evolving demands of remote diagnostics in digital pathology.
5G校园网与现有远程病理实时会诊网络的对比分析
数字病理学的快速发展,特别是在全切片成像(WSI)方面,通过实现高分辨率数字化和实时咨询,改变了远程组织学分析。然而,这些工作流对网络基础设施提出了很高的要求,需要高带宽、低延迟和一致的性能。尽管5G网络已在受控实验室环境中进行了广泛研究,但其在临床环境中的实际应用仍未得到充分探索。本研究提供了5G校园网(5G CN)和传统机构网络的比较分析,重点关注它们在远程病理任务中的表现。在各种设备负载下评估吞吐量、延迟和图像质量等关键指标,以模拟现实世界的条件。虽然5G CN在绝对吞吐量方面并不总是优于其他国家,但它表现出了卓越的适应性、更低的延迟和更少的可变性,即使在网络需求不断增加的情况下也能确保稳定的性能。这些属性对于时间敏感的工作流程(如冻结切片分析)至关重要,因为可靠性和速度是至关重要的。研究结果强调了5G网络在支持新兴数字病理学应用(包括实时咨询)方面的潜力。此外,该研究强调了未来对5G切片及其优化网络资源的能力进行研究的必要性,以满足高需求的医疗应用。这项工作为优化网络基础设施提供了宝贵的见解,以满足数字病理学中远程诊断的不断发展的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信