Intracranial pressure changes during early postoperative mobilization in patients with chronic subdural hematoma

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anders Schack MD, Markus Harboe Olsen MD, PhD, Jonathan Truels Hansen BSc, Anna Søgaard Magnussen MD, Ida Møller Larsen RN-ICU, BSc, Helene Ravnholt Jensen RN-ICU, CSci-Health, Marianne Juhler MD, DMSc, Alexander Lilja-Cyron MD, PhD, Kåre Fugleholm MD, PhD, DMSc, Thorbjørn Søren Rønn Jensen MD, PhD
{"title":"Intracranial pressure changes during early postoperative mobilization in patients with chronic subdural hematoma","authors":"Anders Schack MD,&nbsp;Markus Harboe Olsen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jonathan Truels Hansen BSc,&nbsp;Anna Søgaard Magnussen MD,&nbsp;Ida Møller Larsen RN-ICU, BSc,&nbsp;Helene Ravnholt Jensen RN-ICU, CSci-Health,&nbsp;Marianne Juhler MD, DMSc,&nbsp;Alexander Lilja-Cyron MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kåre Fugleholm MD, PhD, DMSc,&nbsp;Thorbjørn Søren Rønn Jensen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1007/s00701-025-06655-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Passive subdural drainage is used to reduce the risk of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) recurrence and mortality. However, the effects of patient positioning on intracranial pressure (ICP) during passive drainage remain unclear.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine how subdural drainage and patient positions influence postoperative ICP in cSDH patients with a subdural passive drainage system.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a prospective, single-center observational cohort study. Eleven patients (mean age 78 years) underwent burr hole evacuation for cSDH with placement of a subdural drain connected to a bile bag system. An ICP probe was placed in the subdural space posteriorly via the same burr hole. During the first 48 h, ICP was measured in supine, 30° head elevation, and sitting positions before and after removal of the subdural drain. Given the small sample size, the study was a priori considered hypothesis‑generating; the width of confidence intervals and potential type II error are therefore emphasised throughout. Also, the associations between ICP and radiographic parameters (midline shift, hematoma size, pneumocephalus) were assessed.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>When all positions were combined, mean ICP with the drain in situ was − 2.5 (− 4.8 to − 0.2) mmHg versus − 0.5 (− 2.9 to 1.9) mmHg after removal (<i>p</i> = 0.233). Position-specific differences after vs before removal were likewise small and non-significant: supine -1.9 (-7.8 to 4.1, <i>p</i> = 0.537), 30° -2.6 mmHg (-8.5 to 3.3, <i>p</i> = 0.378), sitting -3.6 (-9.8 to 2.6, <i>p</i> = 0.244) mmHg; mixed-effects modelling confirmed these findings.</p><p>Greater midline shift and hematoma volume were associated with higher ICP, whereas larger pneumocephalus volumes correlated with lower ICP.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>After burr-hole evacuation of cSDH, ICP remained within normal physiological limits across all head positions, both with the subdural drain in situ and after its routine removal at 24 h. Providing that the drainage height is adjusted to the pivot point for CSF pressure at shoulder level, mobilization—even to the upright position—did not provoke dangerously low ICP. These data, together with emerging randomised evidence, support early mobilisation after cSDH surgery; nonetheless, confirmation in adequately powered multicentre trials is required before firm practice recommendations can be issued.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06655-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06655-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Passive subdural drainage is used to reduce the risk of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) recurrence and mortality. However, the effects of patient positioning on intracranial pressure (ICP) during passive drainage remain unclear.

Objective

To examine how subdural drainage and patient positions influence postoperative ICP in cSDH patients with a subdural passive drainage system.

Methods

This was a prospective, single-center observational cohort study. Eleven patients (mean age 78 years) underwent burr hole evacuation for cSDH with placement of a subdural drain connected to a bile bag system. An ICP probe was placed in the subdural space posteriorly via the same burr hole. During the first 48 h, ICP was measured in supine, 30° head elevation, and sitting positions before and after removal of the subdural drain. Given the small sample size, the study was a priori considered hypothesis‑generating; the width of confidence intervals and potential type II error are therefore emphasised throughout. Also, the associations between ICP and radiographic parameters (midline shift, hematoma size, pneumocephalus) were assessed.

Results

When all positions were combined, mean ICP with the drain in situ was − 2.5 (− 4.8 to − 0.2) mmHg versus − 0.5 (− 2.9 to 1.9) mmHg after removal (p = 0.233). Position-specific differences after vs before removal were likewise small and non-significant: supine -1.9 (-7.8 to 4.1, p = 0.537), 30° -2.6 mmHg (-8.5 to 3.3, p = 0.378), sitting -3.6 (-9.8 to 2.6, p = 0.244) mmHg; mixed-effects modelling confirmed these findings.

Greater midline shift and hematoma volume were associated with higher ICP, whereas larger pneumocephalus volumes correlated with lower ICP.

Conclusions

After burr-hole evacuation of cSDH, ICP remained within normal physiological limits across all head positions, both with the subdural drain in situ and after its routine removal at 24 h. Providing that the drainage height is adjusted to the pivot point for CSF pressure at shoulder level, mobilization—even to the upright position—did not provoke dangerously low ICP. These data, together with emerging randomised evidence, support early mobilisation after cSDH surgery; nonetheless, confirmation in adequately powered multicentre trials is required before firm practice recommendations can be issued.

慢性硬膜下血肿患者术后早期活动时的颅内压变化
被动硬膜下引流术用于降低慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDH)复发和死亡的风险。然而,在被动引流过程中,患者体位对颅内压(ICP)的影响尚不清楚。目的探讨硬膜下被动引流对cSDH患者术后颅内压的影响。方法本研究为前瞻性、单中心观察队列研究。11例患者(平均年龄78岁)接受了cSDH的钻孔引流术,并将硬膜下引流管连接到胆囊袋系统。颅内压探头经同一钻孔置于后侧硬膜下空间。在取出硬膜下引流管前后的48小时内,分别在仰卧位、头部抬高30°和坐位测量颅内压。由于样本量小,该研究被认为是先验的假设生成;因此,本文自始至终强调置信区间的宽度和潜在的II型误差。此外,还评估了ICP与影像学参数(中线移位、血肿大小、脑积水)之间的关系。结果当所有位置合并时,平均ICP与引流管原位相比为- 2.5(- 4.8至- 0.2)mmHg,而取出后为- 0.5(- 2.9至1.9)mmHg (p = 0.233)。手术后与手术前的位置特异性差异同样很小且不显著:仰卧位-1.9(-7.8至4.1,p = 0.537), 30°-2.6 mmHg(-8.5至3.3,p = 0.378),坐位-3.6(-9.8至2.6,p = 0.244) mmHg;混合效应模型证实了这些发现。较大的中线移位和血肿体积与较高的颅内压相关,而较大的气头体积与较低的颅内压相关。结论:颅内压钻孔引流后,颅内压在所有头部位置均保持在正常的生理范围内,无论是硬膜下引流原位还是在24小时后常规取出。如果将引流高度调整到肩关节水平的脑脊液压力枢轴点,则活动-即使是直立位置-也不会引起危险的低颅内压。这些数据,连同新出现的随机证据,支持cSDH手术后早期活动;尽管如此,在发布确定的实践建议之前,需要在充分支持的多中心试验中得到确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信