Ivan Alves dos Santos, Milene Farias de Souza, Bruna Shaienny Marques Campos, Aldeize Viana Silva, Reinilza Cardoso dos Santos, Iago Lima Magalhães, Mayse da Silva Malcher, Zaqueu dos Santos, Paulo Sérgio Taube, Ruy Bessa Lopes, Tulio Silva Lara
{"title":"Assessment of the early growth of Amazonian forest tree species under exposure to pesticides","authors":"Ivan Alves dos Santos, Milene Farias de Souza, Bruna Shaienny Marques Campos, Aldeize Viana Silva, Reinilza Cardoso dos Santos, Iago Lima Magalhães, Mayse da Silva Malcher, Zaqueu dos Santos, Paulo Sérgio Taube, Ruy Bessa Lopes, Tulio Silva Lara","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01296-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The increasing use of pesticides, driven by the global demand for food and energy, often results in environmental concentrations exceeding safety use levels due to indiscriminate use. This study evaluated the impact of cypermethrin, atrazine, glyphosate, and 2,4-D at different concentrations on the initial growth of Amazonian forest tree species. The recommended doses for application of these products or based on the label of these products were: 0.02 l ha<sup>−1</sup> of cypermethrin, 4.5 l ha<sup>−1</sup> of atrazine, 3 l ha<sup>−1</sup> of glyphosate, and 1.5 l ha<sup>−1</sup> of 2,4-D. Based on these values, the following concentrations were tested: 1/4, 1/2, recommended, 2 × , and 4 × the recommended dose, along with controls with water and adjuvant Assist Assist® EC. After 30 days, Final Mortality, Collar Diameter, Stem Length, Root Length, Shoot Dry Weight, Root Dry Weight, and Total Dry Weight were evaluated. Considering the species tested <i>H. petraeum</i> exhibited higher sensitivity to cypermethrin and glyphosate, with severe effects observed even at 1/4 of the recommended dose, particularly affecting dry mass. In contrast, <i>E. schomburgkii</i> showed greater sensitivity to atrazine and glyphosate, again with significant impacts on dry mass. Root dry mass emerged as an effective parameter for assessing pesticide toxicity in both species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01296-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The increasing use of pesticides, driven by the global demand for food and energy, often results in environmental concentrations exceeding safety use levels due to indiscriminate use. This study evaluated the impact of cypermethrin, atrazine, glyphosate, and 2,4-D at different concentrations on the initial growth of Amazonian forest tree species. The recommended doses for application of these products or based on the label of these products were: 0.02 l ha−1 of cypermethrin, 4.5 l ha−1 of atrazine, 3 l ha−1 of glyphosate, and 1.5 l ha−1 of 2,4-D. Based on these values, the following concentrations were tested: 1/4, 1/2, recommended, 2 × , and 4 × the recommended dose, along with controls with water and adjuvant Assist Assist® EC. After 30 days, Final Mortality, Collar Diameter, Stem Length, Root Length, Shoot Dry Weight, Root Dry Weight, and Total Dry Weight were evaluated. Considering the species tested H. petraeum exhibited higher sensitivity to cypermethrin and glyphosate, with severe effects observed even at 1/4 of the recommended dose, particularly affecting dry mass. In contrast, E. schomburgkii showed greater sensitivity to atrazine and glyphosate, again with significant impacts on dry mass. Root dry mass emerged as an effective parameter for assessing pesticide toxicity in both species.
期刊介绍:
Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base