An evaluation of therapeutic Life Story Work in residential out of home care

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
S.A. Kontomichalos-Eyre , M. Fuller-Tyszkiewicz , J. Browne , J.A. McGillivray
{"title":"An evaluation of therapeutic Life Story Work in residential out of home care","authors":"S.A. Kontomichalos-Eyre ,&nbsp;M. Fuller-Tyszkiewicz ,&nbsp;J. Browne ,&nbsp;J.A. McGillivray","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Research into therapeutic approaches for children in residential out-of-home-care (OOHC) is critical given the paucity of effective interventions in the literature. Health and social care settings claim Therapeutic Life Story Work (TLSW) has therapeutic benefits to individuals who have experience repeated trauma. This paper explores the effectiveness of TLSW with children in residential OOHC.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A total of 46 children (1.5 % of the Australian cohort) and their Keyworkers participated in this study, comprising an Intervention Group (n = 23) and Comparison Group (n = 23). Baseline measures of resilience, behavioural and emotional states were repeated at completion of the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A clear trend towards significance was evident (<em>p</em> = 0.055) in improved pro-social skills (SDQ) in the Intervention Group as observed by residential Keyworkers. This suggests an increase in children’s consideration of other’s feelings, sharing, supporting others in distress, kindness to younger children, and offering to help out. Moreover, clinical cut-off scores for emotional and behavioural issues found the Intervention Group were 5 % more likely to achieve a reduction in Emotional, Peer, and Conduct problems, as well as Hyperactivity, and 24 % more likely to increase Prosocial skills. They also appeared to tolerate the TLSW well, with no participant dropout.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest the constructs of TLSW enables children in residential OOHC, often described as treatment resistant, participate in this intervention. Given the need for greater collaboration between government, researchers and practitioners, in the development of efficacious interventions for this cohort, research learnings are provided for future evaluations into the effectiveness of this intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 108539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925004220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Research into therapeutic approaches for children in residential out-of-home-care (OOHC) is critical given the paucity of effective interventions in the literature. Health and social care settings claim Therapeutic Life Story Work (TLSW) has therapeutic benefits to individuals who have experience repeated trauma. This paper explores the effectiveness of TLSW with children in residential OOHC.

Method

A total of 46 children (1.5 % of the Australian cohort) and their Keyworkers participated in this study, comprising an Intervention Group (n = 23) and Comparison Group (n = 23). Baseline measures of resilience, behavioural and emotional states were repeated at completion of the intervention.

Results

A clear trend towards significance was evident (p = 0.055) in improved pro-social skills (SDQ) in the Intervention Group as observed by residential Keyworkers. This suggests an increase in children’s consideration of other’s feelings, sharing, supporting others in distress, kindness to younger children, and offering to help out. Moreover, clinical cut-off scores for emotional and behavioural issues found the Intervention Group were 5 % more likely to achieve a reduction in Emotional, Peer, and Conduct problems, as well as Hyperactivity, and 24 % more likely to increase Prosocial skills. They also appeared to tolerate the TLSW well, with no participant dropout.

Conclusion

These findings suggest the constructs of TLSW enables children in residential OOHC, often described as treatment resistant, participate in this intervention. Given the need for greater collaboration between government, researchers and practitioners, in the development of efficacious interventions for this cohort, research learnings are provided for future evaluations into the effectiveness of this intervention.
治疗性生活故事工作在住家外护理中的评估
目的考虑到文献中缺乏有效的干预措施,研究寄宿家庭外护理儿童的治疗方法至关重要。健康和社会护理机构声称,治疗性生活故事工作(TLSW)对经历反复创伤的个人有治疗益处。本文探讨了在住宅OOHC中,TLSW对儿童的有效性。方法共46名儿童(占澳大利亚队列的1.5%)及其关键工作者参与本研究,包括干预组(n = 23)和对照组(n = 23)。在干预结束时,重复恢复力、行为和情绪状态的基线测量。结果干预组在亲社会技能(SDQ)的改善上有明显的显著性趋势(p = 0.055)。这表明孩子们会更多地考虑他人的感受,分享,在痛苦中支持他人,对年幼的孩子友善,并主动提供帮助。此外,情绪和行为问题的临床分值发现,干预组在情绪、同伴和行为问题以及多动症方面减少的可能性要高5%,增加亲社会技能的可能性要高24%。他们似乎也能很好地忍受TLSW,没有参与者中途退出。结论:这些研究结果表明,TLSW的构建使住院OOHC的儿童(通常被描述为治疗抵抗)能够参与这种干预。鉴于政府、研究人员和从业人员之间需要加强合作,为这一群体开发有效的干预措施,为今后评估这种干预措施的有效性提供了研究成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信