{"title":"Development and evaluation of animated instructional materials and collaborative learning for nursing research courses: An action research study","authors":"Yu-Huan Chao , Hsiao-Ying Wu , Tsai-Hsiu Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nursing research courses can be challenging due to the complex terminology, causing some undergraduates to be overwhelmed and have low motivation to engage in the course content. Theory-based animated instructional materials can enhance students' interest and learning outcomes, potentially becoming an effective teaching strategy for nursing research courses.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To develop animated instructional materials based on the cognitive theory of multimedia learning and four-component instructional design model, integrate collaborative learning strategies, and evaluate students' cognitive load and learning experiences.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Action research approach.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>A university in central Taiwan.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Fifty-one undergraduate nursing students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six lessons comprising 17 animated instructional materials were developed. The course structure includes three phases: (1) preclass (students watch animated videos on the teaching platform), (2) in-class (students engage in collaborative learning groups [8–9 members] to discuss, complete tasks, and present, with teachers providing clarifications), and (3) postclass (students perform reflective writing and participate in learning assessments, including cognitive load and satisfaction surveys).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Students reported a moderate level of intrinsic cognitive load (M = 1.94; standard deviations [SD] = 0.92; range 1.71–2.45) and a low level of extraneous cognitive load (M = 1.49; SD = 0.71; range 1.47–1.53) based on a five-point scale, indicating that the materials imposed minimal extraneous load. Meanwhile, overall satisfaction was high (M = 4.39; SD = 0.62; range 4.33–4.43) based on a five-point scale, with improvement in learning skills and critical thinking/problem-solving abilities rated the highest. The qualitative reflections revealed five themes: (1) engaging and stress-reducing learning experience, (2) simplifying concepts to improve memory, (3) complex concept interpretation advantage, (4) convenience for preview and review, and (5) collaborative learning benefits and challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Theory-based animated instructional materials can enhance students' learning satisfaction and comprehension without additional cognitive load. Collaborative learning was beneficial. However, effective implementation requires careful monitoring of group dynamics and timely conflict resolution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 106854"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725002916","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Nursing research courses can be challenging due to the complex terminology, causing some undergraduates to be overwhelmed and have low motivation to engage in the course content. Theory-based animated instructional materials can enhance students' interest and learning outcomes, potentially becoming an effective teaching strategy for nursing research courses.
Aims
To develop animated instructional materials based on the cognitive theory of multimedia learning and four-component instructional design model, integrate collaborative learning strategies, and evaluate students' cognitive load and learning experiences.
Design
Action research approach.
Setting
A university in central Taiwan.
Participants
Fifty-one undergraduate nursing students.
Methods
Six lessons comprising 17 animated instructional materials were developed. The course structure includes three phases: (1) preclass (students watch animated videos on the teaching platform), (2) in-class (students engage in collaborative learning groups [8–9 members] to discuss, complete tasks, and present, with teachers providing clarifications), and (3) postclass (students perform reflective writing and participate in learning assessments, including cognitive load and satisfaction surveys).
Results
Students reported a moderate level of intrinsic cognitive load (M = 1.94; standard deviations [SD] = 0.92; range 1.71–2.45) and a low level of extraneous cognitive load (M = 1.49; SD = 0.71; range 1.47–1.53) based on a five-point scale, indicating that the materials imposed minimal extraneous load. Meanwhile, overall satisfaction was high (M = 4.39; SD = 0.62; range 4.33–4.43) based on a five-point scale, with improvement in learning skills and critical thinking/problem-solving abilities rated the highest. The qualitative reflections revealed five themes: (1) engaging and stress-reducing learning experience, (2) simplifying concepts to improve memory, (3) complex concept interpretation advantage, (4) convenience for preview and review, and (5) collaborative learning benefits and challenges.
Conclusions
Theory-based animated instructional materials can enhance students' learning satisfaction and comprehension without additional cognitive load. Collaborative learning was beneficial. However, effective implementation requires careful monitoring of group dynamics and timely conflict resolution.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education.
The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives.
Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.