Thanking the World: Exploring gender-based differences in acknowledgment patterns and support systems in theses

IF 8.3
Data and information management Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.dim.2024.100092
Manika Lamba , Hendrik Erz
{"title":"Thanking the World: Exploring gender-based differences in acknowledgment patterns and support systems in theses","authors":"Manika Lamba ,&nbsp;Hendrik Erz","doi":"10.1016/j.dim.2024.100092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on acknowledgment sections of scientific papers has gained significant attention, but there remains a dearth of studies examining acknowledgments in the context of Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). This paper addresses this gap by investigating the sources of support for male and female researchers in completing their master's or doctoral theses, focusing on the discipline of Library and Information Science (LIS). We utilize a novel method of extracting the various types of support systems that are acknowledged in 1252 ETDs using BERT models. The most prominent forms of support acknowledged by researchers are academic, moral, financial, and religious support. While there were no significant gender-based differences in religious and financial support, the ratio of academic to moral support acknowledged by researchers showed strong gender-based variation. Additionally, advisors displayed a preference for supervising same-gender researchers. By comprehending the nuances of support systems and the unique challenges faced by researchers of different genders, we can foster a more inclusive and supportive academic environment. The insights gained from this research have implications for improving mentoring practices and promoting gender equality in academia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72769,"journal":{"name":"Data and information management","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data and information management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925124000287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on acknowledgment sections of scientific papers has gained significant attention, but there remains a dearth of studies examining acknowledgments in the context of Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). This paper addresses this gap by investigating the sources of support for male and female researchers in completing their master's or doctoral theses, focusing on the discipline of Library and Information Science (LIS). We utilize a novel method of extracting the various types of support systems that are acknowledged in 1252 ETDs using BERT models. The most prominent forms of support acknowledged by researchers are academic, moral, financial, and religious support. While there were no significant gender-based differences in religious and financial support, the ratio of academic to moral support acknowledged by researchers showed strong gender-based variation. Additionally, advisors displayed a preference for supervising same-gender researchers. By comprehending the nuances of support systems and the unique challenges faced by researchers of different genders, we can foster a more inclusive and supportive academic environment. The insights gained from this research have implications for improving mentoring practices and promoting gender equality in academia.
感谢世界:探讨论文中承认模式和支持系统的性别差异
对科技论文致谢部分的研究已经引起了人们的极大关注,但在电子论文致谢的背景下,研究致谢的研究仍然缺乏。本文通过调查男性和女性研究人员完成硕士或博士论文的支持来源来解决这一差距,重点是图书馆与信息科学(LIS)学科。我们利用BERT模型提取1252个etd中确认的各种类型的支持系统的新方法。研究人员承认的最主要的支持形式是学术、道德、经济和宗教支持。虽然在宗教和经济支持方面没有明显的性别差异,但研究人员承认,学术支持与道德支持的比例显示出强烈的性别差异。此外,顾问们更倾向于指导同性研究人员。通过理解支持系统的细微差别和不同性别研究人员面临的独特挑战,我们可以营造一个更具包容性和支持性的学术环境。从本研究中获得的见解对改善指导实践和促进学术界的性别平等具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Data and information management
Data and information management Management Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书