Doubly robust criterion for causal inference

IF 1 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Takamichi Baba, Yoshiyuki Ninomiya
{"title":"Doubly robust criterion for causal inference","authors":"Takamichi Baba,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Ninomiya","doi":"10.1002/cjs.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In causal inference, semiparametric estimation using propensity scores has rapidly developed in various directions. At the same time, although model selection is indispensable in statistical analysis, an information criterion for selecting the regression structure between the potential outcome and explanatory variables has not been well developed. Here, based on the original definition of AIC, we derive an AIC-type criterion for propensity score analysis. A risk based on the Kullback–Leibler divergence is defined as the cornerstone, and general causal inference models and general causal effects are treated. Considering the high importance of doubly robust estimation, we make the information criterion itself doubly robust so that it is an asymptotically unbiased estimator of the risk even under some model misspecification. In simulation studies, we compare the derived criterion with an existing weighted quasi-likelihood information criterion and confirm that the former outperforms the latter. Real data analyses indicate that results using the two criteria can differ significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":55281,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Statistics-Revue Canadienne De Statistique","volume":"53 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjs.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Statistics-Revue Canadienne De Statistique","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjs.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In causal inference, semiparametric estimation using propensity scores has rapidly developed in various directions. At the same time, although model selection is indispensable in statistical analysis, an information criterion for selecting the regression structure between the potential outcome and explanatory variables has not been well developed. Here, based on the original definition of AIC, we derive an AIC-type criterion for propensity score analysis. A risk based on the Kullback–Leibler divergence is defined as the cornerstone, and general causal inference models and general causal effects are treated. Considering the high importance of doubly robust estimation, we make the information criterion itself doubly robust so that it is an asymptotically unbiased estimator of the risk even under some model misspecification. In simulation studies, we compare the derived criterion with an existing weighted quasi-likelihood information criterion and confirm that the former outperforms the latter. Real data analyses indicate that results using the two criteria can differ significantly.

因果推理的双鲁棒准则
在因果推理中,利用倾向分数进行半参数估计已迅速向各个方向发展。与此同时,虽然模型选择在统计分析中是必不可少的,但选择潜在结果与解释变量之间回归结构的信息标准尚未得到很好的发展。在此,基于AIC的原始定义,我们导出了一个AIC类型的倾向得分分析标准。将基于Kullback-Leibler散度的风险定义为基础,并对一般因果推理模型和一般因果效应进行了处理。考虑到双鲁棒估计的重要性,我们使信息准则本身具有双鲁棒性,使得即使在某些模型不规范的情况下,它也是风险的渐近无偏估计量。在仿真研究中,我们将导出的准则与现有的加权准似然信息准则进行了比较,并证实前者优于后者。实际数据分析表明,使用这两种标准的结果可能存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Statistics is the official journal of the Statistical Society of Canada. It has a reputation internationally as an excellent journal. The editorial board is comprised of statistical scientists with applied, computational, methodological, theoretical and probabilistic interests. Their role is to ensure that the journal continues to provide an international forum for the discipline of Statistics. The journal seeks papers making broad points of interest to many readers, whereas papers making important points of more specific interest are better placed in more specialized journals. The levels of innovation and impact are key in the evaluation of submitted manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信