Survival After Fertility-Preserving Hormonal Therapy vs Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer

IF 20.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Yukio Suzuki, Yongmei Huang, Xiao Xu, Jennifer S. Ferris, Elena B. Elkin, Chung Yin Kong, Evan R. Myers, Haruya Saji, Etsuko Miyagi, Laura J. Havrilesky, Stephanie V. Blank, Dawn L. Hershman, Jason D. Wright
{"title":"Survival After Fertility-Preserving Hormonal Therapy vs Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer","authors":"Yukio Suzuki, Yongmei Huang, Xiao Xu, Jennifer S. Ferris, Elena B. Elkin, Chung Yin Kong, Evan R. Myers, Haruya Saji, Etsuko Miyagi, Laura J. Havrilesky, Stephanie V. Blank, Dawn L. Hershman, Jason D. Wright","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.2761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceAs the number of young women with early-stage endometrial cancer is increasing, there is growing interest in use of progesterone-based therapy to allow fertility preservation.ObjectiveTo ascertain the long-term survival of premenopausal women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer treated primarily with fertility-preserving hormonal therapy compared with hysterectomy.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database to identify female patients aged 18 to 49 years with clinical stage I, grade 1 to 2, endometrioid endometrial cancer diagnosed from 2004 through 2020. In addition, trends in and factors associated with the use of fertility-preserving hormonal therapy were examined. Propensity score matching was used to compare survival among patients treated primarily with fertility-preserving hormonal therapy and those treated with hysterectomy. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to January 2024.ExposuresPrimary treatment was defined as hysterectomy or fertility-preserving hormonal therapy based on days from diagnosis to operation or fertility-preserving hormonal therapy.Main Outcomes and MeasuresTime to all-cause mortality was measured in months from cancer diagnosis to death or last follow-up at 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year intervals.ResultsA total of 15 849 women, including 14 662 (92.5%) treated with primary hysterectomy (mean [IQR] age, 44 [39-47] years]) and 1187 (7.5%) who received primary hormonal therapy (mean [IQR] age, 34 [30-38] years) were identified. The use of hormonal treatment increased from 5.2% in 2004 to 13.8% in 2020 (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001). After propensity score matching, 5-year survival was 98.5% (95% CI, 97.3%-99.2%) for primary hysterectomy and 96.8% (95% CI, 95.3%-97.8%) for primary hormonal therapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.84; 95% CI, 1.06-3.21). Among patients younger than 40 years, there was no difference in survival between hysterectomy and hormonal therapy (HR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.50-2.00). However, for patients aged 40 to 49 years, fertility-preserving hormonal therapy was associated with a significantly increased risk of death (HR = 4.94; 95% CI, 1.89-12.91).Conclusions and RelevanceThis study found that the use of fertility-preserving hormonal therapy among reproductive age patients with early-stage endometrial cancer has increased over time. While overall survival in patients with hormonal therapy is shorter than with hysterectomy, survival for patients younger than 40 years of age is comparable after primary treatment with fertility-preserving hormonal therapy or hysterectomy.","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.2761","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceAs the number of young women with early-stage endometrial cancer is increasing, there is growing interest in use of progesterone-based therapy to allow fertility preservation.ObjectiveTo ascertain the long-term survival of premenopausal women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer treated primarily with fertility-preserving hormonal therapy compared with hysterectomy.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database to identify female patients aged 18 to 49 years with clinical stage I, grade 1 to 2, endometrioid endometrial cancer diagnosed from 2004 through 2020. In addition, trends in and factors associated with the use of fertility-preserving hormonal therapy were examined. Propensity score matching was used to compare survival among patients treated primarily with fertility-preserving hormonal therapy and those treated with hysterectomy. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to January 2024.ExposuresPrimary treatment was defined as hysterectomy or fertility-preserving hormonal therapy based on days from diagnosis to operation or fertility-preserving hormonal therapy.Main Outcomes and MeasuresTime to all-cause mortality was measured in months from cancer diagnosis to death or last follow-up at 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year intervals.ResultsA total of 15 849 women, including 14 662 (92.5%) treated with primary hysterectomy (mean [IQR] age, 44 [39-47] years]) and 1187 (7.5%) who received primary hormonal therapy (mean [IQR] age, 34 [30-38] years) were identified. The use of hormonal treatment increased from 5.2% in 2004 to 13.8% in 2020 (P &amp;lt; .001). After propensity score matching, 5-year survival was 98.5% (95% CI, 97.3%-99.2%) for primary hysterectomy and 96.8% (95% CI, 95.3%-97.8%) for primary hormonal therapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.84; 95% CI, 1.06-3.21). Among patients younger than 40 years, there was no difference in survival between hysterectomy and hormonal therapy (HR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.50-2.00). However, for patients aged 40 to 49 years, fertility-preserving hormonal therapy was associated with a significantly increased risk of death (HR = 4.94; 95% CI, 1.89-12.91).Conclusions and RelevanceThis study found that the use of fertility-preserving hormonal therapy among reproductive age patients with early-stage endometrial cancer has increased over time. While overall survival in patients with hormonal therapy is shorter than with hysterectomy, survival for patients younger than 40 years of age is comparable after primary treatment with fertility-preserving hormonal therapy or hysterectomy.
保留生育能力的激素治疗与早期子宫内膜癌子宫切除术后的生存率
随着患有早期子宫内膜癌的年轻女性数量的增加,人们对使用基于黄体酮的治疗来保持生育能力的兴趣越来越大。目的探讨以保生育激素治疗为主的绝经前I期子宫内膜癌患者与子宫切除术患者的远期生存率。设计、环境和参与者本队列研究使用来自国家癌症数据库的数据,确定2004年至2020年诊断为临床I期、1至2级子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌的18至49岁女性患者。此外,趋势和有关因素的使用保留生育能力的激素治疗进行了检查。倾向评分匹配用于比较主要接受保留生育能力激素治疗的患者和接受子宫切除术治疗的患者的生存率。数据分析时间为2023年11月至2024年1月。初步治疗定义为子宫切除术或保留生育能力的激素治疗,基于从诊断到手术或保留生育能力的激素治疗的天数。主要结局和测量方法从癌症诊断到死亡或最后一次随访,以2年、5年和10年为间隔,以月为单位测量至全因死亡率的时间。结果共纳入15 849例女性,其中14 662例(92.5%)行原发性子宫切除术(平均[IQR]年龄44[39 ~ 47]岁),1187例(7.5%)行原发性激素治疗(平均[IQR]年龄34[30 ~ 38]岁)。激素治疗的使用从2004年的5.2%增加到2020年的13.8% (P &lt; 001)。倾向评分匹配后,原发性子宫切除术的5年生存率为98.5% (95% CI, 97.3%-99.2%),原发性激素治疗的5年生存率为96.8% (95% CI, 95.3%-97.8%)(风险比[HR] = 1.84; 95% CI, 1.06-3.21)。在年龄小于40岁的患者中,子宫切除术与激素治疗的生存率无差异(HR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.50-2.00)。然而,对于40 - 49岁的患者,保留生育能力的激素治疗与死亡风险显著增加相关(HR = 4.94; 95% CI, 1.89-12.91)。结论和相关性本研究发现,在育龄早期子宫内膜癌患者中,保留生育能力的激素治疗的使用随着时间的推移而增加。虽然激素治疗患者的总生存期短于子宫切除术,但40岁以下患者的生存期与保留生育能力的激素治疗或子宫切除术的初步治疗相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Oncology
JAMA Oncology Medicine-Oncology
自引率
1.80%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: JAMA Oncology is an international peer-reviewed journal that serves as the leading publication for scientists, clinicians, and trainees working in the field of oncology. It is part of the JAMA Network, a collection of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信