Feral Horses and Their Environmental Impacts in the Australian Alps: Policy and Management Priorities

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Austral Ecology Pub Date : 2025-08-29 DOI:10.1111/aec.70117
Ayesha Tulloch, Euan Ritchie, Don Driscoll
{"title":"Feral Horses and Their Environmental Impacts in the Australian Alps: Policy and Management Priorities","authors":"Ayesha Tulloch,&nbsp;Euan Ritchie,&nbsp;Don Driscoll","doi":"10.1111/aec.70117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Feral horses (<i>Equus caballus</i>) are listed as a Key Threatening Process (KTP) under federal and state conservation policies, leading to active state government management programs aimed at reducing feral horse populations in ecologically sensitive regions (Tables 1 and 2). Program and expert reporting shows benefits for water, vegetation, soil, waterbirds and native fish from horse removal in these systems (Rowland, Moore, and Walsh <span>2023</span>; Just et al. <span>2025</span>). The NSW Government's Kosciuszko Wild Horse Heritage Act 2018 diverges from the policies of other States, and conflicts with the NSW KTP listing, by mandating retention of 3000 horses in one third of Kosciuszko National Park. This is despite extensive scientific evidence of the environmental harm caused by feral horses in Kosciuszko National Park, across other alpine, subalpine and riverine regions (Figure 1), and in other ecosystems (Nimmo and Miller <span>2007</span>; Driscoll et al. <span>2019</span>; Stobo-Wilson et al. <span>2020</span>).</p><p>Complete removal via culling of feral horses from threatened alpine and subalpine ecosystems, including peatlands and wetlands, is recommended (Beeton and Johnson <span>2019</span>). Excluding horses from sensitive locations (e.g., through fencing), or using fertility control methods, is insufficient for preserving ecological function and connectivity of sensitive ecosystems such as alpine peatlands and wetlands (Driscoll et al. <span>2019</span>; Hobbs and Hinds <span>2018</span>).</p><p>Horse control must be coordinated with integrated fire and pest management strategies addressing other invasive herbivores and omnivores, weeds and invasive predators (Keith et al. <span>2022</span>; Rowland, Walsh, et al. <span>2023</span>). Restoration, including moss layer transfers and hydrological repair in peatlands, may reverse some damage and recover lost carbon storage capacity once horses are removed (Treby and Grover <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Uncensored evidence-based communication of feral horse impacts by State agency staff, independent scientists and political leaders is essential to make the cost of inaction clear (Nimmo and Miller <span>2007</span>). The evidence is unequivocal: feral horses present a significant ecological threat to Australia's alpine and subalpine environments. Legislation that supports effective feral horse control throughout national parks and other public land designated for conservation purposes must be in place.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"50 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70117","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feral horses (Equus caballus) are listed as a Key Threatening Process (KTP) under federal and state conservation policies, leading to active state government management programs aimed at reducing feral horse populations in ecologically sensitive regions (Tables 1 and 2). Program and expert reporting shows benefits for water, vegetation, soil, waterbirds and native fish from horse removal in these systems (Rowland, Moore, and Walsh 2023; Just et al. 2025). The NSW Government's Kosciuszko Wild Horse Heritage Act 2018 diverges from the policies of other States, and conflicts with the NSW KTP listing, by mandating retention of 3000 horses in one third of Kosciuszko National Park. This is despite extensive scientific evidence of the environmental harm caused by feral horses in Kosciuszko National Park, across other alpine, subalpine and riverine regions (Figure 1), and in other ecosystems (Nimmo and Miller 2007; Driscoll et al. 2019; Stobo-Wilson et al. 2020).

Complete removal via culling of feral horses from threatened alpine and subalpine ecosystems, including peatlands and wetlands, is recommended (Beeton and Johnson 2019). Excluding horses from sensitive locations (e.g., through fencing), or using fertility control methods, is insufficient for preserving ecological function and connectivity of sensitive ecosystems such as alpine peatlands and wetlands (Driscoll et al. 2019; Hobbs and Hinds 2018).

Horse control must be coordinated with integrated fire and pest management strategies addressing other invasive herbivores and omnivores, weeds and invasive predators (Keith et al. 2022; Rowland, Walsh, et al. 2023). Restoration, including moss layer transfers and hydrological repair in peatlands, may reverse some damage and recover lost carbon storage capacity once horses are removed (Treby and Grover 2023).

Uncensored evidence-based communication of feral horse impacts by State agency staff, independent scientists and political leaders is essential to make the cost of inaction clear (Nimmo and Miller 2007). The evidence is unequivocal: feral horses present a significant ecological threat to Australia's alpine and subalpine environments. Legislation that supports effective feral horse control throughout national parks and other public land designated for conservation purposes must be in place.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abstract Image

澳大利亚阿尔卑斯山的野马及其对环境的影响:政策和管理重点
根据联邦和州的保护政策,野马(Equus caballus)被列为关键威胁过程(KTP),导致州政府积极的管理计划,旨在减少生态敏感地区的野马种群(表1和2)。项目和专家报告显示,在这些系统中去除马对水、植被、土壤、水鸟和本地鱼类都有好处(Rowland, Moore, and Walsh, 2023; Just et al. 2025)。新南威尔士州政府的《2018年科肖什科野马遗产法案》(Kosciuszko Wild Horse Heritage Act 2018)要求保留科肖什科国家公园三分之一的3000匹马,这与其他州的政策不同,也与新南威尔士州KTP名录相冲突。尽管有大量科学证据表明,在科希丘什科国家公园、其他高山、亚高山和河流地区(图1)以及其他生态系统中,野马对环境造成了危害(Nimmo和Miller 2007; Driscoll等人2019;Stobo-Wilson等人2020)。建议通过从受威胁的高山和亚高山生态系统(包括泥炭地和湿地)中剔除野马来彻底清除(Beeton和Johnson, 2019)。将马排除在敏感地点(例如,通过围栏)或使用生育控制方法,不足以保护高山泥炭地和湿地等敏感生态系统的生态功能和连通性(Driscoll et al. 2019; Hobbs and Hinds 2018)。马的控制必须与针对其他入侵食草动物和杂食动物、杂草和入侵捕食者的综合火灾和害虫管理策略相协调(Keith等人,2022;Rowland, Walsh等人,2023)。一旦马被移走,泥炭地的恢复,包括苔藓层转移和水文修复,可能会逆转一些损害并恢复失去的碳储存能力(Treby和Grover 2023)。国家机构工作人员、独立科学家和政治领导人就野马的影响进行未经审查的基于证据的交流,对于明确不作为的代价至关重要(Nimmo和Miller 2007)。证据是明确的:野马对澳大利亚的高山和亚高山环境构成了重大的生态威胁。必须立法支持在整个国家公园和其他指定用于保护目的的公共土地上有效地控制野马。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Austral Ecology
Austral Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere. Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region. Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信