The Moderating Role of Race/Ethnicity in Suicide Risk and Family Connectedness in Youth Presenting to the Emergency Department

Ritika Merai BA , Tesia Shi BS , August X. Wei BS , Donna A. Ruch PhD , Jeffrey A. Bridge PhD , Maryland Pao MD , Lisa M. Horowitz PhD, MPH
{"title":"The Moderating Role of Race/Ethnicity in Suicide Risk and Family Connectedness in Youth Presenting to the Emergency Department","authors":"Ritika Merai BA ,&nbsp;Tesia Shi BS ,&nbsp;August X. Wei BS ,&nbsp;Donna A. Ruch PhD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Bridge PhD ,&nbsp;Maryland Pao MD ,&nbsp;Lisa M. Horowitz PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Significant racial disparities exist in youth suicide rates. Research has identified family connectedness as a strong protective factor against suicide. However, the role of family in youth mental health can vary based on cultural factors that may differ across race and/or ethnicity. This study aimed to evaluate how race/ethnicity moderates the association between suicide risk and family connectedness.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This secondary analysis of Emergency Department Screen for Teens at Risk for Suicide (ED-STARS) study 1 included youth ages 12 to 17 years. Data were obtained for race/ethnicity, family connectedness (combined score of 2 items, range 2 [low] to 10 [high]), and the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) tool. Binary logistic regression assessed the association between family connectedness and positive ASQ screen, with race/ethnicity as a moderator.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data for 5,514 participants (50.9% female, 45.8% non-Hispanic White, mean [SD] age = 15.0 [1.7] years) were analyzed. Of all participants, 23.5% (1,293/5,514) screened positive for suicide risk. Overall, participants reported high family connectedness (mean [SD] = 8.2 [1.74]). Multiracial participants had the lowest average family connectedness (7.93) and the highest screen positive rate (28.34% [70/247]). For a 1-unit increase in family connectedness, the odds of screening positive were significantly lower for Black/African American participants (odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.49-0.59) compared to White participants (odds ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.43-0.49) (difference: <em>z</em> = −3.17, <em>p</em> = .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The protective effect of family connectedness for suicide risk may vary by race/ethnicity. In this study, family connectedness was less protective against suicide risk for Black/African American youth compared to White youth. Findings highlight the importance of cultural considerations in family-based interventions for suicide prevention.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>There are significant racial disparities in youth suicide rates, with family connectedness as one of the strongest protective factors against suicide. This study evaluated how race/ethnicity moderates the relation between suicide risk and family connectedness using data from the Emergency Department Screen for Teens at Risk for Suicide (ED-STARS) study which included youth aged 12-17 years. Family connectedness may be less protective against suicide risk for Black/African American youth compared to White youth. In addition, multiracial youth were at higher risk with the lowest average family connectedness and the highest screen positive rate for suicide risk. These results highlight the importance of cultural considerations in family-based interventions for suicide prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73525,"journal":{"name":"JAACAP open","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 448-454"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAACAP open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732925000158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Significant racial disparities exist in youth suicide rates. Research has identified family connectedness as a strong protective factor against suicide. However, the role of family in youth mental health can vary based on cultural factors that may differ across race and/or ethnicity. This study aimed to evaluate how race/ethnicity moderates the association between suicide risk and family connectedness.

Method

This secondary analysis of Emergency Department Screen for Teens at Risk for Suicide (ED-STARS) study 1 included youth ages 12 to 17 years. Data were obtained for race/ethnicity, family connectedness (combined score of 2 items, range 2 [low] to 10 [high]), and the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) tool. Binary logistic regression assessed the association between family connectedness and positive ASQ screen, with race/ethnicity as a moderator.

Results

Data for 5,514 participants (50.9% female, 45.8% non-Hispanic White, mean [SD] age = 15.0 [1.7] years) were analyzed. Of all participants, 23.5% (1,293/5,514) screened positive for suicide risk. Overall, participants reported high family connectedness (mean [SD] = 8.2 [1.74]). Multiracial participants had the lowest average family connectedness (7.93) and the highest screen positive rate (28.34% [70/247]). For a 1-unit increase in family connectedness, the odds of screening positive were significantly lower for Black/African American participants (odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.49-0.59) compared to White participants (odds ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.43-0.49) (difference: z = −3.17, p = .001).

Conclusion

The protective effect of family connectedness for suicide risk may vary by race/ethnicity. In this study, family connectedness was less protective against suicide risk for Black/African American youth compared to White youth. Findings highlight the importance of cultural considerations in family-based interventions for suicide prevention.

Plain language summary

There are significant racial disparities in youth suicide rates, with family connectedness as one of the strongest protective factors against suicide. This study evaluated how race/ethnicity moderates the relation between suicide risk and family connectedness using data from the Emergency Department Screen for Teens at Risk for Suicide (ED-STARS) study which included youth aged 12-17 years. Family connectedness may be less protective against suicide risk for Black/African American youth compared to White youth. In addition, multiracial youth were at higher risk with the lowest average family connectedness and the highest screen positive rate for suicide risk. These results highlight the importance of cultural considerations in family-based interventions for suicide prevention.
种族/民族在急诊科青少年自杀风险和家庭联系中的调节作用
目的青少年自杀率存在显著的种族差异。研究发现,家庭联系是防止自杀的有力保护因素。然而,家庭在青少年心理健康中的作用可能因文化因素而异,这些文化因素可能因种族和/或族裔而异。本研究旨在评估种族/民族如何调节自杀风险与家庭联系之间的关联。方法对急诊科青少年自杀风险筛查(ED-STARS)研究1的二次分析纳入了12至17岁的青少年。获得了种族/民族、家庭连通性(2项综合得分,范围2[低]到10[高])和询问自杀筛查问题(ASQ)工具的数据。二元逻辑回归评估家庭连通性与阳性ASQ筛查之间的关系,种族/民族是调节因素。结果共分析了5514名参与者的数据(50.9%为女性,45.8%为非西班牙裔白人,平均[SD]年龄= 15.0[1.7]岁)。在所有参与者中,23.5%(1293 / 5514)的自杀风险筛查呈阳性。总体而言,参与者报告的家庭连通性较高(平均值[SD] = 8.2[1.74])。多种族参与者的平均家庭连通性最低(7.93),筛查阳性率最高(28.34%)[70/247]。对于家庭联系增加1个单位,黑人/非裔美国人参与者的筛查阳性几率显著低于白人参与者(优势比0.54,95% CI 0.49-0.59)(优势比0.46,95% CI 0.43-0.49)(差异:z = - 3.17, p = .001)。结论家庭连通性对自杀风险的保护作用可能因种族而异。在这项研究中,与白人青年相比,家庭联系对黑人/非裔美国青年自杀风险的保护作用较弱。研究结果强调了文化因素在以家庭为基础的自杀预防干预中的重要性。青少年自杀率存在明显的种族差异,家庭联系是防止自杀的最强保护因素之一。本研究评估了种族/民族如何调节自杀风险与家庭联系之间的关系,使用的数据来自急诊科自杀风险青少年筛查(ED-STARS)研究,该研究包括12-17岁的青少年。与白人青年相比,家庭联系对黑人/非裔美国青年防止自杀风险的保护作用可能更弱。此外,多种族青少年的自杀风险更高,平均家庭联系最低,自杀风险筛查阳性率最高。这些结果强调了文化因素在以家庭为基础的自杀预防干预中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAACAP open
JAACAP open Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信