Assessing Dimensions of Aggressive Behavior in Diverse Youth: The Peer Conflict Scale in English and Spanish

Denise López Sosa BA , Kate Simmons BS , Ashley R. Karlovich MS , Natalie Mastalerz BA , Spencer C. Evans PhD
{"title":"Assessing Dimensions of Aggressive Behavior in Diverse Youth: The Peer Conflict Scale in English and Spanish","authors":"Denise López Sosa BA ,&nbsp;Kate Simmons BS ,&nbsp;Ashley R. Karlovich MS ,&nbsp;Natalie Mastalerz BA ,&nbsp;Spencer C. Evans PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Researchers have differentiated forms (overt, relational) and functions (proactive, reactive) of aggressive behavior; however, the assessment options for measuring these constructs in youth remain limited. This study examined the parent-report Peer Conflict Scale (PCS) for measuring forms and functions of youth aggressive behavior in English and Spanish, including short- and long-form versions.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Participants were caregivers of 653 youths (ages 6-17; 57% male; 48% Hispanic) throughout North America. The PCS and other measures of emotional, behavioral, and social functioning were collected by parent-report in English (51%) and Spanish (49%). Analyses examined the descriptive characteristics, internal consistency, validity correlations, factor structure, and measurement invariance of the PCS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All PCS scales showed good or excellent internal consistency (αs/ωs = .82-.97). Convergent and discriminant validity hypotheses were generally supported, but with limited specificity to aggression dimensions. The independent forms-by-functions model (4 factors) fit best, although support was also found for general aggression, forms or functions, and paired form-by-function models (1-4 factors; root mean square error of approximation &lt;0.07, comparative fit index and Tucker-Lewis index &gt;0.96). The PCS demonstrated invariance and acceptable fit across language, gender, and age groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings support the reliability, validity, and utility of the PCS for assessing youth aggressive behavior as rated by English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers, whether via full-length (40-item) or brief (20-item) versions. Given that parent-rated PCS dimensions are highly correlated yet distinct, clinicians and researchers could use it to measure and model the aspects of aggressive behavior most relevant to their goals: general aggression, forms, functions, or forms and functions.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>Children and adolescents who engage in aggressive behavior face challenges at home, in school, and in their day-to-day activities. Few instruments can measure both the forms and the functions of aggression in youth, and even fewer have been validated among Spanish-speaking caregivers. Using a large online survey, this study examined a parent-report questionnaire, the Peer Conflict Scale (PCS), in terms of how well it measures the forms and functions of aggressive behavior among diverse youth. Results support the reliability and validity of the PCS, in full-length and short versions, and in English and Spanish.</div></div><div><h3>Diversity &amp; Inclusion Statement</h3><div>We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our reference list. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73525,"journal":{"name":"JAACAP open","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 768-781"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAACAP open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732925000055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Researchers have differentiated forms (overt, relational) and functions (proactive, reactive) of aggressive behavior; however, the assessment options for measuring these constructs in youth remain limited. This study examined the parent-report Peer Conflict Scale (PCS) for measuring forms and functions of youth aggressive behavior in English and Spanish, including short- and long-form versions.

Method

Participants were caregivers of 653 youths (ages 6-17; 57% male; 48% Hispanic) throughout North America. The PCS and other measures of emotional, behavioral, and social functioning were collected by parent-report in English (51%) and Spanish (49%). Analyses examined the descriptive characteristics, internal consistency, validity correlations, factor structure, and measurement invariance of the PCS.

Results

All PCS scales showed good or excellent internal consistency (αs/ωs = .82-.97). Convergent and discriminant validity hypotheses were generally supported, but with limited specificity to aggression dimensions. The independent forms-by-functions model (4 factors) fit best, although support was also found for general aggression, forms or functions, and paired form-by-function models (1-4 factors; root mean square error of approximation <0.07, comparative fit index and Tucker-Lewis index >0.96). The PCS demonstrated invariance and acceptable fit across language, gender, and age groups.

Conclusion

Findings support the reliability, validity, and utility of the PCS for assessing youth aggressive behavior as rated by English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers, whether via full-length (40-item) or brief (20-item) versions. Given that parent-rated PCS dimensions are highly correlated yet distinct, clinicians and researchers could use it to measure and model the aspects of aggressive behavior most relevant to their goals: general aggression, forms, functions, or forms and functions.

Plain language summary

Children and adolescents who engage in aggressive behavior face challenges at home, in school, and in their day-to-day activities. Few instruments can measure both the forms and the functions of aggression in youth, and even fewer have been validated among Spanish-speaking caregivers. Using a large online survey, this study examined a parent-report questionnaire, the Peer Conflict Scale (PCS), in terms of how well it measures the forms and functions of aggressive behavior among diverse youth. Results support the reliability and validity of the PCS, in full-length and short versions, and in English and Spanish.

Diversity & Inclusion Statement

We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our reference list. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list.
不同青少年攻击行为的评估维度:同伴冲突量表英文与西班牙文
目的对攻击行为的表现形式(显性的、关系的)和功能(主动的、被动的)进行了区分;然而,在青少年中测量这些构念的评估选择仍然有限。本研究考察了父母报告同伴冲突量表(PCS)用于测量青少年攻击行为的形式和功能的英语和西班牙语版本,包括短版本和长版本。方法参与者是北美653名青少年(6-17岁,57%为男性,48%为西班牙裔)的看护人。PCS和其他情感、行为和社会功能的测量由英语(51%)和西班牙语(49%)的家长报告收集。分析了PCS的描述特征、内部一致性、效度相关性、因子结构和测量不变性。结果各PCS量表具有良好或优异的内部一致性(αs/ωs = 0.82 ~ 0.97)。收敛效度假设和判别效度假设普遍得到支持,但对攻击维度的特异性有限。独立形式-函数模型(4个因子)拟合最佳,但一般攻击性、形式-函数和配对形式-函数模型(1-4个因子;近似均方根误差<;0.07,比较拟合指数和塔克-刘易斯指数>;0.96)也得到支持。PCS在语言、性别和年龄组中表现出了不变性和可接受的适应性。结论研究结果支持了英语和西班牙语照顾者评估青少年攻击行为的信度、效度和实用性,无论是通过完整的(40项)版本还是简短的(20项)版本。考虑到父母评定的PCS维度高度相关但又不同,临床医生和研究人员可以用它来测量和建模攻击行为最相关的方面:一般攻击,形式,功能,或形式和功能。有攻击性行为的儿童和青少年在家庭、学校和日常活动中都面临挑战。很少有工具可以同时测量青少年攻击行为的形式和功能,在说西班牙语的照顾者中得到验证的工具就更少了。通过一项大型在线调查,本研究检验了一份家长报告问卷——同伴冲突量表(PCS),以衡量不同青少年攻击行为的形式和功能。结果支持了PCS的信度和效度,包括全文和短文版本,以及英语和西班牙语版本。多样性和包容性声明我们努力确保在招募人类参与者时种族、民族和/或其他类型的多样性。我们努力确保招募人类参与者时的性别和性别平衡。我们努力确保研究问卷的编制具有包容性。本文的一位或多位作者自认为是科学中一个或多个历史上未被充分代表的种族和/或族裔群体的成员。我们积极努力促进在我们的作者群体中纳入历史上代表性不足的种族和/或民族群体。本文的一位或多位作者自认为是科学界一个或多个历史上未被充分代表的性和/或性别群体的成员。在引用与本工作科学相关的参考文献的同时,我们也积极地在我们的参考文献列表中促进性别和性别平衡。在引用与本工作科学相关的参考文献的同时,我们还积极努力促进在我们的参考文献列表中纳入历史上代表性不足的种族和/或民族群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAACAP open
JAACAP open Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信