Treatment Outcomes of an Adolescent Intensive Outpatient Program for Depressed and Suicidal Youth

Kelsey M. Bero MS , Giana I. Teresi MS , Giovanna Porta MS , Kimberly Poling LCSW , David A. Brent MD , Tina R. Goldstein PhD
{"title":"Treatment Outcomes of an Adolescent Intensive Outpatient Program for Depressed and Suicidal Youth","authors":"Kelsey M. Bero MS ,&nbsp;Giana I. Teresi MS ,&nbsp;Giovanna Porta MS ,&nbsp;Kimberly Poling LCSW ,&nbsp;David A. Brent MD ,&nbsp;Tina R. Goldstein PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Intensive outpatient programs (IOPs) provide an intermediate level of care for high-risk youth and were required to rapidly pivot to telehealth services amid the COVID-19 pandemic. This article aimed to compare symptom outcomes among adolescents treated in IOPs before vs during the pandemic and during the latter period to examine outcomes among adolescents who attended in-person vs via telehealth IOPs.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Depressed adolescents recommended for IOPs between December 2014 and April 2022 (N = 1,152) completed validated self-reports throughout treatment. Patients treated during the pandemic completed treatment in person, via telehealth, or a combination of both. Mixed-effects models were used to examine changes in symptoms over time in treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared with pre-pandemic patients (n = 828), adolescents who presented for treatment after the pandemic onset (n = 324) reported increased depression, anxiety, and nonsuicidal self-injury (<em>p</em>s ≤. 006) at intake. Adolescents treated in IOPs (n = 855) demonstrated significant improvement over each week in treatment (<em>p</em>s &lt; .001) across measures of depression (<em>b</em> = −0.79, 95% CI [−0.88, −0.71]), suicidal ideation and behavior (odds ratio = 0.59, 95% CI [0.55, 0.62]), and nonsuicidal self-injury (odds ratio = 0.51, 95% CI [0.46, 0.56]). Significant interactions between time and patient cohort indicated that the slopes of improvement for all outcomes were steeper during the pandemic (<em>p</em>s &lt; .001). There were no differences in improvement of depression, suicidal thoughts and behaviors, or nonsuicidal self-injury for in-person vs telehealth treatment during the pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings indicate similar treatment response to both IOP treatment modalities for suicidal adolescents. Future research should discern factors leading to faster response after the pandemic onset.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>This study examined treatment response in an intensive outpatient program (IOP) for depressed and suicidal adolescents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and compared response based on IOP delivery modality (ie, in-person vs telehealth). Depressed and suicidal adolescents presenting for IOP after the pandemic onset reported more severe symptoms at IOP intake than those who presented prior to the pandemic; however, their symptoms improved more quickly. Youth showed similar response to treatment regardless of whether IOP was delivered in person, via telehealth, or in combination. Clinicians providing treatment for depressed and suicidal youth may consider community-based IOPs that incorporate evidence-based programming delivered either in person or virtually as a promising treatment option for those in need of more intensive treatment, hospital diversion and/or step-down care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73525,"journal":{"name":"JAACAP open","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 576-588"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAACAP open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732924000954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Intensive outpatient programs (IOPs) provide an intermediate level of care for high-risk youth and were required to rapidly pivot to telehealth services amid the COVID-19 pandemic. This article aimed to compare symptom outcomes among adolescents treated in IOPs before vs during the pandemic and during the latter period to examine outcomes among adolescents who attended in-person vs via telehealth IOPs.

Method

Depressed adolescents recommended for IOPs between December 2014 and April 2022 (N = 1,152) completed validated self-reports throughout treatment. Patients treated during the pandemic completed treatment in person, via telehealth, or a combination of both. Mixed-effects models were used to examine changes in symptoms over time in treatment.

Results

Compared with pre-pandemic patients (n = 828), adolescents who presented for treatment after the pandemic onset (n = 324) reported increased depression, anxiety, and nonsuicidal self-injury (ps ≤. 006) at intake. Adolescents treated in IOPs (n = 855) demonstrated significant improvement over each week in treatment (ps < .001) across measures of depression (b = −0.79, 95% CI [−0.88, −0.71]), suicidal ideation and behavior (odds ratio = 0.59, 95% CI [0.55, 0.62]), and nonsuicidal self-injury (odds ratio = 0.51, 95% CI [0.46, 0.56]). Significant interactions between time and patient cohort indicated that the slopes of improvement for all outcomes were steeper during the pandemic (ps < .001). There were no differences in improvement of depression, suicidal thoughts and behaviors, or nonsuicidal self-injury for in-person vs telehealth treatment during the pandemic.

Conclusion

These findings indicate similar treatment response to both IOP treatment modalities for suicidal adolescents. Future research should discern factors leading to faster response after the pandemic onset.

Plain language summary

This study examined treatment response in an intensive outpatient program (IOP) for depressed and suicidal adolescents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and compared response based on IOP delivery modality (ie, in-person vs telehealth). Depressed and suicidal adolescents presenting for IOP after the pandemic onset reported more severe symptoms at IOP intake than those who presented prior to the pandemic; however, their symptoms improved more quickly. Youth showed similar response to treatment regardless of whether IOP was delivered in person, via telehealth, or in combination. Clinicians providing treatment for depressed and suicidal youth may consider community-based IOPs that incorporate evidence-based programming delivered either in person or virtually as a promising treatment option for those in need of more intensive treatment, hospital diversion and/or step-down care.
青少年抑郁症和自杀青少年强化门诊项目的治疗结果
强化门诊项目(IOPs)为高危青少年提供了中等水平的护理,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,需要迅速转向远程医疗服务。本文旨在比较大流行之前和期间在IOPs中治疗的青少年的症状结果,以及在后期检查亲自参加与通过远程医疗IOPs参加的青少年的结果。方法2014年12月至2022年4月间接受IOPs推荐的抑郁青少年(N = 1152)在整个治疗过程中完成了有效的自我报告。大流行期间接受治疗的患者亲自或通过远程医疗或两者结合完成了治疗。混合效应模型用于检查治疗过程中症状随时间的变化。结果与大流行前患者(n = 828)相比,大流行发病后就诊的青少年(n = 324)报告抑郁、焦虑和非自杀性自伤增加(ps≤。006)在入口。接受iop治疗的青少年(n = 855)在每周的治疗中表现出显著的改善(ps < 0.001),包括抑郁(b = - 0.79, 95% CI[- 0.88, - 0.71])、自杀意念和行为(比值比= 0.59,95% CI[0.55, 0.62])和非自杀自残(比值比= 0.51,95% CI[0.46, 0.56])。时间和患者队列之间的显著相互作用表明,大流行期间所有结局的改善斜率更大(ps < .001)。在大流行期间,面对面治疗与远程医疗治疗在改善抑郁、自杀念头和行为或非自杀性自伤方面没有差异。结论两种IOP治疗方式对自杀青少年的治疗效果相似。未来的研究应找出导致大流行开始后更快作出反应的因素。本研究调查了在COVID-19大流行之前和期间针对抑郁和自杀青少年的强化门诊项目(IOP)的治疗反应,并比较了基于IOP提供方式(即面对面和远程医疗)的反应。在大流行发病后出现IOP的抑郁和自杀青少年在服用IOP时报告的症状比大流行前出现的症状更严重;然而,他们的症状改善得更快。无论眼压治疗是亲自、远程医疗还是联合治疗,青少年对治疗的反应都是相似的。为抑郁症和自杀青年提供治疗的临床医生可以考虑以社区为基础的IOPs,其中包括当面或虚拟提供的循证方案,作为需要更强化治疗、医院转院和/或逐步护理的人的一种有希望的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAACAP open
JAACAP open Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信