{"title":"Associations between racialized economic segregation and retail food environments in the United States: an observational, cross-sectional study","authors":"Micah C. Jordan , Thomas Burgoine","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Historic policies segregating US cities have shaped inequities in contemporary retail food environments (RFEs). This study investigated associations between segregation and RFEs. Using publicly available data from the American Community Survey, we calculated Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) measures for racial, economic, and racialized economic segregation (i.e., ICE (Race), ICE (Income), ICE (Race + Income)) at the census tract (CT) and ZIP code tabulation area (ZCTA) levels. At the CT level, we used zero-inflated beta models with random effects to characterize associations between segregation and the modified retail food environment index (mRFEI). At the ZCTA level, we used negative binomial hurdle models with random effects to characterize associations between segregation and numbers of grocery retailers (overall, large and small), full-service restaurants, and limited-service restaurants. We observed evidence suggestive of a positive dose-response relationship between all ICE measures and the mRFEI, such that CTs with more privileged populations tended to have healthier RFEs. We found associations with ICE (Race + Income) were null for grocery retailers (overall, large and small), but a positive relationship emerged with density of full-service restaurants (i.e., more privilege, more outlets), and the most privileged areas had significantly more limited-service restaurants. Greater ICE (Race) (i.e., greater racial privilege) was associated with greater numbers of grocery retailers, full-service restaurants, and limited-service restaurants. ICE (Income) was not associated with the number of food retailers, though the least privileged quintile consistently had the most retailers. Overall, these findings highlight a potential pathway between US segregation and inequitable health outcomes via neighborhood RFEs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 103748"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622825002437","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Historic policies segregating US cities have shaped inequities in contemporary retail food environments (RFEs). This study investigated associations between segregation and RFEs. Using publicly available data from the American Community Survey, we calculated Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) measures for racial, economic, and racialized economic segregation (i.e., ICE (Race), ICE (Income), ICE (Race + Income)) at the census tract (CT) and ZIP code tabulation area (ZCTA) levels. At the CT level, we used zero-inflated beta models with random effects to characterize associations between segregation and the modified retail food environment index (mRFEI). At the ZCTA level, we used negative binomial hurdle models with random effects to characterize associations between segregation and numbers of grocery retailers (overall, large and small), full-service restaurants, and limited-service restaurants. We observed evidence suggestive of a positive dose-response relationship between all ICE measures and the mRFEI, such that CTs with more privileged populations tended to have healthier RFEs. We found associations with ICE (Race + Income) were null for grocery retailers (overall, large and small), but a positive relationship emerged with density of full-service restaurants (i.e., more privilege, more outlets), and the most privileged areas had significantly more limited-service restaurants. Greater ICE (Race) (i.e., greater racial privilege) was associated with greater numbers of grocery retailers, full-service restaurants, and limited-service restaurants. ICE (Income) was not associated with the number of food retailers, though the least privileged quintile consistently had the most retailers. Overall, these findings highlight a potential pathway between US segregation and inequitable health outcomes via neighborhood RFEs.
历史上隔离美国城市的政策形成了当代零售食品环境(rfe)的不平等。本研究调查了种族隔离与rfe之间的关系。利用美国社区调查(American Community Survey)的公开数据,我们计算了人口普查区(CT)和邮政编码制表区(ZCTA)级别的种族、经济和种族化经济隔离(即ICE(种族)、ICE(收入)、ICE(种族+收入))的极端集中指数(ICE)措施。在CT水平上,我们使用带有随机效应的零膨胀beta模型来表征隔离与修正零售食品环境指数(mRFEI)之间的关联。在ZCTA水平上,我们使用具有随机效应的负二项障碍模型来表征隔离与杂货零售商(总体上,大型和小型)、全方位服务餐馆和有限服务餐馆数量之间的关系。我们观察到的证据表明,所有ICE测量与mRFEI之间存在正剂量反应关系,因此,拥有更多特权人群的ct往往具有更健康的rfe。我们发现,与ICE(种族+收入)的关联对于杂货零售商(总体而言,无论大小)都是零,但与全方位服务餐馆的密度呈正相关(即更多特权,更多网点),并且最特权的地区有更多的有限服务餐馆。更大的ICE(种族)(即更大的种族特权)与更多的杂货店零售商、全方位服务餐馆和有限服务餐馆有关。ICE(收入)与食品零售商的数量无关,尽管最不受特权的五分之一群体始终拥有最多的零售商。总的来说,这些发现强调了美国种族隔离和不公平健康结果之间的潜在途径。
期刊介绍:
Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.