Robotic Process Automation and Employee Outcomes: A Quantitative Study of Role Changes, Work-Life Balance, and Job Opportunity

Pittawat Ueasangkomsate , Thanawan Boonsripornchai
{"title":"Robotic Process Automation and Employee Outcomes: A Quantitative Study of Role Changes, Work-Life Balance, and Job Opportunity","authors":"Pittawat Ueasangkomsate ,&nbsp;Thanawan Boonsripornchai","doi":"10.1016/j.procir.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates employees’ perceptions of the impact of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) on their roles, work-life balance, and job opportunities in a Thai state enterprise. The study employed a quantitative approach, collecting data from 171 employees who experienced RPA implementation using a structured questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Paired Samples t-test. The findings revealed significant differences in employees’ perceptions of role changes and work-life balance before and after RPA implementation. Employees reported increased assignment of challenging and skill-intensive tasks, as well as improved work-life balance, particularly in terms of reduced overtime work and better physical and mental health. However, no significant difference was found in employees’ perceptions of threatening job opportunities. The study contributes to the literature by providing insights into the impact of RPA on employees in a developing country context and offers practical recommendations for organizations to manage the workforce implications of automation. Future research should investigate the long-term effects of RPA on employee outcomes and explore the generalizability of the findings to other industries and cultural contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20535,"journal":{"name":"Procedia CIRP","volume":"136 ","pages":"Pages 3-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia CIRP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827125007553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates employees’ perceptions of the impact of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) on their roles, work-life balance, and job opportunities in a Thai state enterprise. The study employed a quantitative approach, collecting data from 171 employees who experienced RPA implementation using a structured questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Paired Samples t-test. The findings revealed significant differences in employees’ perceptions of role changes and work-life balance before and after RPA implementation. Employees reported increased assignment of challenging and skill-intensive tasks, as well as improved work-life balance, particularly in terms of reduced overtime work and better physical and mental health. However, no significant difference was found in employees’ perceptions of threatening job opportunities. The study contributes to the literature by providing insights into the impact of RPA on employees in a developing country context and offers practical recommendations for organizations to manage the workforce implications of automation. Future research should investigate the long-term effects of RPA on employee outcomes and explore the generalizability of the findings to other industries and cultural contexts.
机器人过程自动化和员工成果:角色变化、工作与生活平衡和工作机会的定量研究
本研究调查了泰国一家国有企业的员工对机器人过程自动化(RPA)对他们的角色、工作与生活平衡和工作机会的影响的看法。该研究采用了定量方法,使用结构化问卷收集了171名经历过RPA实施的员工的数据。数据分析采用描述性统计和配对样本t检验。研究发现,实施RPA前后,员工对角色变化和工作生活平衡的感知存在显著差异。雇员报告说,挑战性和技能密集型任务的分配增加了,工作与生活的平衡得到了改善,特别是在加班减少和身心健康改善方面。然而,在员工对威胁性工作机会的感知上,没有发现显著差异。该研究通过深入了解RPA对发展中国家员工的影响,为文献做出了贡献,并为组织管理自动化对劳动力的影响提供了实用建议。未来的研究应该调查RPA对员工结果的长期影响,并探索研究结果在其他行业和文化背景下的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信