A. Calabrese , P.L. Dragoni , C.T. Montserrat , M. Gheghici , I. Borelli , M. Taddei , C. Compagnone , E.G. Bignami
{"title":"Development of a contraction-based pain index (CONPAIN) to evaluate labor epidural analgesia effectiveness: a pilot proof-of-concept study","authors":"A. Calabrese , P.L. Dragoni , C.T. Montserrat , M. Gheghici , I. Borelli , M. Taddei , C. Compagnone , E.G. Bignami","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Assessment of labour pain is essential to guide neuraxial analgesia, yet current tools such as the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) are influenced by subjective variability. We developed and tested the Contraction Pain Index (CONPAIN), calculated as the percentage ratio of self-reported pain duration to contraction duration measured on external cardiotocography. We hypothesised that CONPAIN would show an early relative change from baseline than NRS in the first 10 minutes after dosing.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this exploratory, single-center pilot study, CONPAIN and NRS were recorded in 27 nulliparous women in active labor before and after initiation of epidural analgesia. Data collection started five minutes before the initial epidural bolus and continued for 20 min thereafter. The primary outcome was the temporal trend of CONPAIN relative to baseline; secondary outcome was the comparison of percentage change from baseline between CONPAIN and NRS and their correlation over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both metrics decreased within the first five minutes. Median percentage change at 0–5 minutes was −27.96 % for CONPAIN vs. −7.14 % for NRS (<em>P</em> < 0.001); at 6–10 minutes, −48.99 % vs. −40.00 % (<em>P</em> = 0.027). Differences were not significant after 10 minutes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this proof-of-concept study, CONPAIN showed greater relative changes compared to NRS during the first 10 minutes following initiation of labour analgesia, suggesting potential value in characterising the early dynamics of analgesic response. While these findings offer preliminary support for its clinical relevance, validation in larger populations is required.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 104759"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25003516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Assessment of labour pain is essential to guide neuraxial analgesia, yet current tools such as the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) are influenced by subjective variability. We developed and tested the Contraction Pain Index (CONPAIN), calculated as the percentage ratio of self-reported pain duration to contraction duration measured on external cardiotocography. We hypothesised that CONPAIN would show an early relative change from baseline than NRS in the first 10 minutes after dosing.
Methods
In this exploratory, single-center pilot study, CONPAIN and NRS were recorded in 27 nulliparous women in active labor before and after initiation of epidural analgesia. Data collection started five minutes before the initial epidural bolus and continued for 20 min thereafter. The primary outcome was the temporal trend of CONPAIN relative to baseline; secondary outcome was the comparison of percentage change from baseline between CONPAIN and NRS and their correlation over time.
Results
Both metrics decreased within the first five minutes. Median percentage change at 0–5 minutes was −27.96 % for CONPAIN vs. −7.14 % for NRS (P < 0.001); at 6–10 minutes, −48.99 % vs. −40.00 % (P = 0.027). Differences were not significant after 10 minutes.
Conclusions
In this proof-of-concept study, CONPAIN showed greater relative changes compared to NRS during the first 10 minutes following initiation of labour analgesia, suggesting potential value in characterising the early dynamics of analgesic response. While these findings offer preliminary support for its clinical relevance, validation in larger populations is required.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.