Enhanced insights into immunity traits of elderly patients in the intensive care unit with infections: evidence from a multicenter, prospective observational study

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ju Zou, Yuanyuan Xiao, Lina Zhang, Zhihong Zuo, Xianwen Wang, Xuelian Liao, Na Cui, Jialin Jin, Zhaoxin Qian, Anhua Wu, Chunhui Li
{"title":"Enhanced insights into immunity traits of elderly patients in the intensive care unit with infections: evidence from a multicenter, prospective observational study","authors":"Ju Zou, Yuanyuan Xiao, Lina Zhang, Zhihong Zuo, Xianwen Wang, Xuelian Liao, Na Cui, Jialin Jin, Zhaoxin Qian, Anhua Wu, Chunhui Li","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05616-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Infections, particularly sepsis, are a global health threat and a leading cause of mortality among elderly patients (≥ 60 years) in intensive care units (ICUs). The variable immune responses in this vulnerable population warrant deeper investigation. This multicenter prospective study included elderly patients with infections admitted to the ICUs of four hospitals between May 2023 and October 2024. Patients were classified into sepsis and non-sepsis infection groups based on a ≥2-point increase in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Baseline immune and inflammatory markers were compared between groups. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations with mortality. Subgroup analyses were conducted by sex, age, infection site, and pathogen type. Among 1,152 elderly patients with infections in the ICUs, 640 with sepsis were older (70.0 vs.72.0 years), were predominantly male (55.3% vs. 68.1%), and had more comorbidities, all P < 0.001. Compared with the non-sepsis infection group, the septic group had higher rates of mechanical ventilation (3.12% vs. 40.80%), longer hospitalization (7.00 [4.00;10.0] vs. 11.8 [6.00;18.0] days), and increased mortality (0.98% vs. 9.51%), all P < 0.001. Distinct immune-mortality signatures were observed. In the fully adjusted model, non-septic infection was associated with reduced monocytes, lymphocytes, and TNFα (odds ratio [OR] < 1), elevated interleukin-12 (IL12) and INFγ (OR > 1, all P < 0.05), whereas sepsis was characterized by increased neutrophil and B-cell activation (OR > 1), decreased T cells (OR < 1, all P < 0.05), and no specific cytokine signature (all P > 0.05). Sex differences included higher levels of innate immune markers in males and elevated adaptive immune indicators in females. With age, patients showed reduced T cell counts and increased inflammatory markers (procalcitonin and C-reactive protein). Patients aged > 80 years exhibited marked lymphopenia, lower CD4+ T cell counts (β < 1, P < 0.05), and elevated IL6 and platelet levels (β > 1, P < 0.05). Immune profiles also varied by pathogen type: fungal infections were associated with increased lymphocyte and cytotoxic T lymphocyte counts (β > 1, P < 0.05) compared with bacterial infections, whereas viral infections showed reduced T cell subsets and cytokine levels (IL6, IL8, IL17; β < 1, P < 0.05). Elderly patients in the ICU, especially those with sepsis, exhibit immune imbalances of hyperinflammation and immunosuppression, varying with age, sex, pathogen type, and infection site. These findings highlight the potential role of immune phenotyping in guiding treatment decisions in this patient population.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05616-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infections, particularly sepsis, are a global health threat and a leading cause of mortality among elderly patients (≥ 60 years) in intensive care units (ICUs). The variable immune responses in this vulnerable population warrant deeper investigation. This multicenter prospective study included elderly patients with infections admitted to the ICUs of four hospitals between May 2023 and October 2024. Patients were classified into sepsis and non-sepsis infection groups based on a ≥2-point increase in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Baseline immune and inflammatory markers were compared between groups. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations with mortality. Subgroup analyses were conducted by sex, age, infection site, and pathogen type. Among 1,152 elderly patients with infections in the ICUs, 640 with sepsis were older (70.0 vs.72.0 years), were predominantly male (55.3% vs. 68.1%), and had more comorbidities, all P < 0.001. Compared with the non-sepsis infection group, the septic group had higher rates of mechanical ventilation (3.12% vs. 40.80%), longer hospitalization (7.00 [4.00;10.0] vs. 11.8 [6.00;18.0] days), and increased mortality (0.98% vs. 9.51%), all P < 0.001. Distinct immune-mortality signatures were observed. In the fully adjusted model, non-septic infection was associated with reduced monocytes, lymphocytes, and TNFα (odds ratio [OR] < 1), elevated interleukin-12 (IL12) and INFγ (OR > 1, all P < 0.05), whereas sepsis was characterized by increased neutrophil and B-cell activation (OR > 1), decreased T cells (OR < 1, all P < 0.05), and no specific cytokine signature (all P > 0.05). Sex differences included higher levels of innate immune markers in males and elevated adaptive immune indicators in females. With age, patients showed reduced T cell counts and increased inflammatory markers (procalcitonin and C-reactive protein). Patients aged > 80 years exhibited marked lymphopenia, lower CD4+ T cell counts (β < 1, P < 0.05), and elevated IL6 and platelet levels (β > 1, P < 0.05). Immune profiles also varied by pathogen type: fungal infections were associated with increased lymphocyte and cytotoxic T lymphocyte counts (β > 1, P < 0.05) compared with bacterial infections, whereas viral infections showed reduced T cell subsets and cytokine levels (IL6, IL8, IL17; β < 1, P < 0.05). Elderly patients in the ICU, especially those with sepsis, exhibit immune imbalances of hyperinflammation and immunosuppression, varying with age, sex, pathogen type, and infection site. These findings highlight the potential role of immune phenotyping in guiding treatment decisions in this patient population.
加强对重症监护病房感染老年患者免疫特性的了解:来自多中心前瞻性观察研究的证据
感染,特别是败血症,是全球性的健康威胁,也是重症监护病房(icu)老年患者(≥60岁)死亡的主要原因。这一弱势群体的可变免疫反应值得深入研究。这项多中心前瞻性研究纳入了2023年5月至2024年10月期间入住四家医院icu的老年感染患者。根据顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分升高≥2分,将患者分为脓毒症和非脓毒症感染组。比较各组间基线免疫和炎症指标。Logistic回归分析用于评估与死亡率的关联。按性别、年龄、感染部位和病原体类型进行亚组分析。在1152例icu老年感染患者中,640例脓毒症患者年龄较大(70.0 vs.72.0岁),以男性为主(55.3% vs. 68.1%),合并症较多,均P < 0.001。与非脓毒症感染组相比,脓毒症组机械通气率较高(3.12%比40.80%),住院时间较长(7.00[4.00;10.0]比11.8[6.00;18.0]天),死亡率升高(0.98%比9.51%),P < 0.05, P < 0.01), T细胞减少(OR 0.05)。性别差异包括男性先天免疫标志物水平较高,女性适应性免疫指标水平较高。随着年龄的增长,患者表现出T细胞计数减少和炎症标志物(降钙素原和c反应蛋白)增加。与细菌感染相比,bb0 ~ 80岁患者淋巴细胞明显减少,CD4+ T细胞计数降低(β < 1, p1, p1, P < 0.05),而病毒感染患者T细胞亚群和细胞因子水平降低(IL6, IL8, IL17; β < 1, P < 0.05)。ICU的老年患者,尤其是脓毒症患者,表现出高亢炎症和免疫抑制的免疫失衡,随年龄、性别、病原体类型和感染部位的不同而不同。这些发现强调了免疫表型在指导该患者群体治疗决策中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信