Diverse methodologies of care: Thinking with and practising (soil) in situated, affective and enactive ways

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Emma L. Sharp, Kenzi Yee, Leane Makey, Karen Fisher
{"title":"Diverse methodologies of care: Thinking with and practising (soil) in situated, affective and enactive ways","authors":"Emma L. Sharp,&nbsp;Kenzi Yee,&nbsp;Leane Makey,&nbsp;Karen Fisher","doi":"10.1111/apv.12429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research article outlines a provocation for diverse and experimentally open, situated approaches to exploring care and caring. The diversely positioned authors discuss this idea using the subject of soil, in the place and context of Aotearoa New Zealand. Little is known about the diversity of ways that everyday people value, or, have caring relationships for/with soil, among a plethora of research that positions soil ‘care’ around, for example, commercial food production, waste-sinking, or property land value. To study diverse care in relation to soil, as with many relational subjects, requires equivalent diversity in the ways in which we might explore it. Here we outline the basis for diverse, situated methodologies that necessarily lead to a diversity of methods. This paper looks at the methodological imperatives that lead to exploring care, and discusses a variety of methods that generate different forms of ‘data’ with different forms of representation of that care. We observe that to holistically observe care relations with soil requires a diversity of methodologies, inherently ontological and epistemological – worldmaking. We discuss situated and enactive, affective approaches of Kaupapa Māori enquiry, monitoring and arts-based approaches to ‘measure’ soil care taking place, in place, and contextualise this with our own author positionality. We discuss this suite of experimental, reflexive, affective and responsive ways to measure soil care that are contingent on that being cared about, for, with and by, and which reciprocally give care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46928,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Viewpoint","volume":"66 2","pages":"224-236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Viewpoint","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apv.12429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research article outlines a provocation for diverse and experimentally open, situated approaches to exploring care and caring. The diversely positioned authors discuss this idea using the subject of soil, in the place and context of Aotearoa New Zealand. Little is known about the diversity of ways that everyday people value, or, have caring relationships for/with soil, among a plethora of research that positions soil ‘care’ around, for example, commercial food production, waste-sinking, or property land value. To study diverse care in relation to soil, as with many relational subjects, requires equivalent diversity in the ways in which we might explore it. Here we outline the basis for diverse, situated methodologies that necessarily lead to a diversity of methods. This paper looks at the methodological imperatives that lead to exploring care, and discusses a variety of methods that generate different forms of ‘data’ with different forms of representation of that care. We observe that to holistically observe care relations with soil requires a diversity of methodologies, inherently ontological and epistemological – worldmaking. We discuss situated and enactive, affective approaches of Kaupapa Māori enquiry, monitoring and arts-based approaches to ‘measure’ soil care taking place, in place, and contextualise this with our own author positionality. We discuss this suite of experimental, reflexive, affective and responsive ways to measure soil care that are contingent on that being cared about, for, with and by, and which reciprocally give care.

多样化的护理方法:以情境、情感和主动的方式思考和实践(土壤)
这篇研究文章概述了对探索关怀和关怀的多样化和实验开放的挑衅。不同位置的作者在新西兰奥特罗阿的地方和背景下,用土壤这个主题来讨论这个想法。在大量将土壤“关怀”定位于商业粮食生产、废物处理或财产土地价值等方面的研究中,人们对日常生活中重视土壤或与土壤建立关爱关系的方式的多样性知之甚少。要研究与土壤有关的多样化护理,就像研究许多相关主题一样,需要我们探索土壤的方式具有同等的多样性。在这里,我们概述了多样化的基础,定位的方法,必然导致多样性的方法。本文着眼于导致探索护理的方法必要性,并讨论了各种方法,这些方法产生不同形式的“数据”,并以不同形式表示该护理。我们观察到,要全面观察与土壤的护理关系需要多种方法,固有的本体论和认识论-世界制造。我们讨论了考帕帕Māori调查、监测和基于艺术的方法,以“测量”正在发生的土壤护理,并将其与我们自己的作者立场联系起来。我们讨论了这一套实验性的、自反性的、情感的和反应性的方法来衡量土壤护理,这些方法取决于被关心的、被关心的、被关心的和被关心的,并且它们相互给予照顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Viewpoint is a journal of international scope, particularly in the fields of geography and its allied disciplines. Reporting on research in East and South East Asia, as well as the Pacific region, coverage includes: - the growth of linkages between countries within the Asia Pacific region, including international investment, migration, and political and economic co-operation - the environmental consequences of agriculture, industrial and service growth, and resource developments within the region - first-hand field work into rural, industrial, and urban developments that are relevant to the wider Pacific, East and South East Asia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信