Design a Voluntary Cooperative Network Research in End-of-Life Care

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Cuiwen Fa, Fei Yang, Xinge Shi, Zhilin Xiang, Renye Zhang, Lingqi Wang, Jiahui Zeng, Jiahao Wu, Xinxin Lu, Min Song, Jun Jing
{"title":"Design a Voluntary Cooperative Network Research in End-of-Life Care","authors":"Cuiwen Fa,&nbsp;Fei Yang,&nbsp;Xinge Shi,&nbsp;Zhilin Xiang,&nbsp;Renye Zhang,&nbsp;Lingqi Wang,&nbsp;Jiahui Zeng,&nbsp;Jiahao Wu,&nbsp;Xinxin Lu,&nbsp;Min Song,&nbsp;Jun Jing","doi":"10.1111/apv.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper draws on empirical data from a research project on diversified models of palliative care and hospice in China to examine the development and implementation of a Voluntary Cooperative Network Research (VCNR) approach in end-of-life care. The current study identifies several barriers to service provision, including limited institutional development, inadequate resource investment, insufficient training in palliative medicine and low levels of public awareness. Policy restrictions further constrain the delivery of palliative care in nonhospital settings. Employing the VCNR approach, the research generated 1028 quality of death questionnaires (857 valid responses; 83.3% validity rate) and 364 death narratives across multiple settings. The VCNR method demonstrates strengths in mobilising diverse stakeholders and generating rich, multisited data, yet it also encounters challenges, such as the absence of clear dispute-resolution mechanisms and disparities in the professional backgrounds of participants. The study contributes to sociological understandings of end-of-life care in China by foregrounding the complexities of collaborative research in under-resourced and policy-sensitive domains. It also offers methodological reflections on participatory research infrastructures and their capacity to foster interdisciplinary dialogue and inform the future organisation of palliative care services.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46928,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Viewpoint","volume":"66 2","pages":"188-197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Viewpoint","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apv.70004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper draws on empirical data from a research project on diversified models of palliative care and hospice in China to examine the development and implementation of a Voluntary Cooperative Network Research (VCNR) approach in end-of-life care. The current study identifies several barriers to service provision, including limited institutional development, inadequate resource investment, insufficient training in palliative medicine and low levels of public awareness. Policy restrictions further constrain the delivery of palliative care in nonhospital settings. Employing the VCNR approach, the research generated 1028 quality of death questionnaires (857 valid responses; 83.3% validity rate) and 364 death narratives across multiple settings. The VCNR method demonstrates strengths in mobilising diverse stakeholders and generating rich, multisited data, yet it also encounters challenges, such as the absence of clear dispute-resolution mechanisms and disparities in the professional backgrounds of participants. The study contributes to sociological understandings of end-of-life care in China by foregrounding the complexities of collaborative research in under-resourced and policy-sensitive domains. It also offers methodological reflections on participatory research infrastructures and their capacity to foster interdisciplinary dialogue and inform the future organisation of palliative care services.

临终关怀自愿性合作网络设计研究
本文通过对中国姑息治疗和临终关怀多元模式研究项目的实证数据,考察了自愿合作网络研究(VCNR)方法在临终关怀中的发展和实施。目前的研究确定了提供服务的几个障碍,包括机构发展有限、资源投资不足、姑息医学培训不足和公众认识水平低。政策限制进一步限制了在非医院环境中提供姑息治疗。采用VCNR方法,研究生成了1028份高质量的死亡问卷(857份有效回复,有效性为83.3%)和364份不同设置的死亡叙述。VCNR方法在动员不同的利益相关者和产生丰富的、多地点的数据方面表现出优势,但它也面临挑战,例如缺乏明确的争议解决机制和参与者专业背景的差异。该研究通过突出资源不足和政策敏感领域合作研究的复杂性,有助于社会学对中国临终关怀的理解。它还提供了参与性研究基础设施及其促进跨学科对话和告知未来组织姑息治疗服务的能力的方法学反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Viewpoint is a journal of international scope, particularly in the fields of geography and its allied disciplines. Reporting on research in East and South East Asia, as well as the Pacific region, coverage includes: - the growth of linkages between countries within the Asia Pacific region, including international investment, migration, and political and economic co-operation - the environmental consequences of agriculture, industrial and service growth, and resource developments within the region - first-hand field work into rural, industrial, and urban developments that are relevant to the wider Pacific, East and South East Asia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信