Does the state usher in a special stage in history? Probing the Dawn of Everything: A new history of humanity

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Elias L. Khalil
{"title":"Does the state usher in a special stage in history? Probing the Dawn of Everything: A new history of humanity","authors":"Elias L. Khalil","doi":"10.1111/taja.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In <i>The Dawn of Everything</i>, David Graeber and David Wengrow suggest that almost all modern features of social structures— cities, religious rituals, kingships, accounting practices, rational arguments, private property, and so on—date to epochs prior to the neolithic revolution. They question the characterisation of the introduction of agriculture as a ‘revolution’. This paper distils Graeber and Wengrow's contribution into two core theses. The first is that all social structures are underpinned by a common and universal consciousness based on the quest for both freedom and identity, which explains the continuity of the same basic consciousness throughout history. This undermines stadial evolutionary theories. The second thesis is that the state, starting with the Pharaoh's civilisation, ushers in a special stage in history, as it suppresses various cherished freedoms. While this paper welcomes Graeber and Wengrow's first thesis, it finds the second thesis to be problematic. The suppression of freedom occurs also in pre-Pharaoh social structures. Of more importance, their second thesis advances a stadial theory, which is inconsistent with the first thesis. This paper puts forward an alternative account of the origin of the state based on Franz Steiner's theory of slavery. While Graeber and Wengrow highly commend Steiner's theory, they appear not cognisant of the fact that it challenges their second thesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":45452,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Anthropology","volume":"36 2","pages":"321-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/taja.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/taja.70012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In The Dawn of Everything, David Graeber and David Wengrow suggest that almost all modern features of social structures— cities, religious rituals, kingships, accounting practices, rational arguments, private property, and so on—date to epochs prior to the neolithic revolution. They question the characterisation of the introduction of agriculture as a ‘revolution’. This paper distils Graeber and Wengrow's contribution into two core theses. The first is that all social structures are underpinned by a common and universal consciousness based on the quest for both freedom and identity, which explains the continuity of the same basic consciousness throughout history. This undermines stadial evolutionary theories. The second thesis is that the state, starting with the Pharaoh's civilisation, ushers in a special stage in history, as it suppresses various cherished freedoms. While this paper welcomes Graeber and Wengrow's first thesis, it finds the second thesis to be problematic. The suppression of freedom occurs also in pre-Pharaoh social structures. Of more importance, their second thesis advances a stadial theory, which is inconsistent with the first thesis. This paper puts forward an alternative account of the origin of the state based on Franz Steiner's theory of slavery. While Graeber and Wengrow highly commend Steiner's theory, they appear not cognisant of the fact that it challenges their second thesis.

国家是否迎来了一个特殊的历史阶段?探索万物的黎明:一部新的人类历史
在《万物的黎明》一书中,大卫·格雷伯和大卫·温格罗认为,几乎所有现代社会结构的特征——城市、宗教仪式、王权、会计实践、理性论证、私有财产等等——都可以追溯到新石器时代革命之前的时代。他们质疑将农业引进描述为一场“革命”的说法。本文将格雷伯和温格罗的贡献归纳为两篇核心论文。首先,所有社会结构都是由一种共同和普遍的意识所支撑的,这种意识是基于对自由和身份的追求,这解释了同一种基本意识在历史上的连续性。这破坏了传统的进化论。第二个论点是,从法老文明开始的国家,因为它压制了各种珍贵的自由,开启了一个特殊的历史阶段。虽然本文欢迎格雷伯和温格罗的第一个论点,但它发现第二个论点是有问题的。对自由的压制也发生在法老之前的社会结构中。更重要的是,他们的第二篇论文提出了一个与第一篇论文不一致的标准理论。本文以弗朗茨·斯坦纳的奴隶制理论为基础,提出了国家起源的另一种解释。虽然格雷伯和温格罗高度赞扬了斯坦纳的理论,但他们似乎没有意识到这一理论挑战了他们的第二个论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信