Exercising a Process of Incorporated Self-Reflexivity and Co-Reflexivity: Conducting Research on Chinese Family Caregivers of End-of-Life Patients

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Yixi Lu, Jing Wang, Jason A. Jean
{"title":"Exercising a Process of Incorporated Self-Reflexivity and Co-Reflexivity: Conducting Research on Chinese Family Caregivers of End-of-Life Patients","authors":"Yixi Lu,&nbsp;Jing Wang,&nbsp;Jason A. Jean","doi":"10.1111/apv.12434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>There are considerable methodological and emotional challenges conducting research on family caregivers of end-of-life patients. In this article, we identified the major challenges encountered while studying a group of Chinese immigrant family caregivers of terminally ill patients. Drawing upon the concept of reflexivity and building on the previous literature, two types of reflexivity, self-reflexivity and co-reflexivity, were introduced and incorporated into a research process. It is argued that co-reflexivity, where co-researchers engaging in reflexive dialogues, can be an essential component to a process of reflexive activities, in addition to self-reflexivity. During the journey of designing and applying this incorporated process, we were able to manage ethical, methodological and emotional challenges, to gain in-depth and critical interpretations of the participant's narratives, to mitigate researcher biases, and to inspire new ideas for future research. We argue this process may serve as a working structure for exercising reflexivity within a small multidisciplinary/cross-functional research team. It can be an unfinalized research method tool open for other researchers to adapt, revise and re-create for their own implementation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46928,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Viewpoint","volume":"66 2","pages":"205-214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Viewpoint","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apv.12434","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are considerable methodological and emotional challenges conducting research on family caregivers of end-of-life patients. In this article, we identified the major challenges encountered while studying a group of Chinese immigrant family caregivers of terminally ill patients. Drawing upon the concept of reflexivity and building on the previous literature, two types of reflexivity, self-reflexivity and co-reflexivity, were introduced and incorporated into a research process. It is argued that co-reflexivity, where co-researchers engaging in reflexive dialogues, can be an essential component to a process of reflexive activities, in addition to self-reflexivity. During the journey of designing and applying this incorporated process, we were able to manage ethical, methodological and emotional challenges, to gain in-depth and critical interpretations of the participant's narratives, to mitigate researcher biases, and to inspire new ideas for future research. We argue this process may serve as a working structure for exercising reflexivity within a small multidisciplinary/cross-functional research team. It can be an unfinalized research method tool open for other researchers to adapt, revise and re-create for their own implementation.

自我反身与共同反身的融合:对中国临终病人家属照护者的研究
对临终病人的家庭照顾者进行研究,在方法和情感上存在相当大的挑战。在这篇文章中,我们确定了在研究一组中国移民家庭照顾绝症患者时遇到的主要挑战。借鉴反身性的概念,在以往文献的基础上,引入了两种类型的反身性,即自我反身性和共同反身性,并将其纳入研究过程。有人认为,除了自我反思之外,共同研究人员参与反思性对话的共同反思性可以成为反思性活动过程的重要组成部分。在设计和应用这一整合过程的过程中,我们能够应对伦理、方法和情感方面的挑战,对参与者的叙述进行深入和批判性的解释,减轻研究人员的偏见,并为未来的研究激发新的想法。我们认为这个过程可以作为一个小型多学科/跨职能研究团队中练习反身性的工作结构。它可以是一个未完成的研究方法工具,开放给其他研究人员适应,修改和重新创建自己的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Viewpoint is a journal of international scope, particularly in the fields of geography and its allied disciplines. Reporting on research in East and South East Asia, as well as the Pacific region, coverage includes: - the growth of linkages between countries within the Asia Pacific region, including international investment, migration, and political and economic co-operation - the environmental consequences of agriculture, industrial and service growth, and resource developments within the region - first-hand field work into rural, industrial, and urban developments that are relevant to the wider Pacific, East and South East Asia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信