Effect of metoclopramide on gastric volume and nausea and vomiting in fasted patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical equivalence trial
Samantha F. Lu , Robert J. McCarthy , Paloma Toledo , Caroline L. Thomas , Ian N. Gaston , Alexander G. Samworth , Pauline E. Ripchik , Mikayla B. Troughton , Carmen E. Lopez , Jessica H. Kruse , Jennifer M. Banayan
{"title":"Effect of metoclopramide on gastric volume and nausea and vomiting in fasted patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical equivalence trial","authors":"Samantha F. Lu , Robert J. McCarthy , Paloma Toledo , Caroline L. Thomas , Ian N. Gaston , Alexander G. Samworth , Pauline E. Ripchik , Mikayla B. Troughton , Carmen E. Lopez , Jessica H. Kruse , Jennifer M. Banayan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia recommend preoperative fasting and aspiration prophylaxis including non-particulate antacids, H<sub>2</sub>-receptor antagonists, and/or metoclopramide for elective cesarean deliveries. This study evaluated the effect of metoclopramide on gastric volume in appropriately fasted patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled equivalence trial of appropriately fasted patients presenting for elective cesarean delivery. Patients were randomized to receive intravenous metoclopramide 10 mg or saline. Gastric ultrasound was performed before and 30 minutes after study medication administration in the right lateral decubitus and the supine positions. Gastric volumes were estimated using the Roukhomovsky and Perlas methods. We hypothesized that metoclopramide would not significantly decrease gastric volume compared to saline within the equivalence limits of ± 17 mL.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventy-two patients completed the study. Median gastric volume estimates were greater using the Roukhomovsky compared to the Perlas method (pre-treatment difference 13 mL, <em>P</em> < 0.001; post-treatment difference 11 mL, <em>P</em> < 0.001). No differences in the number of patients identified as at risk for aspiration (gastric volume > 1.5 mL/kg) were found between groups. The median pre- to post-treatment difference in gastric volume between saline and metoclopramide groups, calculated using the Perlas method, was −1 mL (95 % CI −5 to 2, <em>P</em> = 0.375) and 1 mL (95 % CI −4 to 5, <em>P</em> = 0.981) using the Roukhomovsky method. Equivalence was determined significant for both methods (<em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>In appropriately fasted patients, metoclopramide and saline were equivalent in their effect on gastric volume within ± 17 mL, showing metoclopramide administration had minimal effect on gastric volume in this low-risk population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 104754"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25003462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia recommend preoperative fasting and aspiration prophylaxis including non-particulate antacids, H2-receptor antagonists, and/or metoclopramide for elective cesarean deliveries. This study evaluated the effect of metoclopramide on gastric volume in appropriately fasted patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.
Methods
We conducted a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled equivalence trial of appropriately fasted patients presenting for elective cesarean delivery. Patients were randomized to receive intravenous metoclopramide 10 mg or saline. Gastric ultrasound was performed before and 30 minutes after study medication administration in the right lateral decubitus and the supine positions. Gastric volumes were estimated using the Roukhomovsky and Perlas methods. We hypothesized that metoclopramide would not significantly decrease gastric volume compared to saline within the equivalence limits of ± 17 mL.
Results
Seventy-two patients completed the study. Median gastric volume estimates were greater using the Roukhomovsky compared to the Perlas method (pre-treatment difference 13 mL, P < 0.001; post-treatment difference 11 mL, P < 0.001). No differences in the number of patients identified as at risk for aspiration (gastric volume > 1.5 mL/kg) were found between groups. The median pre- to post-treatment difference in gastric volume between saline and metoclopramide groups, calculated using the Perlas method, was −1 mL (95 % CI −5 to 2, P = 0.375) and 1 mL (95 % CI −4 to 5, P = 0.981) using the Roukhomovsky method. Equivalence was determined significant for both methods (P < 0.001).
Discussion
In appropriately fasted patients, metoclopramide and saline were equivalent in their effect on gastric volume within ± 17 mL, showing metoclopramide administration had minimal effect on gastric volume in this low-risk population.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.