Unleashing resilience through digitalization: Do upstream and downstream firms differ?

IF 7.2 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Zishun Qian , Tingting Yan , Jianbin Li , Yicheng Zhang
{"title":"Unleashing resilience through digitalization: Do upstream and downstream firms differ?","authors":"Zishun Qian ,&nbsp;Tingting Yan ,&nbsp;Jianbin Li ,&nbsp;Yicheng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Does digitalization enable a firm to gain resilience after a broad, large-scale supply chain disruption? The literature is not conclusive about this question. Furthermore, the mechanisms through which digitalization affects firm resilience and whether these mechanisms vary between upstream and downstream firms along a supply chain remain unclear. Drawing on resource orchestration theory, this study examines how upstream and downstream firms differ in supply chain reconfiguration strategies, enabled by digitalization, for increasing resilience. We construct a multisource secondary data set on 3043 firms to test the hypotheses. Using the COVID-19 pandemic as the empirical context, this study shows that digitalization enhances the resilience of upstream firms primarily through customer concentration growth, while for downstream firms, supplier concentration reduction is the main mechanism. Theoretically, these findings provide a resource orchestration rationale for understanding differences between upstream and downstream firms in supply chain resource reconfiguration strategies for enhanced resilience after a broad, large-scale disruption. These findings also provide practical guidance to enable firms to exploit the resilience-enhancing power of digitalization better.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 103411"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325001379","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Does digitalization enable a firm to gain resilience after a broad, large-scale supply chain disruption? The literature is not conclusive about this question. Furthermore, the mechanisms through which digitalization affects firm resilience and whether these mechanisms vary between upstream and downstream firms along a supply chain remain unclear. Drawing on resource orchestration theory, this study examines how upstream and downstream firms differ in supply chain reconfiguration strategies, enabled by digitalization, for increasing resilience. We construct a multisource secondary data set on 3043 firms to test the hypotheses. Using the COVID-19 pandemic as the empirical context, this study shows that digitalization enhances the resilience of upstream firms primarily through customer concentration growth, while for downstream firms, supplier concentration reduction is the main mechanism. Theoretically, these findings provide a resource orchestration rationale for understanding differences between upstream and downstream firms in supply chain resource reconfiguration strategies for enhanced resilience after a broad, large-scale disruption. These findings also provide practical guidance to enable firms to exploit the resilience-enhancing power of digitalization better.
通过数字化释放弹性:上下游企业是否存在差异?
数字化是否能使企业在广泛、大规模的供应链中断后获得弹性?文献对这个问题没有定论。此外,数字化影响企业弹性的机制以及这些机制在供应链上下游企业之间是否存在差异仍不清楚。利用资源编排理论,本研究考察了上游和下游企业在数字化支持下提高弹性的供应链重构策略上的差异。我们构建了一个包含3043家公司的多源辅助数据集来检验这些假设。以2019冠状病毒病大流行为实证背景,研究表明数字化增强上游企业弹性主要通过客户集中度的增长,而对下游企业而言,供应商集中度的降低是主要机制。从理论上讲,这些发现为理解上下游企业在供应链资源重新配置策略上的差异提供了资源编排的基本原理,以增强在广泛、大规模中断后的弹性。这些发现也为企业更好地利用数字化增强弹性的力量提供了实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信