Multi-criteria decision support for flexible dividing wall distillation columns

IF 4.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
David Mogalle , Patrick Otto Ludl , Tobias Seidel , Lea Trescher , Thomas Grützner , Michael Bortz
{"title":"Multi-criteria decision support for flexible dividing wall distillation columns","authors":"David Mogalle ,&nbsp;Patrick Otto Ludl ,&nbsp;Tobias Seidel ,&nbsp;Lea Trescher ,&nbsp;Thomas Grützner ,&nbsp;Michael Bortz","doi":"10.1016/j.dche.2025.100258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>When designing a dividing wall column, some decisions regarding the layout of the column cannot be altered once the unit is built, whereas decisions regarding the column’s operation can, to some extent, be adjusted later. During the design phase, both layout and operation can be optimized to achieve an optimal column performance. However, such solutions are tailored to pre-specified process demands. If these demands change later, the physical layout can become suboptimal. Hence, we are interested in design decisions that keep the losses in performance minimal, leading to a column design that is flexible across different demands.</div><div>In this paper, we present a new methodology to measure flexibility. The approach is based on multi-criteria optimization, where Pareto fronts with fixed design variables and optimized operating variables are compared to an ideal Pareto front that optimizes both the layout and the operation simultaneously. The difference between two such fronts, representing the losses in performance of the fixed layout for a wide range of demands, is measured by a novel flexibility indicator. We apply our methodology to designing a dividing wall column separating an example mixture. A fast computation of the corresponding Pareto fronts is achieved by solving the arising optimization problems using a reduction method based on stage-to-stage calculations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72815,"journal":{"name":"Digital Chemical Engineering","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100258"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772508125000420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When designing a dividing wall column, some decisions regarding the layout of the column cannot be altered once the unit is built, whereas decisions regarding the column’s operation can, to some extent, be adjusted later. During the design phase, both layout and operation can be optimized to achieve an optimal column performance. However, such solutions are tailored to pre-specified process demands. If these demands change later, the physical layout can become suboptimal. Hence, we are interested in design decisions that keep the losses in performance minimal, leading to a column design that is flexible across different demands.
In this paper, we present a new methodology to measure flexibility. The approach is based on multi-criteria optimization, where Pareto fronts with fixed design variables and optimized operating variables are compared to an ideal Pareto front that optimizes both the layout and the operation simultaneously. The difference between two such fronts, representing the losses in performance of the fixed layout for a wide range of demands, is measured by a novel flexibility indicator. We apply our methodology to designing a dividing wall column separating an example mixture. A fast computation of the corresponding Pareto fronts is achieved by solving the arising optimization problems using a reduction method based on stage-to-stage calculations.
柔性分壁精馏塔多准则决策支持
当设计分隔墙柱时,有关柱的布局的一些决定一旦建成就不能改变,而有关柱的操作的决定可以在一定程度上稍后调整。在设计阶段,布局和操作都可以优化,以实现最佳的列性能。然而,这样的解决方案是针对预先指定的过程需求量身定制的。如果这些需求后来发生了变化,那么物理布局可能会变得不理想。因此,我们感兴趣的是使性能损失最小化的设计决策,从而使列设计能够灵活地满足不同的需求。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的方法来衡量灵活性。该方法基于多标准优化,将具有固定设计变量和优化操作变量的帕累托前沿与同时优化布局和操作的理想帕累托前沿进行比较。两个这样的前沿之间的差异,代表了固定布局在广泛需求范围内的性能损失,是通过一个新的灵活性指标来衡量的。我们应用我们的方法来设计分离样品混合物的分壁柱。通过使用基于逐级计算的约简方法解决出现的优化问题,实现了相应Pareto前沿的快速计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信