Revisiting Slope Stability Analysis Using Tension-Truncated Power-Law Yield Criterion

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
R. Ganesh
{"title":"Revisiting Slope Stability Analysis Using Tension-Truncated Power-Law Yield Criterion","authors":"R. Ganesh","doi":"10.1002/nag.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Existing studies on slope stability have mostly been performed using the linear yield criterion without accounting for the true tensile strength of soils. However, soils generally exhibit marked nonlinearity in shear strength and practically negligible tensile strengths compared to theoretical estimates from the yield function. This research revisits the finite slope stability problem under plane strain conditions by employing a power-law (PL) yield criterion with a tensile strength cut-off. Here, a PL yield criterion is truncated with a circular stress envelope that tangentially encompasses the nonlinear PL yield function for a given uniaxial tensile strength. Unlike earlier studies, this research proposes a new horizontal slice-based rotational failure mechanism, and the solutions are rigorously determined within the upper bound plasticity theory by fully accounting for the variable nature of friction angles along the slip surface in a nonlinear bonded medium. The effect of pore-water pressure on the results is also investigated. The study shows that additional nonlinearity in the yield function, due to the tensile strength cut-off, can significantly influence the outcome of the stability assessment. The results of this study compared reasonably well with findings in the existing literature. The novelty of this study lies in presenting a new slice-based numerical solution procedure for investigating slope stability with variable friction angles and demonstrating the significant impact of tensile strength cut-off on stability assessment outcomes in nonlinear bonded soils.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"49 16","pages":"3931-3943"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.70050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing studies on slope stability have mostly been performed using the linear yield criterion without accounting for the true tensile strength of soils. However, soils generally exhibit marked nonlinearity in shear strength and practically negligible tensile strengths compared to theoretical estimates from the yield function. This research revisits the finite slope stability problem under plane strain conditions by employing a power-law (PL) yield criterion with a tensile strength cut-off. Here, a PL yield criterion is truncated with a circular stress envelope that tangentially encompasses the nonlinear PL yield function for a given uniaxial tensile strength. Unlike earlier studies, this research proposes a new horizontal slice-based rotational failure mechanism, and the solutions are rigorously determined within the upper bound plasticity theory by fully accounting for the variable nature of friction angles along the slip surface in a nonlinear bonded medium. The effect of pore-water pressure on the results is also investigated. The study shows that additional nonlinearity in the yield function, due to the tensile strength cut-off, can significantly influence the outcome of the stability assessment. The results of this study compared reasonably well with findings in the existing literature. The novelty of this study lies in presenting a new slice-based numerical solution procedure for investigating slope stability with variable friction angles and demonstrating the significant impact of tensile strength cut-off on stability assessment outcomes in nonlinear bonded soils.

Abstract Image

用张力截断幂律屈服准则重新审视边坡稳定性分析
现有的边坡稳定性研究大多采用线性屈服准则,而没有考虑土壤的真实抗拉强度。然而,与屈服函数的理论估计相比,土壤通常在抗剪强度和几乎可以忽略的抗拉强度方面表现出明显的非线性。本研究通过采用具有抗拉强度截断的幂律屈服准则,重新审视了平面应变条件下的有限边坡稳定性问题。在这里,一个PL屈服标准被截断与一个圆形应力包络,切向包括非线性PL屈服函数为给定的单轴抗拉强度。与先前的研究不同,本研究提出了一种新的基于水平片的旋转破坏机制,并且通过充分考虑非线性粘结介质中沿滑移面摩擦角的可变性质,在上限塑性理论中严格确定了解决方案。研究了孔隙水压力对结果的影响。研究表明,由于抗拉强度截断,屈服函数中附加的非线性会显著影响稳定性评估的结果。这项研究的结果与现有文献的发现比较得相当好。本研究的新颖之处在于提出了一种新的基于切片的数值解程序来研究变摩擦角下的边坡稳定性,并证明了抗拉强度切断对非线性黏结土稳定性评估结果的重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信