{"title":"Seed activism on four fronts: MASIPAG’s rice seed struggles in the Philippines","authors":"Lisette J. Nikol, Conny Almekinders, Kees Jansen","doi":"10.1007/s10460-025-10747-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Seed activism critiques the various ways in which capitalist accumulation through modern agricultural development separates farmers from the seed. Debates centre on legal activism contesting privatisation and seed registration based on exclusionary criteria and various examples of practical work to strengthen farmer seed systems organised around ideas of seed sovereignty and seed commons. The article provides an illustrative example of practical seed activism of the farmer-led network MASIPAG in the Philippines that has been contesting the government’s Green Revolution-oriented commercial seed sector development. Examining critiques in the literature and MASIPAG’s practical work, we propose a distinction between four trajectories of accumulation that separate farmers from the seed and four corresponding fronts at which practical seed activism mobilises: genetic properties of modern varieties, commodified farming and labour, seed and variety legislation, and the contemporary regime of modern plant breeding. Our analysis of the empirical case illustrates the particular dynamics associated with the different trajectories of accumulation, the seed activist responses, and how they intersect in local level seed networks. We argue that MASIPAG’s practical work is an illustrative example of critical engagement with the very capitalist dynamics that its work critiques. Rather than developing an alternative that wholly withdraws, its practical efforts provide lessons about redrawing the boundaries of seed systems and reveals the possibilities for seed systems writ large to be transformed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"42 3","pages":"1977 - 1995"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-025-10747-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-025-10747-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Seed activism critiques the various ways in which capitalist accumulation through modern agricultural development separates farmers from the seed. Debates centre on legal activism contesting privatisation and seed registration based on exclusionary criteria and various examples of practical work to strengthen farmer seed systems organised around ideas of seed sovereignty and seed commons. The article provides an illustrative example of practical seed activism of the farmer-led network MASIPAG in the Philippines that has been contesting the government’s Green Revolution-oriented commercial seed sector development. Examining critiques in the literature and MASIPAG’s practical work, we propose a distinction between four trajectories of accumulation that separate farmers from the seed and four corresponding fronts at which practical seed activism mobilises: genetic properties of modern varieties, commodified farming and labour, seed and variety legislation, and the contemporary regime of modern plant breeding. Our analysis of the empirical case illustrates the particular dynamics associated with the different trajectories of accumulation, the seed activist responses, and how they intersect in local level seed networks. We argue that MASIPAG’s practical work is an illustrative example of critical engagement with the very capitalist dynamics that its work critiques. Rather than developing an alternative that wholly withdraws, its practical efforts provide lessons about redrawing the boundaries of seed systems and reveals the possibilities for seed systems writ large to be transformed.
期刊介绍:
Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems.
To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.