Agricultural startups’ visions of a sustainable agri-food future: a comparative case study in rural and urban Germany

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Katharina Rock, Jonathan Friedrich, Jana Zscheischler
{"title":"Agricultural startups’ visions of a sustainable agri-food future: a comparative case study in rural and urban Germany","authors":"Katharina Rock,&nbsp;Jonathan Friedrich,&nbsp;Jana Zscheischler","doi":"10.1007/s10460-025-10750-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Current agriculture and food systems are major drivers of global environmental change and are linked to numerous ethical concerns. Against this backdrop, agri-startups are perceived as promising catalysts for new and more sustainable agri-food systems. However, their potential to actually contribute to sustainability transformations has been understudied. The aim of this study is to narrow this gap by analyzing German agri-startups’ visions and how these co-produce prevailing or novel sociotechnical imaginaries in agriculture. We conduct an in-depth qualitative comparative case study of agri-startups (<i>n</i>=16) in both a rural–agrarian and an urban (nonagricultural) setting in Germany. We identify four visions with varying scales and scopes of envisioned change, with different conceptualizations of sustainable agri-food transformation: (1) <i>Reconfiguration of Sociomaterial Structures</i>, (2) <i>Partial Redesign</i>, (3) <i>Optimization of Value Chains</i>, and (4) <i>Incremental Improvement</i>. Our findings highlight the relevance of the sociospatial context of agri-startups and innovation processes in co-producing agri-food futures. While urban startups tend to envision more holistic changes, rural agri-startups rather envision applied and pragmatic changes. We critically discuss the differences among these visions and their limited ability to transform existing agri-food systems. Finally, we highlight that agri-startups largely perpetuate existing imaginaries and that the disruptive character that is often attributed to (agri-) startups needs critical scrutiny.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"42 3","pages":"2033 - 2053"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-025-10750-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-025-10750-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current agriculture and food systems are major drivers of global environmental change and are linked to numerous ethical concerns. Against this backdrop, agri-startups are perceived as promising catalysts for new and more sustainable agri-food systems. However, their potential to actually contribute to sustainability transformations has been understudied. The aim of this study is to narrow this gap by analyzing German agri-startups’ visions and how these co-produce prevailing or novel sociotechnical imaginaries in agriculture. We conduct an in-depth qualitative comparative case study of agri-startups (n=16) in both a rural–agrarian and an urban (nonagricultural) setting in Germany. We identify four visions with varying scales and scopes of envisioned change, with different conceptualizations of sustainable agri-food transformation: (1) Reconfiguration of Sociomaterial Structures, (2) Partial Redesign, (3) Optimization of Value Chains, and (4) Incremental Improvement. Our findings highlight the relevance of the sociospatial context of agri-startups and innovation processes in co-producing agri-food futures. While urban startups tend to envision more holistic changes, rural agri-startups rather envision applied and pragmatic changes. We critically discuss the differences among these visions and their limited ability to transform existing agri-food systems. Finally, we highlight that agri-startups largely perpetuate existing imaginaries and that the disruptive character that is often attributed to (agri-) startups needs critical scrutiny.

农业创业公司对可持续农业食品未来的愿景:德国农村和城市的比较案例研究
当前的农业和粮食系统是全球环境变化的主要驱动因素,并与许多伦理问题有关。在这种背景下,农业创业公司被视为新的、更可持续的农业粮食系统的有希望的催化剂。然而,它们对可持续性转变的实际贡献潜力尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是通过分析德国农业创业公司的愿景以及这些愿景如何共同产生农业中流行或新颖的社会技术想象来缩小这一差距。我们在德国的农村-农业和城市(非农业)环境中对农业创业公司(n=16)进行了深入的定性比较案例研究。我们确定了四种愿景,它们具有不同规模和范围的设想变化,具有不同的可持续农业食品转型概念:(1)社会材料结构的重构,(2)部分重新设计,(3)价值链的优化,(4)增量改进。我们的研究结果强调了农业创业公司的社会空间背景和共同生产农业食品期货的创新过程的相关性。城市创业公司倾向于设想更全面的变化,而农村农业创业公司更倾向于设想应用和务实的变化。我们批判性地讨论了这些愿景之间的差异以及它们改造现有农业食品系统的有限能力。最后,我们强调,农业创业公司在很大程度上延续了现有的想象,而通常归因于(农业)创业公司的破坏性特征需要严格审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信